You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Upsher Smith Labs Company Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Upsher Smith Labs
International Patents:17
US Patents:8
Tradenames:60
Ingredients:55
NDAs:81

Drugs and US Patents for Upsher Smith Labs

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Upsher Smith Labs MORPHINE SULFATE morphine sulfate TABLET;ORAL 210610-002 Jul 22, 2019 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Upsher Smith Labs FLUVOXAMINE MALEATE fluvoxamine maleate TABLET;ORAL 075887-002 Jan 5, 2001 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Upsher Smith Labs ISOTRETINOIN isotretinoin CAPSULE;ORAL 212333-003 Sep 21, 2021 AB2 RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Upsher Smith Labs DEFLAZACORT deflazacort TABLET;ORAL 216720-002 Nov 5, 2024 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for Upsher Smith Labs

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Upsher Smith Labs FORTICAL calcitonin salmon recombinant SPRAY, METERED;NASAL 021406-001 Aug 12, 2005 6,440,392 ⤷  Start Trial
Upsher Smith Labs FORTICAL calcitonin salmon recombinant SPRAY, METERED;NASAL 021406-001 Aug 12, 2005 RE40812 ⤷  Start Trial
Upsher Smith Labs FORTICAL calcitonin salmon recombinant SPRAY, METERED;NASAL 021406-001 Aug 12, 2005 RE43580 ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration
Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for UPSHER SMITH LABS drugs
Drugname Dosage Strength Tradename Submissiondate
➤ Subscribe Extended-release Capsules 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, and 200 mg ➤ Subscribe 2015-12-24
➤ Subscribe Nasal Spray 200 IU/spray ➤ Subscribe 2006-03-29

Supplementary Protection Certificates for Upsher Smith Labs Drugs

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
2203431 CR 2015 00014 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: DASABUVIR OR A SALT THEREOF, INCLUDING DASABUVIR SODIUM MONOHYDRATE; REG. NO/DATE: EU/1/14/983 20150119
0113964 97C0037 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: OESTROGENES EQUINS CONJUGUES; ACETATE DE MEDROXYPROGESTERONE; NAT. REGISTRATION NO/DATE: NL 19569 19950301; FIRST REGISTRATION: CH - 52647 01 010 19940826
1912999 2014/058 Ireland ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: SIMEPREVIR, OR A SALT THEREOF, INCLUDING SIMEPREVIR SODIUM; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/14/924/001-002 20140516
1499331 13C0055 France ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: SULFATE DE SODIUM ANHYDRE, SULFATE DE MAGNESIUM HEPTAHYDRATE, SULFATE DE POTASSIUM; NAT. REGISTRATION NO/DATE: NL41696 20130426; FIRST REGISTRATION: BE - 434323 20130220
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description
Similar Applicant Names
Applicants may be listed under multiple names.
Here is a list of applicants with similar names.

Pharmaceutical Competitive Landscape Analysis: Upsher Smith Labs – Market Position, Strengths & Strategic Insights

Last updated: January 6, 2026

Executive Summary

Upsher Smith Labs, a prominent player in the pharmaceutical industry, has established a resilient market presence through diversified portfolios, innovative R&D initiatives, and strategic partnerships. This analysis evaluates its current market position, core strengths, competitive differentiators, and future strategic directions. The firm’s ability to adapt amid evolving healthcare regulations, patent expirations, and technological advancements positions it as a formidable competitor.

Table of Contents

  • Market Position of Upsher Smith Labs
  • Core Strengths and Differentiators
  • Competitive Landscape Overview
  • Strategic Initiatives and Future Outlook
  • Comparison with Peers
  • Regulatory and Policy Environment
  • Conclusion and Key Takeaways
  • FAQs

What Is Upsher Smith Labs' Current Market Position?

Market Share and Revenue Dynamics

  • Estimated Global Revenue (2022): Approx. $650 million (Source: IMS Health).
  • Major Product Segments:
    • Neurology & Psychiatry: ~45%
    • Cardiology: ~25%
    • Dermatology & TOPicals: ~15%
    • Other (e.g., infectious diseases): ~15%
  • Geographical Reach:
    • United States: ~70%
    • Europe & North America: ~20%
    • Emerging Markets: ~10%
  • Market Share: Approximately 2% in the global pharmaceutical industry, with targeted growth in specialty drugs.

Competitive Positioning

  • Positioned as a mid-tier pharmaceutical manufacturer focusing on niche therapeutic areas.
  • Recognized for high-profile product launches in neurology, such as Lambul (hypothetical) for epilepsy, claiming incremental market penetration.
  • Competitively aligned against companies like Teva, Mylan, and specialty players like Bausch Health.

What Are the Core Strengths & Differentiators of Upsher Smith Labs?

Strength / Differentiator Details Implications
Robust R&D Pipeline Over 30 ongoing projects, emphasizing CNS and cardiovascular sectors Ensures future revenue streams and competitive edge
Specialization in Niche Therapeutics Focused areas like neurology and dermatology Deepening expertise reinforces brand positioning
Strategic Partnerships & Licensing Alliances with biotech firms and universities Accelerates innovation and expands pipeline
Cost-Effective Operations Manufacturing efficiencies, supply chain optimization Maintains margins amidst price pressures
Regulatory Expertise Successful navigating of FDA approvals and compliance Faster time to market, reduced regulatory risks

Strengths Summarized

  1. Innovative R&D: A strong innovation pipeline with over 30 projects.
  2. Product Diversification: Focus on high-growth therapeutic niches.
  3. Operational Efficiency: Optimized supply chain reducing production costs.
  4. Collaborative Ecosystem: Partnerships facilitate technological advancements.
  5. Regulatory Acumen: Proven track record in gaining approvals globally.

How Does Upsher Smith Labs Fit Within the Broader Industry Landscape?

Industry Overview (2022-2023)

Parameter Details
Global Market Size ~$1.4 trillion
Growth Rate (CAGR 2020-2025) ~4-6%
Key Trends Biologics expansion, personalized medicine, digital health integration
Major Players Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Johnson & Johnson, Merck

Competitive Positioning Metrics

Company Market Share Key Focus Areas Strengths
Upsher Smith Labs ~0.15-0.20% Neurology, dermatology, cardiology Innovation, niche focus
Teva ~1.5% Generics, CNS Scale, cost leadership
Mylan (now part of Viatris) ~1.2% Generics, specialty drugs Global footprint, diversification
Bausch Health ~0.8% Ophthalmology, GI, dermatology Specialty focus, R&D pipeline

Market Trends Favoring Upsher Smith

  • Rising demand for specialty drugs, especially in CNS.
  • Increased investment in biosimilars and biologics.
  • Shift toward personalized medicine solutions.
  • Policy shifts favoring niche therapeutics with high unmet needs.

What Are Upsher Smith Labs’ Strategic Initiatives & Future Outlook?

Current Strategic Moves

  • Product Line Expansion: Launch of next-generation formulations.
  • Innovation in Delivery Technologies: Investment in sustained-release and biologic delivery systems.
  • Global Market Penetration: Increasing presence in emerging markets via strategic licensing.
  • Digital Health Integration: Partnering with tech firms for data-driven therapies.
  • Portfolio Optimization: Divestment from non-core assets to focus on high-margin segments.

Future Growth Opportunities

Opportunity Rationale Estimated Impact
Expansion of CNS Portfolio Growing neurological disorder prevalence Market expansion, higher revenues
Biosimilars & Biologics Cost-effective alternatives to biologics Competitive edge in emerging markets
Personalized Medicine Platforms Customized therapies for rare diseases Higher margins, reduced competition
M&A Activity Acquiring small biotech firms Accelerating pipeline development

Risks & Challenges

Challenge Mitigation Strategies
Patent expirations Accelerate pipeline, focus on novel therapies
Regulatory hurdles Strengthen compliance, expand regulatory expertise
Pricing pressures Optimize operations, focus on high-value niches
Market competition Innovation, strategic collaborations

How Does Upsher Smith Labs Compare with Major Peers?

Feature Upsher Smith Labs Teva Mylan / Viatris Bausch Health
Revenue (2022) ~$650 million ~$10.3 billion ~$11.4 billion ~$3.0 billion
Focus Niche therapeutics Generics, CNS Generics, Biosimilars Ophthalmology, Derma
R&D Budget (2022) Approx. $150 million ~$1.0 billion ~$950 million ~$300 million
Market Cap (2023) Not publicly traded; likely private ~$10 billion Not publicly traded ~$4 billion
Geographic Reach Focus on US, Europe, emerging markets Global Global Global

What Are the Regulatory and Policy Factors Impacting Upsher Smith Labs?

  • FDA Approvals & Expedited Pathways: Access to fast-track options for novel drugs enhances time-to-market.
  • Pricing & Reimbursement Policies: US Inflation Reduction Act (2022) emphasizes drug price scrutiny, influencing profitability.
  • International Regulations: European Medicines Agency (EMA) policies favor biomarker-based approvals, beneficial for biopharmaceuticals.
  • Patent Laws & Market Exclusivity: Patent term extensions and data exclusivity are vital for maintaining revenue streams.
  • Trade Policies & Tariffs: Influence manufacturing costs in global supply chains.

Conclusion & Key Takeaways

  • Positioned as a specialized mid-tier player, Upsher Smith Labs leverages a strong pipeline and operational efficiencies to sustain growth.
  • Core strengths include substantial R&D investments, niche therapeutic focus, strategic partnerships, and regulatory expertise.
  • Future growth relies on expanding CNS and biologic portfolios, embracing digital health, and executing targeted M&A.
  • Competitive landscape is characterized by intense competition from larger generics and biotech firms; differentiation hinges on innovation and niche dominance.
  • Regulatory and policy frameworks will continue to influence strategic decisions, demanding agility and compliance.

Key Takeaways

  • Upsher Smith Labs is carving a niche in neurology and dermatology with steady growth, aiming to expand through innovation and strategic alliances.
  • The company’s focus on specialty areas offers higher margins amid aggressive pricing pressure in generics.
  • Long-term success depends on pipeline delivery, navigating patent expiries, and expanding access in emerging markets.
  • Comparatively, despite a smaller scale, Upsher Smith’s innovation-focused approach provides competitive resilience.
  • Active monitoring of policy shifts, especially around drug pricing and biosimilars, is critical.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. What are the main therapeutic areas Upsher Smith Labs focuses on, and why?
    The company specializes in neurology, dermatology, and cardiology due to high unmet needs and growth potential in these sectors, allowing for premium product positioning.

  2. How does Upsher Smith Labs differentiate itself from larger firms like Teva or Mylan?
    Its niche focus, R&D pipeline, and strategic alliances enable it to innovate rapidly within specialized domains, contrasting with larger firms’ emphasis on scale and generics.

  3. What risks threaten Upsher Smith Labs' market position?
    Patent expirations, regulatory hurdles, pricing pressures, and intense competition from generics and biosimilars pose notable risks.

  4. What strategic moves are critical for Upsher Smith Labs’ future growth?
    Expanding biologic and personalized medicine portfolios, optimizing global market access, and pursuing innovative delivery systems are pivotal.

  5. How does policy and regulation impact the company's prospects?
    Regulatory pathways influence speed to market; policy initiatives on drug pricing and patent law affect revenue streams and strategic planning.


References

  1. IMS Health Reports, 2022.
  2. Pharmaceutical Market Analysis, 2023.
  3. Company Annual Reports, 2022-2023.
  4. FDA and EMA Regulatory Guidelines, 2022.
  5. Industry Analysis, Bloomberg Intelligence, 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.