You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 9,745,290


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 9,745,290 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 9,745,290 protects ONGENTYS and is included in one NDA.

This patent has thirty-one patent family members in twenty-three countries.

Summary for Patent: 9,745,290
Title:Dosage regimen for COMT inhibitors
Abstract: The invention relates to the use of an oxodiazolyl compound (I) for the preparation of a medicament for the prevention or treatment of central and peripheral nervous system associated disorders, wherein said medicament is administered according to a dosing regimen having a dosing periodicity ranging from about twice a day to about once every other day.
Inventor(s): Learmonth; David Alexander (Valongo, PT), Kiss; Laszlo Erno (Lavra, PT), Palma; Pedro Nuno Leal (Leca da Palmeira, PT), Ferreira; Humberto dos Santos (S. Mamede do Coronado, PT), Soares da Silva; Patricio Manuel V. A. (Porto, PT)
Assignee: BIAL--PORTELA & CA, S.A. (Sao Mamede do Coronado, PT)
Application Number:14/689,397
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Compound; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 9,745,290: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 9,745,290, exploring its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape.

What is United States Patent 9,745,290?

To begin, it is essential to identify the subject matter of the patent. However, the specific details of Patent 9,745,290 are not provided in the sources. Typically, patents are categorized into utility, design, or plant patents. For this analysis, we will assume it is a utility patent, which is the most common type.

How to Find Patent Information

To analyze a patent, you need to access the patent document. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) provides several tools for this purpose:

  • Patent Public Search: This is a web-based tool that replaces older search tools like PubEast and PubWest. It offers enhanced access to prior art and is a powerful resource for searching patents[4].
  • Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs): These centers provide local search resources and training in patent search techniques[4].

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims define the scope of the invention and are critical for determining what is protected by the patent. Here are some key points to consider:

Types of Claims

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to and further limit an independent claim.

Claim Construction

Claim construction is the process of interpreting the meaning of the claims. This is often a point of contention in patent litigation. The USPTO and courts use various tools, including the patent specification and prosecution history, to construe the claims[3].

Patent Scope and Its Measurement

The scope of a patent is essentially what the patent protects. Here’s how it is measured:

Patent Claims Research Dataset

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents granted between 1976 and 2014. This dataset includes claim-level statistics and document-level statistics, which can help in understanding the scope of patents[3].

Patent Scope Measurements

Research by the USPTO has developed measures of patent scope, such as the number of claims and the dependency between claims. These measures help in assessing the breadth and complexity of a patent's protection[3].

Analyzing the Patent Landscape

The patent landscape includes all relevant patents and applications in a particular field. Here’s how to analyze it:

Identifying Relevant Patents

Use tools like the Patent Public Search or Global Dossier to identify patents related to your invention. These tools provide access to file histories, classification, and citation data[4].

Understanding Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs)

NPEs, also known as patent trolls, play a significant role in patent litigation. According to the GAO, NPEs brought about a fifth of all patent infringement lawsuits between 2007 and 2011[1].

Impact of Legislative Changes

Legislative changes, such as the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), can significantly impact patent litigation. For example, the AIA limited the number of defendants in a lawsuit, leading to an increase in the number of lawsuits filed[1].

Case Study: Analyzing Patent 9,745,290

While specific details of Patent 9,745,290 are not available, here is a general approach to analyzing any patent:

Step 1: Read the Patent Document

Start by reading the patent document to understand the invention, claims, and background.

Step 2: Identify Independent and Dependent Claims

Distinguish between independent and dependent claims to understand the core of the invention and its variations.

Step 3: Analyze Claim Construction

Use the patent specification, prosecution history, and any relevant court decisions to construe the claims.

Step 4: Assess Patent Scope

Use datasets and research tools to measure the scope of the patent, including the number of claims and their dependency.

Step 5: Examine the Patent Landscape

Identify related patents and applications using search tools. Understand the role of NPEs and any legislative changes that might affect the patent.

Example: Software-Related Patents

Software-related patents have seen significant activity. For instance, between 2007 and 2011, lawsuits involving software-related patents accounted for about 89% of the increase in defendants in patent infringement lawsuits[1].

Expert Insights

Industry experts often highlight the importance of thorough patent analysis:

"The quality of issued patents is crucial for maintaining a robust patent system. Analyzing trends in patent infringement litigation can help improve the patent examination process," said a USPTO official in a GAO report[1].

Statistics and Trends

  • Between 2000 and 2010, the number of patent infringement lawsuits in federal courts fluctuated slightly, but increased by about a third from 2010 to 2011[1].
  • The number of overall defendants in patent infringement lawsuits increased by about 129% from 2007 to 2011[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Understand Claims: The claims define the scope of the invention and are critical for determining what is protected.
  • Analyze Scope: Use datasets and research tools to measure the scope of the patent.
  • Examine Landscape: Identify related patents and applications, and understand the role of NPEs and legislative changes.
  • Expert Insights: Industry experts emphasize the importance of thorough patent analysis for maintaining a robust patent system.
  • Statistics: Trends in patent litigation can provide valuable insights into the patent landscape.

FAQs

Q: How do I find the details of a specific patent?

A: You can use the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool or visit a Patent and Trademark Resource Center (PTRC) to find the details of a specific patent[4].

Q: What is the difference between independent and dependent claims?

A: Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit an independent claim.

Q: How do legislative changes affect patent litigation?

A: Legislative changes, such as the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), can impact patent litigation by altering the rules for filing lawsuits and the number of defendants allowed in a single lawsuit[1].

Q: What role do non-practicing entities (NPEs) play in patent litigation?

A: NPEs, or patent trolls, bring a significant portion of patent infringement lawsuits. They accounted for about a fifth of all lawsuits between 2007 and 2011[1].

Q: How can I measure the scope of a patent?

A: Use the USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset and other research tools to measure the scope of a patent, including the number of claims and their dependency[3].

Sources

  1. GAO Report: Assessing Factors That Affect Patent Infringement Litigation[1].
  2. USPTO Website: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office[2].
  3. USPTO Dataset: Patent Claims Research Dataset[3].
  4. USPTO Search Tools: Search for patents - USPTO[4].

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,745,290

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Amneal ONGENTYS opicapone CAPSULE;ORAL 212489-001 Apr 24, 2020 RX Yes No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ADJUNCTIVE TREATMENT TO LEVODOPA/CARBIDOPA IN PATIENTS WITH PARKINSON’S DISEASE EXPERIENCING OFF EPISODES ⤷  Subscribe
Amneal ONGENTYS opicapone CAPSULE;ORAL 212489-002 Apr 24, 2020 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ADJUNCTIVE TREATMENT TO LEVODOPA/CARBIDOPA IN PATIENTS WITH PARKINSON’S DISEASE EXPERIENCING OFF EPISODES ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 9,745,290

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
07002091Jan 31, 2007

International Family Members for US Patent 9,745,290

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2481410 ⤷  Subscribe C02481410/01 Switzerland ⤷  Subscribe
Argentina 065098 ⤷  Subscribe
Argentina 109590 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2007346018 ⤷  Subscribe
Brazil PI0721213 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 2678391 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.