You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: RE37838


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: RE37838
Title: Composition for contraception
Abstract:A combination product for oral contraception is disclosed comprising an estrogen selected from 2.0 to 6.0 mg of 17.beta.-estradiol and 0.020 mg of ethinylestradiol; and a gestagen selected from .[.0.25 to 0.30 mg of.]. drospirenone and .[.0.1 to 0.2 mg of.]. cyproterone acetate, followed by 5 or 4 pill-free or sugar pill days.
Inventor(s): Spona; Jurgen (Vienna, AT), Dusterberg; Bernd (Berlin, DE), Ludicke; Frank (Geneva, CH)
Assignee: Schering Aktiengesellschaft (DE)
Application Number:09/504,084
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent RE37838
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent RE37838: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for both the patent holder and potential infringers. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent RE37838, exploring its claims, the patent landscape, and the implications of its protection.

What is United States Patent RE37838?

To begin, it is essential to identify the subject matter of the patent. However, since the specific details of RE37838 are not provided in the sources, we will use general principles to analyze its scope and claims.

Claims in a Patent Application

Importance of Claims

Claims are the heart of any patent application, defining the scope of protection granted by the patent. They must be clear, concise, and supported by the description provided in the patent application[5].

Types of Claims

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to and further limit an independent claim.

Drafting Claims

Claims should be drafted broadly enough to cover the invention but narrowly enough to avoid prior art. The process involves careful analysis of the invention and existing patents to ensure novelty and non-obviousness[4].

Analyzing the Claims of RE37838

Independent Claim 1

For a hypothetical example, let's consider a patent like the one in the Lite-Netics LLC v. Nu Tsai Capital LLC case, which involves a light fixture assembly. Independent Claim 1 might read:

  • "A light fixture assembly, comprising: (a) a light bulb socket with an opening at the first end for accommodating a light bulb and at least one opening at the second end, wherein the socket includes a conductor that places a light bulb inserted into the first end in electrical contact with electrical wires inserted through the socket; (b) a base attached to the second end of the light bulb socket; and (c) a neodymium magnet embedded in the base wherein said magnet had a pull strength of at least five pounds."

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims would further specify the invention, for example:

  • "The light fixture assembly of claim 1, wherein the base includes a mounting mechanism for securing the assembly to a surface."

Patent Landscape Analysis

Claim Coverage Matrix

To understand the patent landscape, a Claim Coverage Matrix is useful. This matrix categorizes patents by claims and scope concepts, helping to identify which patents and claims are actively protecting the intellectual property and where gaps or opportunities exist[3].

Scope Concepts

Scope concepts link claims on similar patents, providing a powerful tool for filtering, searching, and analyzing large numbers of patent claims. These concepts can be categorized as high, medium, or low value to the company, indicating their current and future significance[3].

Tracking Patents by Claims and Scope Concepts

Interactive Claim Charts

Tools like ClaimScape® software generate interactive claim charts that can be reviewed by technical experts to determine whether a particular scope concept is applicable to a target product or method. This helps in identifying gaps in current coverage and highlighting future design opportunities[3].

Patent Prosecution and Maintenance

Filing and Examination Process

The process of writing and filing a patent application involves several elements, including the title, abstract, drawings, background of the invention, brief summary, and detailed description of the invention. The examination process can be expedited through programs like Accelerated Examination or Track One Prioritized Examination[4].

Fees and Costs

The costs associated with patent prosecution and maintenance are significant. Official fees vary according to the submitting organization’s size and the type of patent filing. Additional fees are incurred for activities such as responding to Office Actions and appealing examiner decisions[4].

Implications of Patent Protection

Enforcement and Infringement

Patent holders must ensure that their claims are enforceable and that any infringement is addressed. This involves communicating with potential infringers and, if necessary, taking legal action. The case of Lite-Netics LLC v. Nu Tsai Capital LLC illustrates the complexities of patent infringement allegations and the importance of clear claim construction[2].

Licensing and Collaboration

Patents can also be licensed to other companies, allowing for collaboration and revenue generation. However, this must be done carefully to avoid issues like those encountered in the analysis of chemical reactions from US patents, where inconsistencies and missing entries can impact data quality[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Define Protection: The claims in a patent application are crucial for defining the scope of protection.
  • Patent Landscape Analysis: Tools like Claim Coverage Matrix and interactive claim charts help in understanding the patent landscape.
  • Prosecution and Maintenance: The process of filing and maintaining a patent involves significant time and cost.
  • Enforcement and Licensing: Clear claim construction is essential for enforcing patents and licensing them to other companies.

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of claims in a patent application?

The primary purpose of claims in a patent application is to define the scope of protection granted by the patent.

How can the patent landscape be analyzed effectively?

The patent landscape can be analyzed effectively using tools like Claim Coverage Matrix and interactive claim charts, which categorize patents by claims and scope concepts.

What are the costs associated with patent prosecution and maintenance?

The costs include official fees, which vary according to the submitting organization’s size and the type of patent filing, as well as additional fees for activities such as responding to Office Actions and appealing examiner decisions.

How can patent holders enforce their patents?

Patent holders can enforce their patents by communicating with potential infringers and, if necessary, taking legal action to address any infringement.

What are the benefits of licensing patents?

Licensing patents allows for collaboration and revenue generation, but it must be done carefully to avoid issues related to data quality and consistency.

Sources

  1. Noise Analysis and Data Refinement for Chemical Reactions from U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Documents - ChemRxiv
  2. Lite-Netics LLC v. Nu Tsai Capital LLC - CAFC
  3. Patent Analytics - Schwegman
  4. TIMELINE AND COSTS FOR PATENT FILINGS - SBIR
  5. Patents - The Maryland People's Law Library

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent RE37838

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: RE37838

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Germany4344462Dec 22, 1993

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.