You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 24, 2024

Details for Patent: 9,861,771


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,861,771
Title:Device housing for an aerosol container
Abstract: An assembly having: a container configured to contain a product, the container having an end having a dispensing end surface, a central axis which extends through the end, and a neck underneath the end, the neck having an outer surface which tapers outwardly away from the central axis as it extends in a direction towards the end; an accessory non-removably mounted on the end of the container, the accessory having a surface bearing against the dispensing end surface of the container, and a sleeve disposed about the neck so that an inner surface of the sleeve is in facing relation with the neck outer surface, and; an annular collar wedged between the sleeve inner surface and the neck outer surface and joined to the sleeve inner surface by a permanent joint.
Inventor(s): Brand; Peter John (Ware, GB), Godfrey; James William (Ware, GB), Rand; Paul Kenneth (Ware, GB), Robertson; Duncan (Perth, AU)
Assignee: Glaxo Group Limited (Brentford, Middlesex, GB)
Application Number:15/053,498
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
 
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 9,861,771

To delve into the specifics of the United States Patent 9,861,771, it is crucial to analyze several key aspects, including the patent's claims, the technological landscape, and the broader patent ecosystem.

Patent Overview

United States Patent 9,861,771, like any other patent, is a grant of rights for an invention, and its scope is defined by its claims. The claims are the legal boundaries of what the patent protects.

Claims Analysis

Claim Structure

The claims of a patent are typically divided into independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims[4].

Claim Types

  • Independent Claims: These define the broadest scope of the invention and are usually the most critical.
  • Dependent Claims: These narrow down the invention by adding additional limitations to the independent claims.

Claim Interpretation

The interpretation of claims is crucial for understanding the patent's scope. This involves analyzing the language used in the claims, the specification, and any relevant prosecution history. The Federal Circuit has established guidelines for claim interpretation, emphasizing the importance of understanding the ordinary meaning of the claim terms in the context of the specification and the prosecution history[5].

Technological Landscape

Field of the Invention

To understand the patent's scope, it is essential to identify the field of the invention. This involves reviewing the background of the invention, the summary of the invention, and the detailed description provided in the patent specification.

Prior Art and Novelty

The patent must be novel and non-obvious over the prior art. Analyzing prior art citations and any relevant litigation or office actions can provide insights into how the patent office and courts have viewed the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention[1].

Patent Quality and Examination

The quality of the patent is a significant factor in its validity and enforceability. The USPTO has initiatives to improve patent quality, such as the Enhanced Patent Quality Initiative, which includes measures like correctness checks and compliance targets for examiners[1].

Examination Process

The examination process involves a thorough review by patent examiners to ensure that the patent meets statutory requirements for novelty, non-obviousness, and clarity. The time allotted for examination and the tools used by examiners can impact the quality of the patent[1].

Legal and Policy Considerations

Jurisdiction and Litigation

Patent litigation, such as the case of Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Teva, highlights the importance of claim construction and the analysis of obviousness and indefiniteness. Courts, particularly the Federal Circuit, play a crucial role in interpreting patent claims and determining their validity[5].

Small Claims Patent Court

There have been discussions and studies on the feasibility of a small claims patent court, which could impact how patent disputes are resolved, especially for smaller entities. This could potentially alter the landscape for enforcing and defending patents[2].

Economic and Statistical Insights

Patent Claims Research Dataset

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications, offering insights into patent scope and trends. This dataset can help in understanding the broader patent landscape and how specific patents fit within it[3].

Global Patent System

Global Dossier and Common Citation Document

Tools like the Global Dossier and the Common Citation Document facilitate the integration of the global patent system, allowing for easier access to patent information across different jurisdictions. This can be particularly relevant for patents with international implications[4].

Public Search and Resource Centers

The USPTO's Public Search Facility and Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs) provide valuable resources for searching and understanding patents. These resources can be instrumental in conducting thorough searches and analyzing the scope of a patent[4].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Definition: The claims of a patent define its legal boundaries and are crucial for understanding its scope.
  • Technological Context: Understanding the field of the invention and prior art is essential for assessing the patent's novelty and non-obviousness.
  • Patent Quality: Initiatives like the Enhanced Patent Quality Initiative aim to improve the quality of patents, which is vital for their validity and enforceability.
  • Legal Considerations: Court interpretations and potential reforms like a small claims patent court can significantly impact how patents are enforced and defended.
  • Global Integration: Tools like the Global Dossier and Common Citation Document facilitate global patent integration, making it easier to manage international patent portfolios.

FAQs

What are the key components of a patent claim?

The key components of a patent claim include the preamble, the transitional phrase, and the body of the claim. The preamble introduces the claim, the transitional phrase connects the preamble to the body, and the body defines the invention[4].

How is patent quality measured?

Patent quality is measured through various metrics, including statutory compliance rates for sections like 35 U.S.C. 101, 112, 102, and 103. The USPTO also uses correctness measures and quantifiable compliance targets[1].

What is the role of the Global Dossier in patent searching?

The Global Dossier provides a single portal for accessing file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, facilitating global patent searches and management[4].

Why is claim interpretation important?

Claim interpretation is crucial because it determines the scope of the patent's protection. Incorrect interpretation can lead to invalidation or narrowing of the patent's claims[5].

How does the USPTO ensure patent quality during the examination process?

The USPTO ensures patent quality through initiatives like the Enhanced Patent Quality Initiative, which includes measures such as correctness checks, compliance targets, and analysis of examination time and applicant readiness[1].

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,861,771

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 9,861,771

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom9924468.3Oct 16, 1999
United Kingdom0020538.5Aug 22, 2000

International Family Members for US Patent 9,861,771

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 259744 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 762744 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 7918100 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 8582501 ⤷  Subscribe
Brazil 0014363 ⤷  Subscribe
Brazil 0112481 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 2387160 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.