You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Patent: 10,047,116


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,047,116
Title:Nanoparticles, process for preparation and use thereof as carrier for amphipatic and hydrophobic molecules in fields of medicine including cancer treatment and food related compounds
Abstract: The present invention regards nanoparticles comprising a sterol and a component derived from Quillaja saponaria Molina selected from quillaja acid and quillaja saponin, which nanoparticles do not comprise a phospholipid. It also relates to a composition comprising the nanoparticles, and the use thereof as adjuvant, especially in vaccines, as carriers for amphipathic or hydrophobic molecules and as agents for treatment of cancer. Further, it regards a method for producing the phospholipid-free nanoparticles, a method for the treatment of cancer and a method for assessing the applicability of the cancer treating method.
Inventor(s): Morein; Bror (Uppsala, SE), Berenjian; Saideh (Uppsala, SE), Hu; Kafei (Uppsala, SE)
Assignee: MX Adjuvac AB (Enkoping, SE)
Application Number:14/349,142
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of U.S. Patents: A Detailed Analysis

Introduction

Patents are a cornerstone of innovation, providing inventors and companies with the exclusive rights to their inventions. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) plays a crucial role in granting these patents, ensuring that the inventions meet specific criteria. This article will delve into the scope and claims of U.S. patents, using the example of U.S. Patent 10,047,116, and provide a comprehensive analysis of the patent landscape.

The Role of the USPTO

The USPTO is the agency responsible for granting U.S. patents and registering trademarks. It ensures that patents are awarded to inventions that are novel, non-obvious, and useful, adhering to the standards set by U.S. patent law[2].

Patent Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for a patent, an invention must meet the criteria outlined in 35 U.S.C. ยง 101, which includes being a process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any improvement thereof. The USPTO's recent guidance updates, such as those in 2024, have refined these criteria, especially for AI-related inventions. The focus is on whether a claim integrates a judicial exception into a practical application, ensuring that the claimed invention offers a concrete technological improvement[1].

Patent Claims and Scope

Patent claims define the scope of the invention and are crucial in determining the patent's validity and enforceability. The scope of a patent can be measured using metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count. Narrower claims are often associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process[3].

Independent Claim Length and Count

Research has shown that the length and count of independent claims can be indicative of the patent's scope. Longer and more numerous independent claims can suggest broader patents, which may face more scrutiny during the examination process. Conversely, narrower claims are generally more likely to be granted quickly[3].

Example: U.S. Patent 10,047,116

While the specific details of U.S. Patent 10,047,116 are not provided here, we can use general principles to understand its scope and claims.

Claim Structure

A typical patent includes multiple claims, each describing a different aspect of the invention. These claims are categorized into independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims.

Claim Analysis

To analyze the claims of U.S. Patent 10,047,116, one would need to examine each claim carefully. Here are some steps:

Identify Independent Claims

Independent claims are the foundation of the patent and define the broadest scope of the invention.

Evaluate Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow down the scope by adding additional limitations to the independent claims.

Assess Claim Language

The language used in the claims is critical. Clear and specific language helps in defining the invention precisely and avoids ambiguity.

Recent USPTO Guidance on AI Patents

The 2024 USPTO guidance update provides significant insights into how AI-related inventions are evaluated. Here are some key points:

AI-Assisted Inventions

The update clarifies that the method of invention development, including the use of AI, does not impact subject matter eligibility. Instead, the focus remains on the claimed invention itself, ensuring that AI-assisted inventions are evaluated on equal footing with other technologies[1].

Practical Application

The guidance emphasizes evaluating whether a claim integrates a judicial exception into a practical application. This involves assessing additional elements in the claim to determine if they impose meaningful limits on the exception, transforming the claim into patent-eligible subject matter[1].

New Examples

The USPTO has introduced new examples specifically tailored to AI technologies. For instance, Example 47 focuses on an artificial neural network designed to identify or detect anomalies, illustrating how claims involving specific applications of neural networks can meet the eligibility criteria by demonstrating an improvement in computer technology[1].

Industry Trends and Patent Activity

The patent landscape is influenced by various industry trends. For example:

Technology Areas

Patents granted by the USPTO are classified into various technological fields. In 2018, electrical and mechanical engineering patents made up about 60% of USPTO patents, with a significant increase in electrical engineering patents driven by information and communication technologies (ICT)[4].

R&D and Patenting

High R&D industries have high rates of patenting. Firms in the computer and electronics manufacturing industry received the greatest number of patents in 2017, reflecting their significant R&D investments[4].

Challenges and Future Directions

The patent system faces several challenges, including the need for clarity and consistency in patent eligibility criteria.

Small Claims Patent Court

There have been discussions and studies on the feasibility of a small claims patent court to address issues related to patent litigation costs and complexity. This could potentially streamline the process for smaller inventors and companies[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Eligibility: The USPTO's guidance updates refine the criteria for patent eligibility, especially for AI-related inventions, focusing on practical applications and meaningful limits.
  • Claim Structure: Independent and dependent claims define the scope of the invention, with narrower claims generally having a higher probability of grant.
  • Industry Trends: Patents are heavily influenced by industry trends, with high R&D industries showing high rates of patenting.
  • Future Directions: Initiatives like the small claims patent court aim to address challenges in the patent system.

FAQs

What is the role of the USPTO in granting patents?

The USPTO is responsible for granting U.S. patents and registering trademarks, ensuring that inventions meet the criteria of being novel, non-obvious, and useful.

How does the USPTO evaluate AI-related inventions?

The USPTO evaluates AI-related inventions based on whether the claimed invention integrates a judicial exception into a practical application, ensuring that AI-assisted inventions are treated equally with other technologies.

What metrics can be used to measure patent scope?

Metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count can be used to measure patent scope, indicating the breadth and clarity of the patent.

Which industries have the highest rates of patenting?

High R&D industries, particularly those in computer and electronics manufacturing, have the highest rates of patenting.

What is the purpose of a small claims patent court?

A small claims patent court aims to streamline the patent litigation process, making it more accessible and less costly for smaller inventors and companies.

Sources

  1. Understanding the 2024 USPTO Guidance Update on AI Patent: Mintz, July 25, 2024.
  2. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) | USAGov.
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope: SSRN, September 29, 2016.
  4. Invention: U.S. and Comparative Global Trends: NCSES, January 15, 2020.
  5. U.S. Patent Small Claims Court: ACUS.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Details for Patent 10,047,116

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.