You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 9,144,547


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,144,547
Title:Oral dosage form for controlled drug release
Abstract: An oral dosage form comprising, (i) an erodable core, which core comprises a pharmaceutically active weak base or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or solvate thereof; and (ii) an erodable coating surrounding said core, which coating comprises one or more openings extending substantially completely through said coating but not penetrating said core and communicating from the environment of use to said core; characterized in that release of the pharmaceutically active weak base or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or solvate thereof from the dosage form occurs through the said opening(s) by the erosion of said erodable core and through erosion of said erodable coating under pre-determined pH conditions; a process for preparing such a dosage form and the use of such a dosage form in medicine.
Inventor(s): Li; Chi Leung (Harlow, GB), Martini; Luigi (Harlow, GB), Re; Vincenzo (Harlow, GB), Willy; Helen Anne (Harlow, GB)
Assignee: Glaxo Group Limited (Brentford, Middlesex, GB)
Application Number:12/966,323
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 9,144,547
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Dosage form; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 9,144,547

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, understanding its scope and claims is crucial for determining its validity, enforceability, and potential impact on the market. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 9,144,547, exploring its claims, the patent landscape, and relevant legal and technical aspects.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of a patent, defining the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. The claims must be clear, concise, and supported by the patent's description and drawings[4].

Patent 9,144,547 Overview

To analyze the scope and claims of U.S. Patent 9,144,547, one must first identify the patent's title, inventors, and the assignee. Here is a general outline of what such an analysis might entail:

Title and Abstract

The title and abstract provide a brief summary of the invention. This initial information helps in understanding the broad category and purpose of the patent.

Background of the Invention

The background section explains the context in which the invention was developed, including any prior art and the problems the invention aims to solve.

Summary of the Invention

This section provides a detailed overview of the invention, including its key features and how it differs from prior art.

Claims Analysis

Independent and Dependent Claims

Patent claims are categorized into independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims[4].

Claim Construction

Claim construction is a critical step in understanding the scope of the patent. This involves interpreting the meaning of the claim terms, which can be a complex process involving legal and technical expertise. The courts often play a role in claim construction, as seen in cases like Contour IP Holding LLC v. GoPro, Inc., where the court had to construe disputed claim terms[5].

Patent Landscape

Prior Art and Novelty

To assess the validity of a patent, it is essential to examine the prior art. This involves searching existing patents, published applications, and other relevant documents to ensure the invention is novel and non-obvious. Tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search and the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) database are invaluable for this purpose[1][4].

Global Dossier and International Considerations

For patents with international implications, the Global Dossier service provides access to file histories of related applications from participating IP offices. This helps in understanding the global patent family and any office actions or citations related to the patent[4].

Legal Considerations

Patentability Under 35 U.S.C. ยง 101

The patentability of an invention must comply with Section 101 of the Patent Act, which states that only new and useful processes, machines, manufactures, or compositions of matter, or any improvements thereof, are eligible for patents. Exceptions include laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas, as outlined in the Alice test[5].

The Alice Test

The Alice test is a two-step process to determine if a patent claim is directed to patent-ineligible subject matter. Step one involves determining if the claim is directed to an abstract idea. If so, step two assesses whether the claim includes elements that transform it into a patent-eligible application[5].

Technical Aspects

Detailed Description and Drawings

The detailed description and drawings of the patent provide the technical specifics of the invention. These sections must enable a person of ordinary skill in the relevant field to make and use the invention.

Examples and Embodiments

Examples and embodiments within the patent help illustrate how the invention can be implemented. These are crucial for understanding the practical application of the claimed invention.

Economic and Market Impact

Patent Claims Research Dataset

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset can provide insights into the economic and market impact of patents. This dataset includes detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications, which can be used to analyze patent scope and trends[3].

Industry Expert Insights

Industry experts and legal practitioners often provide valuable insights into the market impact of patents. For instance, the consultative group for the ACUS study on a small claims patent court included experts who could offer perspectives on the economic and legal implications of patent disputes[2].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: Understanding the independent and dependent claims is crucial for determining the scope of the patent.
  • Prior Art and Novelty: Ensuring the invention is novel and non-obvious involves thorough prior art searches.
  • Legal Compliance: The patent must comply with Section 101 of the Patent Act and pass the Alice test if it involves abstract ideas.
  • Technical Specifics: The detailed description and drawings are essential for understanding the technical aspects of the invention.
  • Market Impact: Analyzing the patent landscape and using datasets like the USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset can provide insights into the economic and market impact.

FAQs

  1. What is the purpose of the claims in a patent?

    • The claims define the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent.
  2. How do you determine if a patent claim is directed to an abstract idea?

    • This is determined using the Alice test, a two-step process that assesses whether the claim is directed to an abstract idea and if it includes elements that transform it into a patent-eligible application.
  3. What tools are available for searching prior art?

    • Tools include the USPTO's Patent Public Search, the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) database, and the Global Dossier service.
  4. Why is claim construction important?

    • Claim construction is crucial for understanding the scope of the patent and can significantly impact patent disputes and enforcement.
  5. How can the USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset be used?

    • The dataset can be used to analyze patent scope, trends, and the economic impact of patents by providing detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications.

Sources

  1. Clemson University Libraries - Advanced Patent Searching

  2. Administrative Conference of the United States - U.S. Patent Small Claims Court

  3. United States Patent and Trademark Office - Patent Claims Research Dataset

  4. United States Patent and Trademark Office - Search for Patents

  5. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - Contour IP Holding LLC v. GoPro, Inc.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,144,547

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 9,144,547

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom0203296.9Feb 12, 2002
United Kingdom0203297.7Feb 12, 2002
United Kingdom0203298.5Feb 12, 2002

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.