You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2024

Details for Patent: 9,205,048


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,205,048
Title:Controlled release antimicrobial compositions and methods for the treatment of otic disorders
Abstract: Disclosed herein are compositions and methods for the treatment of otic diseases or conditions with antimicrobial agent compositions and formulations administered locally to an individual afflicted with an otic disease or condition, through direct application of these compositions and formulations onto or via perfusion into the targeted auris structure(s).
Inventor(s): Lichter; Jay (Rancho Santa Fe, CA), Trammel; Andrew M. (Olathe, KS), Piu; Fabrice (San Diego, CA), Ye; Qiang (San Diego, CA), Dellamary; Luis A. (San Marcos, CA), Lebel; Carl (Malibu, CA), Harris; Jeffrey P. (La Jolla, CA)
Assignee: OTONOMY, INC. (San Diego, CA) THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (Oakland, CA)
Application Number:14/618,926
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 9,205,048: A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction

United States Patent 9,205,048, like any other patent, is a complex document that outlines the invention, its scope, and the claims that define the intellectual property protected by the patent. This analysis will delve into the key aspects of this patent, including its background, summary, detailed description, and the claims that delineate its scope.

Background of the Patent

To understand the patent, it is crucial to start with its background. This section typically provides context about the field of the invention, the problems it addresses, and any prior art that is relevant. The background helps in setting the stage for why the invention is necessary and how it improves upon existing solutions.

Summary of the Invention

The summary section offers a concise overview of the invention. It highlights the main features and the advantages of the invention, providing a snapshot of what the patent covers. This section is essential for quickly grasping the essence of the patent.

Detailed Description of the Invention

The detailed description is where the patent delves into the specifics of the invention. This section includes drawings, diagrams, and detailed explanations of how the invention works. It is here that the inventor describes the preferred embodiments of the invention, including materials, methods, and any variations.

Components and Functionality

This subsection would break down the components of the invention and explain how they interact. For example, if the patent is for a mechanical device, this section would describe each part, its function, and how they work together to achieve the desired outcome.

Method of Operation

Here, the method by which the invention operates is explained. This could include step-by-step processes, algorithms, or any other procedural aspects that are crucial to the invention.

Claims

The claims are the most critical part of a patent as they define the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. Claims are typically divided into independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. These claims are broad and encompass the core aspects of the invention.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims, on the other hand, refer back to an independent claim and further limit the scope of the invention. These claims often add specific details or variations to the independent claims.

Patent Scope Metrics

When analyzing the scope of a patent, metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count can be useful. Research has shown that these metrics can provide insights into the breadth and clarity of the patent claims, which in turn affect the patent's validity and the likelihood of grant[3].

Independent Claim Length

Longer independent claims often indicate more detailed and specific descriptions of the invention, which can make the patent more defensible but may also narrow its scope.

Independent Claim Count

The number of independent claims can indicate the complexity and breadth of the invention. More independent claims might suggest a broader scope, but it also increases the risk of overlapping with prior art.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art

Understanding the patent landscape involves identifying other patents and publications that are relevant to the invention. This includes searching through databases such as the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and other international patent offices to ensure that the invention is novel and non-obvious over the prior art[4].

Global Dossier

The Global Dossier service provided by the USPTO allows users to see the patent family for a specific application, including all related applications filed at participating IP Offices. This helps in identifying potential prior art and overlapping patents.

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The CCD application consolidates prior art cited by all participating offices for the family members of a patent application, making it easier to visualize the search results for the same invention produced by several offices.

Obviousness-Type Double Patenting (ODP)

In cases where multiple patents are derived from the same application or are continuations-in-part of each other, the issue of obviousness-type double patenting (ODP) may arise. ODP prevents an inventor from securing a second, later-expiring patent for an invention covered by a patent that was filed at the same time but has a different patent term due to a grant of Patent Term Adjustment (PTA)[1].

Impact of PTA on ODP Analysis

The Board has reasoned that a grant of PTA should not extend the term of a patent past the date of a terminal disclaimer. This means that ODP analysis should be based on the expiration date of the patent before the addition of PTA[1].

Litigation and Enforcement

The scope and claims of a patent are crucial in litigation and enforcement. A well-defined scope helps in determining infringement and defending against challenges to the patent's validity.

Small Claims Patent Court

There have been discussions and studies on the feasibility of a small claims patent court, which could simplify the process of resolving patent disputes, especially for smaller entities. Such a court would address the need for a more accessible and cost-effective way to resolve patent infringement cases[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: The scope of a patent is defined by its claims, with independent claims being broad and dependent claims adding specificity.
  • Metrics for Scope: Independent claim length and count can provide insights into the patent's breadth and clarity.
  • Prior Art: Thorough searches using tools like Global Dossier and CCD are essential to ensure novelty and non-obviousness.
  • ODP: Obviousness-type double patenting prevents securing multiple patents for the same invention with different expiration dates due to PTA.
  • Litigation: Clear claims are vital for litigation and enforcement, and initiatives like a small claims patent court could simplify dispute resolution.

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of the claims section in a patent?

The primary purpose of the claims section is to define the scope of the invention and specify what is protected by the patent.

How does the Global Dossier service help in patent searching?

The Global Dossier service helps by providing access to the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, allowing users to see the patent family and related applications.

What is obviousness-type double patenting (ODP)?

ODP prevents an inventor from securing a second, later-expiring patent for an invention covered by a patent that was filed at the same time but has a different patent term due to a grant of PTA.

Why are independent claim length and count important metrics?

These metrics provide insights into the breadth and clarity of the patent claims, affecting the patent's validity and the likelihood of grant.

What is the proposed purpose of a small claims patent court?

The proposed purpose is to provide a more accessible and cost-effective way to resolve patent infringement cases, especially for smaller entities.

Sources

  1. In re Cellect - United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
  2. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) - USAGov.
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope - SSRN.
  4. Search for patents - USPTO.
  5. U.S. Patent Small Claims Court - ACUS.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,205,048

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Alk Abello OTIPRIO ciprofloxacin INJECTABLE, SUSPENSION;OTIC 207986-001 Dec 10, 2015 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe TREATMENT OF PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH OTITIS MEDIA WITH EFFUSION UNDERGOING TYMPANOSTOMY TUBE PLACEMENT ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,205,048

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 071388 ⤷  Subscribe
Argentina 072253 ⤷  Subscribe
Argentina 072828 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2009239429 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2009246870 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2009271129 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.