You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 9,216,183


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,216,183
Title:Topical treatment for chemotherapy induced eyelash loss or hypotrichosis using prostamide F2 alpha agonists
Abstract: The present invention is directed to compositions and methods for the treatment of post-chemotherapeutic hypotrichosis. More specifically, the present invention is directed to the use of compositions comprising bimatoprost for the treatment of post-chemotherapeutic hypotrichosis which may be applied before, during and after receiving chemotherapeutic treatment.
Inventor(s): Ahluwalia; Gurpreet (Orange, CA), Beddingfield; Frederick C. (Pacific Palisades, CA), Edwards; Sydney (Aliso Viejo, CA), Whitcup; Scott M. (Laguna Hills, CA)
Assignee: Allergan, Inc. (Irvine, CA)
Application Number:14/251,394
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 9,216,183
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 9,216,183

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for determining its protection, potential infringements, and strategic business decisions. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 9,216,183, focusing on its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape.

Patent Overview

United States Patent 9,216,183, issued on December 15, 2015, is associated with a specific technological innovation, though the exact details of this patent are not provided in the sources. However, we can infer general principles from similar patents and patent analytics techniques.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent defines the boundaries of what is protected under the patent. This includes the specific claims, the technology or method described, and any variations or embodiments covered.

Claim Structure

Patents typically consist of multiple claims, each describing a different aspect of the invention. These claims can be independent or dependent, with dependent claims building upon the independent ones. The claims in a patent like 9,216,183 would be carefully crafted to cover the core invention and its various implementations[3].

Scope Concepts

To analyze the scope effectively, patent analytics often categorize claims by overarching scope concepts. These concepts help in filtering, searching, and analyzing large numbers of patent claims concurrently. This method ensures that all aspects of the invention are covered and that there are no gaps in the protection[3].

Claims Analysis

The claims section of a patent is the most critical part, as it defines what is legally protected.

Independent Claims

Independent claims stand alone and define the broadest scope of the invention. These claims are essential as they set the foundation for the dependent claims.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims. They provide additional details and specific embodiments of the invention, offering a more detailed description of how the invention can be implemented.

Patent Landscape

The patent landscape includes all relevant patents and intellectual property related to the technology or field of the patent in question.

Competitor Patents

Analyzing competitor patents helps in understanding the existing intellectual property landscape. This involves identifying similar patents, their claims, and the scope of protection they offer. For example, in the field of pharmaceuticals, patents like those related to eicosanoids and prostaglandins for ocular treatments show a complex landscape with multiple players and overlapping claims[1].

Claim Coverage Matrix

A Claim Coverage Matrix is a tool used to map which patents and claims are actively protecting specific technologies. This matrix helps in identifying gaps or opportunities in the current patent portfolio. It categorizes patents by claims and scope concepts, making it easier to review and analyze large numbers of patent claims[3].

Interactive Claim Charts

Interactive claim charts generated by tools like ClaimScape® software are useful for reviewing patent coverage with technical experts. These charts help in determining whether a particular scope concept is applicable to a target product or method, highlighting areas where there may be gaps in current coverage and potential future design opportunities[3].

Strategic Implications

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent like 9,216,183 has significant strategic implications.

Licensing and Collaboration

Knowing the exact scope and claims can facilitate licensing agreements and collaborations. Companies can identify areas where their technologies overlap and negotiate mutually beneficial agreements.

Infringement Analysis

Conducting thorough infringement analysis is crucial to avoid legal disputes. By comparing the claims of 9,216,183 with existing products or methods, companies can determine if there is any potential infringement.

Innovation and Development

The patent landscape analysis can guide innovation and development. By identifying gaps in the current coverage, companies can focus on developing new technologies that are not yet protected by existing patents.

Case Studies and Analogies

To better understand the importance of patent scope and claims, let's consider an analogy from the pharmaceutical industry. Patents related to prostaglandins for treating ocular hypertension and glaucoma, such as those described in EP0093380A3, demonstrate how detailed claims can protect specific uses and formulations of a drug. This level of detail is crucial for ensuring that the patent holder's intellectual property is fully protected[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Detailed Claims: The claims section of a patent is critical and must be carefully crafted to cover all aspects of the invention.
  • Scope Concepts: Categorizing claims by scope concepts helps in analyzing large numbers of patent claims efficiently.
  • Patent Landscape: Understanding the broader patent landscape is essential for identifying gaps, opportunities, and potential infringements.
  • Strategic Implications: Knowing the scope and claims of a patent can facilitate licensing, avoid infringement, and guide innovation.

FAQs

Q: What is the importance of independent claims in a patent? A: Independent claims define the broadest scope of the invention and set the foundation for dependent claims, ensuring comprehensive protection of the intellectual property.

Q: How does a Claim Coverage Matrix help in patent analysis? A: A Claim Coverage Matrix helps in mapping which patents and claims are actively protecting specific technologies, identifying gaps or opportunities in the current patent portfolio.

Q: What are interactive claim charts, and how are they used? A: Interactive claim charts are tools generated by software like ClaimScape® to review patent coverage with technical experts, helping determine if a particular scope concept is applicable to a target product or method.

Q: Why is understanding the patent landscape crucial for business strategy? A: Understanding the patent landscape helps in identifying gaps, opportunities, and potential infringements, guiding licensing agreements, innovation, and development strategies.

Q: How can companies use patent analytics to enhance their intellectual property protection? A: Companies can use patent analytics to categorize patents by claims and scope concepts, track patents by claims and scope concepts, and generate interactive claim charts to ensure comprehensive protection and identify future design opportunities.

Sources

  1. Use of eicosanoids and their derivatives for treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma - Google Patents
  2. Ex Parte Beddingfield et al - Casetext
  3. Patent Analytics - SLWIP
  4. Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations - DrugPatentWatch
  5. Hair-growing Agent - Unified Patents

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,216,183

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.