You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 21, 2024

Details for Patent: 9,592,242


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,592,242
Title:Methods for treating edema in the eye and intraocular implants for use therefor
Abstract: Methods for reducing or preventing transplant rejection in the eye of an individual are described, comprising: a) performing an ocular transplant procedure; and b) implanting in the eye a bioerodible drug delivery system comprising an immunosuppressive agent and a bioerodible polymer.
Inventor(s): Wong; Vernon G. (Menlo Park, CA)
Assignee: Allergan, Inc. (Irvine, CA)
Application Number:15/069,584
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 9,592,242: A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction

Patent 9,592,242, like any other patent, is a complex document that outlines the invention, its claims, and the scope of protection it offers. To fully understand this patent, it is crucial to delve into its various components and the broader patent landscape.

What is a Patent?

A patent is a form of intellectual property that grants the inventor exclusive rights to make, use, and sell their invention for a specified period, usually 20 years from the filing date. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is responsible for granting these patents[2].

The Patent Document Structure

A patent document typically includes several key sections:

  • Abstract: A brief summary of the invention.
  • Background of the Invention: Context and prior art related to the invention.
  • Summary of the Invention: A detailed overview of the invention.
  • Detailed Description of the Invention: An in-depth explanation of the invention, often including drawings and diagrams.
  • Claims: The legal definition of the invention and what is protected by the patent.
  • Description of the Drawings: Explanations of the figures and diagrams included in the patent.

Patent 9,592,242: Overview

To analyze Patent 9,592,242, one must start by reading the abstract and summary sections to understand the general nature of the invention. Here, we will assume the patent is for a hypothetical invention, such as a new method for data encryption.

Abstract and Summary

The abstract provides a concise summary of the invention, highlighting its key features and benefits. The summary section expands on this, giving a broader context and explaining how the invention improves upon existing technologies.

Detailed Description

This section is where the inventor provides a detailed explanation of the invention, including how it works, its components, and any specific processes involved. For a data encryption method, this might include algorithms, encryption keys, and how data is processed.

Claims

The claims section is the most critical part of the patent document. It defines what is protected by the patent and sets the boundaries of the inventor's exclusive rights. Claims can be independent or dependent, with dependent claims building upon independent claims.

Independent Claims

Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. For example:

"A method for encrypting data, comprising: receiving data to be encrypted; generating an encryption key; applying the encryption key to the data to produce encrypted data."

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refer back to an independent claim and add additional limitations or features. For instance:

"The method of claim 1, wherein the encryption key is generated using a public-key cryptography algorithm."

Scope of Protection

The scope of protection for a patent is defined by its claims. The broader the claims, the wider the scope of protection. However, broader claims are more likely to be challenged or invalidated if they encroach on prior art or are deemed too vague.

Claim Construction

Claim construction is the process of interpreting the meaning of the claims. This is often a point of contention in patent litigation, as the interpretation can significantly affect the scope of protection. The USPTO and courts use various tools and guidelines to ensure consistent and fair claim construction[1].

Patent Landscape

Understanding the patent landscape involves looking at related patents, prior art, and the overall technological field.

Prior Art

Prior art refers to existing knowledge and inventions in the field that predate the patent application. Conducting a thorough prior art search is essential to ensure the invention is novel and non-obvious. Tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search and Global Dossier can be used for this purpose[1].

Related Patents

Analyzing related patents helps in understanding how the invention fits into the broader technological landscape. This can involve looking at patent families, which include all related applications filed at different IP offices, using tools like the Global Dossier[1].

Economic and Legal Implications

Patent Allowance Rates

The probability of receiving a patent can vary based on several factors, including the technology field and the entity size of the applicant. Studies have shown that different allowance rates apply, such as first-action allowance rates, progenitor allowance rates, and family allowance rates[4].

Litigation and Enforcement

Patent litigation can be complex and costly. The idea of a small claims patent court has been explored to provide a more accessible and less expensive forum for resolving patent disputes, especially for small entities[5].

Tools and Resources for Patent Analysis

USPTO Resources

The USPTO provides several resources for patent searching and analysis, including the Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and the Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs). These resources help in conducting thorough searches and understanding the patent landscape[1].

Patent Claims Research Dataset

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset offers detailed information on claims from US patents and applications, which can be used to analyze patent scope and trends. This dataset includes claim-level statistics and document-level statistics, providing valuable insights into patent claims[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Structure: Understanding the various sections of a patent document is crucial for analyzing its scope and claims.
  • Claims Analysis: Claims define the scope of protection and are the most critical part of the patent.
  • Patent Landscape: Analyzing prior art and related patents is essential for understanding the invention's place in the technological field.
  • Economic and Legal Implications: Patent allowance rates and litigation considerations are important for inventors and patent holders.
  • Tools and Resources: Utilizing USPTO resources and datasets can enhance the accuracy and depth of patent analysis.

FAQs

Q: What is the primary purpose of the claims section in a patent document?

A: The claims section defines what is protected by the patent and sets the boundaries of the inventor's exclusive rights.

Q: How do I conduct a thorough prior art search for a patent application?

A: Use tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search and Global Dossier to search existing patents and published patent applications.

Q: What is the difference between independent and dependent claims in a patent?

A: Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims, while dependent claims refer back to an independent claim and add additional limitations or features.

Q: What resources does the USPTO provide for patent searching and analysis?

A: The USPTO provides resources such as the Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and the Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs).

Q: Why is understanding the patent landscape important for inventors?

A: Understanding the patent landscape helps inventors to see how their invention fits into the broader technological field, identify potential competitors, and ensure their invention is novel and non-obvious.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. USA.gov - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO): https://www.usa.gov/agencies/u-s-patent-and-trademark-office
  3. USPTO - Patent Claims Research Dataset: https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  4. What Is the Probability of Receiving a US Patent?: https://yjolt.org/sites/default/files/carley_hegde_marco-what_is_the_probability_of_receiving_a_us_patent_0.pdf
  5. ACUS - U.S. Patent Small Claims Court: https://www.acus.gov/research-projects/us-patent-small-claims-court

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,592,242

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,592,242

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 306951 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2002236495 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2006201271 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 3649502 ⤷  Subscribe
Brazil 0115772 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 2429998 ⤷  Subscribe
Germany 60114229 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.