You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 2, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,492,443


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,492,443
Title:Abuse deterrent compositions and methods of making same
Abstract: This invention relates a therapeutic pharmaceutical composition comprising: a mixture including an opioid; polyethylene oxide in an amount of about 3 to about 40 wt % of the composition; a disintegrant; and a surfactant; wherein the disintegrant is present in an amount sufficient to cause the pharmaceutical composition to exhibit an immediate release profile.
Inventor(s): Kumar; Vijai (Morris Plains, NJ), Dixon; David (Woodside, NY), Tewari; Divya (West Chester, PA), Wadgaonkar; Dilip B. (Suffern, NY)
Assignee: ACURA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (Palatine, IL)
Application Number:14/339,143
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 9,492,443: A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction

Patent analysis is a crucial step in understanding the intellectual property landscape, particularly for businesses and inventors looking to protect their innovations or avoid infringement. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 9,492,443, examining its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape.

Patent Overview

United States Patent 9,492,443 is a specific patent that, like all patents, contains detailed descriptions of an invention, claims that define the scope of the invention, and background information on the prior art.

Patent Title and Abstract

To begin, it is essential to identify the title and abstract of the patent, which provide a high-level overview of the invention. The title typically reflects the main subject matter, while the abstract summarizes the key aspects of the invention.

Background of the Invention

The background section explains the context in which the invention was developed, including any problems or limitations of existing solutions. This section helps in understanding the motivation behind the invention and its potential impact.

Claims Analysis

Claim Structure

Patent claims are the heart of any patent, as they define the legal boundaries of the invention. Claims must be clear, concise, and particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter of the invention[2].

Independent Claims

Independent claims stand alone and do not refer to any other claims. They are crucial because they define the broadest scope of the invention.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refer back to an independent claim or another dependent claim and further limit the scope of the invention. These claims often add specific details or variations to the independent claims.

Claim Interpretation

The interpretation of claims is a critical aspect of patent analysis. Claims must be read in light of the specification, the prosecution history, and the prior art to understand their full scope. The Federal Circuit has emphasized that claims must inform those skilled in the art about the scope of the invention with reasonable certainty[2].

Scope of the Invention

Technical Details

The specification of the patent provides detailed technical descriptions of the invention, including drawings, diagrams, and examples. This section is vital for understanding how the invention works and its various components.

Novelty and Non-Obviousness

The scope of the invention must also be evaluated in terms of novelty and non-obviousness. The invention must be new and not obvious to those skilled in the art, based on the prior art available at the time of the invention.

Patent Landscape

Prior Art

Understanding the prior art is essential for assessing the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention. The Common Citation Document (CCD) and other tools like the Patent Public Search can help in identifying relevant prior art cited by multiple patent offices[1].

Related Patents

Analyzing related patents, including those in the same patent family or those that cite the patent in question, can provide insights into the broader patent landscape. Tools like Global Dossier can be used to view the patent family and related applications from participating IP offices[1].

Industry Context

The patent landscape is also influenced by the industry context. For example, in the pharmaceutical industry, patents like those related to abuse-deterrent technologies (e.g., U.S. Patent 9,101,636) play a significant role in protecting innovative products[4].

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

Patent Validity

The validity of a patent can be challenged on grounds such as indefiniteness, lack of novelty, or non-obviousness. Recent court cases, such as Maxell, Ltd. v. Amperex Technology Limited, highlight the importance of clear and distinct claims[2].

Infringement and Litigation

Understanding the scope of the claims is crucial for determining potential infringement. Companies must ensure that their products do not infringe on existing patents, and patent holders must be prepared to enforce their rights through litigation if necessary[4].

Economic and Strategic Implications

Market Impact

Patents can significantly impact market dynamics by providing exclusive rights to the patent holder. This can influence market share, competitive strategies, and the overall economic landscape of an industry.

Licensing and Collaboration

Patents can also be used as a tool for collaboration and licensing. For instance, companies may license their patents to other entities, which can expand their market reach and generate revenue[4].

Tools and Resources for Patent Analysis

USPTO Resources

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) provides several resources for patent analysis, including the Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and the Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs)[1].

Datasets and Research

The USPTO also offers datasets like the Patent Claims Research Dataset, which contains detailed information on claims from US patents and applications. These datasets can be used to analyze trends and patterns in patent claims[3].

Best Practices for Conducting a Patent Search

Preliminary Search

Conducting a preliminary patent search is essential before filing a patent application. This involves using tools like the Patent Public Search and consulting resources such as the USPTO's Public Search Facility and PTRCs[1].

Advanced Search Techniques

Advanced search techniques, including the use of classification systems and citation data, can help in identifying relevant prior art and related patents.

Key Takeaways

  • Clear Claims: Patent claims must be clear, concise, and distinctly claim the subject matter of the invention.
  • Scope Analysis: Understanding the scope of the invention involves analyzing the claims, specification, and prior art.
  • Industry Context: The patent landscape is influenced by industry-specific considerations and regulatory requirements.
  • Legal Considerations: Patent validity and infringement are critical legal aspects that must be considered.
  • Economic Impact: Patents can significantly impact market dynamics and economic strategies.

FAQs

Q: What is the importance of clear and distinct claims in a patent?

A: Clear and distinct claims are crucial because they define the legal boundaries of the invention and must inform those skilled in the art about the scope of the invention with reasonable certainty[2].

Q: How can I conduct a preliminary patent search?

A: You can conduct a preliminary patent search using the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool, consulting resources like the Public Search Facility, and seeking assistance from PTRCs[1].

Q: What is the role of the Global Dossier in patent analysis?

A: The Global Dossier provides access to the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, allowing users to see the patent family, dossier, classification, and citation data for these applications[1].

Q: How do datasets like the Patent Claims Research Dataset help in patent analysis?

A: These datasets contain detailed information on claims from US patents and applications, enabling the analysis of trends and patterns in patent claims and scope measurements[3].

Q: Why is understanding the prior art important in patent analysis?

A: Understanding the prior art is essential for assessing the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention and for identifying relevant citations and related patents[1].

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. MAXELL, LTD. v. AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY LIMITED: https://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/23-1194.OPINION.3-6-2024_2281183.pdf
  3. USPTO - Patent Claims Research Dataset: https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  4. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION - Annual Report: https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/a/NASDAQ_ACUR_2016.pdf

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,492,443

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
No data available in table
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries

International Family Members for US Patent 9,492,443

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Australia 2004294953 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 2010200979 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 2013206525 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 2015264950 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 2017239544 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2547334 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 6 of 6 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.