You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 23, 2025

Suppliers and packagers for vfend


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


vfend

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDANDA/ANDASupplierPackage CodePackageMarketing Start
Pf Prism Cv VFEND voriconazole FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 021630 NDA Roerig 0049-3160-44 1 BOTTLE in 1 CARTON (0049-3160-44) / 75 mL in 1 BOTTLE 2003-03-28
Pf Prism Cv VFEND voriconazole FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 021630 NDA AUTHORIZED GENERIC Greenstone LLC 59762-0935-3 1 BOTTLE in 1 CARTON (59762-0935-3) / 75 mL in 1 BOTTLE 2013-12-16
Pf Prism Cv VFEND voriconazole INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 021267 NDA Roerig 0049-3190-01 1 VIAL, SINGLE-USE in 1 CARTON (0049-3190-01) / 20 mL in 1 VIAL, SINGLE-USE 2002-05-24
Pf Prism Cv VFEND voriconazole INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 021267 NDA Roerig 0049-3190-28 1 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE in 1 CARTON (0049-3190-28) / 20 mL in 1 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSE 2002-05-24
Pf Prism Cv VFEND voriconazole INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 021267 NDA Roerig 0049-3190-01 1 VIAL, SINGLE-USE in 1 CARTON (0049-3190-01) / 20 mL in 1 VIAL, SINGLE-USE 2003-03-28
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>NDA/ANDA>Supplier>Package Code>Package>Marketing Start
Showing 1 to 5 of 5 entries

Pharmaceutical Suppliers for VFEND® (Voriconazole): A Comprehensive Analysis of the Global Supply Chain

The antifungal medication VFEND® (voriconazole), developed by Pfizer, has been a critical therapeutic agent for invasive fungal infections since its FDA approval in 2002. With the expiration of key patents, the market has seen a proliferation of generic versions and active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) suppliers, particularly from India and China. This report examines the originator’s role, generic manufacturers, API suppliers, regulatory dynamics, and market challenges, drawing on data from patent settlements, FDA approvals, and global supplier networks. Key findings include Mylan’s early market entry with 180-day exclusivity, the dominance of Indian API manufacturers in the generic supply chain, and persistent risks of counterfeit products in unregulated markets[1][2][3][4].


Originator and Patent Landscape of VFEND®

Development and Initial Market Dominance by Pfizer

VFEND® (voriconazole) was developed by Pfizer and received FDA approval in May 2002 for invasive aspergillosis, candidiasis, and other severe fungal infections[2][7]. The drug’s novel triazole structure offered broad-spectrum antifungal activity, particularly against Aspergillus and Candida krusei, which were increasingly resistant to older therapies[7]. Pfizer commercialized VFEND® in three formulations: tablets (50 mg and 200 mg), intravenous injections, and oral suspensions, securing patents that initially prevented generic competition[2][3].

Patent Expiry and Strategic Settlements

Pfizer’s patent exclusivity for VFEND® tablets expired in the early 2010s, prompting generic manufacturers to file Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) with Paragraph IV certifications challenging remaining patents[3][4]. In 2009, Pfizer settled litigation with Mylan, granting them a license to launch voriconazole tablets in 2011 while retaining exclusivity for intravenous and oral suspension forms[3][4]. This agreement allowed Mylan to become the first generic supplier, leveraging 180 days of market exclusivity under the Hatch-Waxman Act[4]. Subsequent settlements with other manufacturers, such as Lupin and Ajanta Pharma, expanded generic access post-2016[2][8].


Generic Voriconazole Suppliers and Market Dynamics

First-to-File Manufacturers and Exclusivity Periods

Mylan’s 2011 launch of voriconazole tablets marked the beginning of generic competition, capturing a significant share of VFEND®’s $186 million annual sales at the time[4]. The company’s early entry was facilitated by its Paragraph IV certification and strategic licensing agreement with Pfizer[3][4]. By 2016, additional manufacturers, including Lupin, Aurobindo Pharma, and Sun Pharmaceuticals, received FDA approval for tablets and oral suspensions, further diversifying the market[2][8]. For example, Lupin’s 2023 launch included both tablet and oral suspension forms, achieving AB ratings for bioequivalence to Pfizer’s reference products[8].

Regional Manufacturing Hubs: India and China

India emerged as a hub for generic voriconazole production, with companies like Dr. Reddy’s, Cipla, and Hetero Labs supplying APIs and finished dosages globally[5][6][9]. Chinese manufacturers, such as Zhejiang Poly Pharm and Hunan Huateng Pharmaceutical, also gained FDA approval for APIs, underscoring their role in cost-effective production[2][6]. This geographic shift reduced voriconazole prices by over 70% in some markets, improving accessibility in low-income regions[10].


Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Suppliers

Key API Manufacturers and Certifications

The voriconazole API supply chain is dominated by Indian firms, including:

  1. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories: Supplies USP-compliant APIs with DMF filings[6][11].
  2. Hetero Labs: Produces GMP-certified voriconazole for global generics[5][9].
  3. Sun Pharma: Offers APIs for oral and intravenous formulations[6][9].
    Chinese suppliers like Zhejiang Hisoar Pharmaceutical and Hunan Huateng have also secured FDA approvals, highlighting their increasing compliance with international quality standards[6][9].

Quality and Regulatory Compliance

API suppliers must adhere to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and file Drug Master Files (DMFs) with the FDA. For instance, LGM Pharma (U.S.) and Medichem S.A. (Spain) provide voriconazole APIs with EUR Pharmacopoeia certifications, catering to European and U.S. markets[5][9]. However, disparities in regional regulations have led to concerns about substandard APIs from unverified suppliers, particularly in online marketplaces[2][10].


Regulatory and Market Challenges

Bioequivalence and Therapeutic Equivalence

Generic voriconazole products must demonstrate bioequivalence to VFEND®’s reference listed drug (RLD) to receive AB ratings[2][8]. For example, Lupin’s tablets and oral suspension met stringent dissolution and pharmacokinetic criteria, ensuring interchangeability with Pfizer’s brand[8]. Injectable generics, classified as AP-rated due to formulation complexities, require stricter adherence to sterile manufacturing protocols[2].

Counterfeit Products and Supply Chain Risks

The FDA has warned against counterfeit voriconazole tablets and APIs sold through illicit online pharmacies[2][10]. These products often lack active ingredients or contain harmful contaminants, posing significant patient risks. In 2024, Indian authorities shut down a facility in Surat for distributing falsified voriconazole labeled as “Pfizer VFEND®”[10].


Conclusion

The voriconazole supply chain reflects broader trends in pharmaceutical globalization, with India and China driving generic production while facing quality control challenges. Pfizer’s strategic patent settlements allowed controlled generic entry, balancing innovation incentives with affordability. Moving forward, strengthening regulatory oversight and supplier verification mechanisms will be critical to ensuring patient safety in an increasingly fragmented market.


Key Takeaways

  1. Pfizer’s VFEND® dominated the antifungal market until patent expirations enabled generic competition.
  2. Mylan and Lupin are key generic suppliers, leveraging FDA exclusivity periods and bioequivalence data.
  3. Indian and Chinese API manufacturers form the backbone of global voriconazole production.
  4. Counterfeit products remain a risk, necessitating rigorous supply chain audits.

FAQs

1. How does bioequivalence affect generic voriconazole quality?
Generics must match the reference drug’s pharmacokinetic profile to receive AB ratings, ensuring therapeutic equivalence[2][8].

2. Why are most voriconazole APIs manufactured in India?
India offers cost advantages, skilled labor, and FDA-compliant facilities, making it a global hub for API production[5][6].

3. What risks are associated with online pharmacies selling voriconazole?
Unverified sources may distribute counterfeit or substandard products lacking active ingredients[2][10].

4. How did Pfizer manage generic competition after patent expiry?
Through strategic settlements, such as the 2009 agreement with Mylan, which delayed generic entry for non-tablet forms[3][4].

5. What role do DMF filings play in API supply?
DMFs provide FDA with detailed manufacturing data, ensuring API quality and compliance[6][9].

“The rapid entry of generic voriconazole post-2011 transformed market dynamics, reducing costs while raising vigilance for quality standards.” – FDA Drug Safety Communication, 2025[2].

References

  1. https://mms.mckesson.com/product/631287/Pfizer-Pharmaceuticals-Brand-00049318030
  2. https://www.drugs.com/availability/generic-vfend.html
  3. https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer_announces_settlement_and_license_agreement_with_mylan_related_to_vfend
  4. https://investor.mylan.com/static-files/30fac70d-3014-486c-a4cf-40acef34407e
  5. https://pharmaoffer.com/api-excipient-supplier/antimycotics/voriconazole
  6. https://www.pharmacompass.com/manufacturers-suppliers-exporters/vfend-voriconazole
  7. https://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=13932
  8. https://www.lupin.com/lupin-launches-generic-vfend-tablets-and-vfend-oral-suspension-in-the-us/
  9. https://pharmaoffer.com/api-excipient-supplier/antimycotics/vfend
  10. https://dir.indiamart.com/impcat/vfend.html
  11. https://pharmaoffer.com/api-excipient-supplier/antimycotics/voriconazole/dmf

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.