You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 25, 2024

Details for Patent: 9,474,869


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,474,869
Title:Medicament delivery device for administration of opioid antagonists including formulations for naloxone
Abstract: Medicament delivery devices for administration of opioid antagonists are described herein. In some embodiments, an apparatus includes a housing, a medicament container disposed within the housing and an energy storage member disposed within the housing. The medicament container is filled with a naloxone composition that includes naloxone or salts thereof, a tonicity-adjusting agent, and a pH adjusting agent, whereby the osmolality of the naloxone composition ranges from about 250-350 mOsm and the pH ranges from about 3-5. The energy storage member is configured to produce a force to deliver the naloxone composition.
Inventor(s): Edwards; Eric S. (Moseley, VA), Edwards; Evan T. (Charlottesville, VA), Licata; Mark J. (Doswell, VA), Blondino; Frank E. (Henrico, VA)
Assignee: kaleo, Inc. (Richmond, VA)
Application Number:14/694,725
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Delivery; Device; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of a U.S. Patent: A Detailed Guide Using United States Patent 9,474,869 as an Example

Introduction

When analyzing the scope and claims of a U.S. patent, it is crucial to understand the various components and how they interact to define the patent's boundaries. This article will use United States Patent 9,474,869 as a case study to delve into the intricacies of patent scope and claims.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of a patent, defining the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. They are typically divided into independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. They are broad and encompass the core aspects of the invention[3].

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refer back to an independent claim and further limit the scope of the invention. They often add specific details or variations to the independent claims.

Measuring Patent Scope

The scope of a patent can be measured using various metrics, including independent claim length and independent claim count.

Independent Claim Length

Longer independent claims often indicate a narrower scope, as they include more specific details to distinguish the invention from prior art. Conversely, shorter claims may suggest a broader scope but can be more vulnerable to challenges of invalidity due to lack of clarity or overbreadth[3].

Independent Claim Count

A higher number of independent claims can indicate a broader scope, as it suggests the invention is being claimed from multiple angles. However, this can also complicate the patent and increase the risk of inconsistencies or overlaps between claims[3].

Patent Search and Prior Art

Before analyzing a specific patent, it is essential to conduct a thorough patent search to identify prior art.

Tools for Patent Search

The USPTO provides several tools for patent searching, including the Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and the Public Search Facility. These resources help in identifying related applications and prior art that could impact the validity and scope of the patent[1].

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The CCD application consolidates citation data from participating IP offices, allowing users to visualize the prior art cited by multiple offices for the same invention. This is crucial in ensuring that the patent claims do not overlap with existing prior art[1].

Claim Construction and Validity

Claim construction is a critical step in determining the scope of a patent.

Claim Construction Process

Claim construction involves interpreting the language of the claims to understand what is covered by the patent. This process is a question of law and is reviewed de novo on appeal. The court must ensure that the claims inform those skilled in the art with reasonable certainty what is claimed[2].

Validity Challenges

Patents are accompanied by a presumption of validity, but this can be challenged through various means, such as inter partes review (IPR) or district court proceedings. Challenges often focus on issues like anticipation, written description, and indefiniteness[2].

Case Study: United States Patent 9,474,869

Overview of the Patent

To analyze the scope and claims of United States Patent 9,474,869, one must first understand the invention itself. This involves reading the abstract, description, and claims to grasp the core concepts and how they are protected.

Claim Analysis

  • Independent Claims: Identify the independent claims and analyze their length and specificity. Are they broad or narrow? Do they clearly define the invention?
  • Dependent Claims: Review the dependent claims to see how they further limit the scope of the independent claims. Are there any inconsistencies or overlaps?

Prior Art and Citation Data

Use tools like the CCD application to see if there are any prior art citations that could impact the validity of the claims. Check if the patent family includes related applications from other IP offices through the Global Dossier[1].

Claim Construction and Validity

Consider how the claims might be constructed in a legal context. Are the claims clear and definite? Have there been any challenges to the patent's validity, such as IPR petitions or district court actions?

Historical Context and Patent Landscape

Understanding the historical context and the broader patent landscape can provide insights into the patent's significance and potential challenges.

Historical Patents

For historical patents, resources like the NYPL Libguides and the USPTO's historical patent databases can be invaluable. These resources help in tracing the evolution of similar inventions and identifying potential prior art[4].

Current Patent Trends

Stay updated with current trends in patent law and policy, such as discussions around patent quality and the potential for a small claims patent court. These trends can influence how patents are viewed and enforced[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: The scope of a patent is primarily defined by its claims, which must be clear, definite, and non-obvious.
  • Patent Search: Thorough patent searching is essential to ensure the patent does not overlap with prior art.
  • Claim Construction: Claim construction is a legal process that determines the scope of the patent and is subject to judicial review.
  • Validity Challenges: Patents can face various validity challenges, and understanding these is crucial for maintaining patent protection.
  • Historical and Current Context: Understanding the historical and current patent landscape helps in assessing the patent's significance and potential challenges.

FAQs

Q: What is the primary purpose of patent claims?

A: The primary purpose of patent claims is to define the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent.

Q: How can the scope of a patent be measured?

A: The scope of a patent can be measured using metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count.

Q: What is the Common Citation Document (CCD) application?

A: The CCD application consolidates citation data from participating IP offices to help visualize prior art for a patent application.

Q: Why is claim construction important?

A: Claim construction is important because it determines the scope of the patent and is subject to judicial review, impacting the patent's validity and enforceability.

Q: What are some common challenges to patent validity?

A: Common challenges to patent validity include anticipation, written description, and indefiniteness, often raised through inter partes review (IPR) or district court proceedings.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. CAFC - VASCULAR SOLUTIONS LLC v. MEDTRONIC, INC.: https://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/24-1398.OPINION.9-16-2024_2384927.pdf
  3. SSRN - Patent Claims and Patent Scope: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2844964
  4. NYPL Libguides - How to Search for an Historical U.S. Patent: https://libguides.nypl.org/patents/historical_patents
  5. ACUS - U.S. Patent Small Claims Court: https://www.acus.gov/research-projects/us-patent-small-claims-court

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,474,869

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Kaleo Inc EVZIO naloxone hydrochloride SOLUTION;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 205787-001 Apr 3, 2014 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y USE OF A DELIVERY DEVICE TO ADMINISTER A DOSE OF NALOXONE ⤷  Subscribe
Kaleo Inc EVZIO (AUTOINJECTOR) naloxone hydrochloride SOLUTION;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 209862-001 Oct 19, 2016 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y USE OF A DELIVERY DEVICE TO ADMINISTER A DOSE OF NALOXONE ⤷  Subscribe
Kaleo Inc NALOXONE HYDROCHLORIDE (AUTOINJECTOR) naloxone hydrochloride SOLUTION;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 215457-001 Feb 28, 2022 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y USE OF A DELIVERY DEVICE TO ADMINISTER A DOSE OF NALOXONE ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.