You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: May 5, 2025

Patent: 10,975,127


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,975,127
Title:Flagellin-based agents and uses including effective vaccination
Abstract:The present invention relates to, in part, compositions comprising improved flagellin derived constructs and methods of using for vaccination, including adjuvants comprising flagellin-based agents.
Inventor(s):Andrei V. Gudkov, Vadim Mett, Vadim Krivokrysenko
Assignee:Genome Protection Inc
Application Number:US16/910,347
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analyzing the Claims and Patent Landscape of United States Patent 10,975,127

Introduction

Patent analysis is a crucial process for understanding the innovation landscape, competitive dynamics, and the strength of a patent. This article will provide a comprehensive and critical analysis of the claims and the patent landscape surrounding United States Patent 10,975,127, using various analytical tools and methodologies.

Understanding the Patent

To begin, it is essential to understand the specifics of the patent in question. United States Patent 10,975,127, like any other patent, includes several key components such as the abstract, claims, description, and drawings. Each of these components provides valuable insights into the invention, its novelty, and its non-obviousness.

Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Scope

The claims of a patent define the scope of the invention and are critical in determining the patent's enforceability and validity. For U.S. Patent 10,975,127, analyzing the claims involves identifying the independent and dependent claims, understanding the claim language, and assessing the breadth and specificity of the claims.

<blockquote>
"Most stakeholders GAO interviewed said they would define a quality patent as one that would meet the statutory requirements for novelty and clarity, among others, and would be upheld if challenged in a lawsuit or other proceeding."[1]
</blockquote>

Statutory Compliance

Ensuring that the claims comply with statutory requirements such as those outlined in 35 U.S.C. §§ 101, 102, 103, and 112 is vital. The USPTO has developed correctness measures and compliance targets to ensure that patents meet these requirements[1].

Prior Art Search

Conducting a thorough prior art search is essential to determine the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention. This involves identifying relevant prior art that could impact the patent's validity.

"Effective patent analysis can help patent examiners and applicants identify relevant prior art, which is crucial for the success of the patent application."[4]

Citation Analysis

Analyzing patent citations can provide insights into how the patent relates to prior and subsequent innovations. This can help gauge the importance and influence of the patent within its technological field.

Patent Family Analysis

Patent family analysis helps determine the geographical coverage of the patent and whether it has been filed in multiple countries. This is crucial for understanding the global reach and protection of the invention.

Technology Classification

Assigning appropriate technology classifications or codes to the patent categorizes it by technology area, making it easier to analyze and compare with other patents in the same field.

Competitive Landscape

Analyzing the competitive landscape involves identifying competitors and key players in the technology field. This includes assessing their patent portfolios to understand their strengths and weaknesses.

Patent Trends and Time Series Analysis

Plotting patent filing trends over time helps in understanding the evolution of technology in the field. Identifying peaks and valleys in innovation activity can provide insights into market trends and future directions.

Keyword Analysis

Using natural language processing (NLP) and text mining techniques to analyze patent titles and abstracts for common keywords and trends can reveal patterns and hotspots in innovation.

Visualizations

Creating visualizations such as heat maps, network graphs, and trend charts can present the findings in a visually compelling manner, making it easier to interpret and communicate the results.

Patent Valuation

Valuing a patent involves assessing its economic potential, legal strength, and market demand. This can be done through various methods, including cost-based, market-based, and income-based approaches.

The Role of PTAB and Inter Partes Review

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and inter partes review (IPR) processes play a significant role in challenging the validity of patents. These processes are often faster and less expensive than judicial proceedings and require a lower burden of proof to invalidate patents[3].

Impact of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA)

The AIA, enacted in 2011, significantly changed U.S. patent law by introducing new types of administrative challenges to patent validity. This has had a profound impact on how patents are challenged and defended, particularly through PTAB and IPR processes[3].

Case Law and Patentable Subject Matter

The Supreme Court's decisions, such as the Alice/Mayo framework, have established a two-step test for determining patentable subject matter. This framework is crucial in assessing whether a patent claims ineligible subject matter and whether it contains an inventive concept[3].

Technology Innovation and Patent Applications

The increasing number of patent applications, driven by technological innovation, poses challenges in managing and analyzing patent data. Automated systems and methods, such as those described in US20110138338A1, are being developed to reduce the complexity of patent analysis[2].

Conclusion

Analyzing the claims and patent landscape of United States Patent 10,975,127 involves a multifaceted approach that includes claims analysis, prior art search, citation analysis, and competitive landscape assessment. Understanding the statutory compliance, technology classification, and the role of PTAB and IPR processes is also crucial. By leveraging these tools and methodologies, businesses can gain valuable insights into the innovation landscape and make informed decisions about their intellectual property strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: Ensure claims meet statutory requirements and are clear and specific.
  • Prior Art Search: Conduct thorough searches to determine novelty and non-obviousness.
  • Citation Analysis: Analyze citations to gauge the patent's influence and importance.
  • Competitive Landscape: Identify competitors and assess their patent portfolios.
  • PTAB and IPR: Understand the role of these processes in challenging patent validity.
  • Technology Trends: Analyze patent filing trends to understand market directions.
  • Patent Valuation: Assess the economic potential and legal strength of the patent.

FAQs

Q1: What is the importance of claims analysis in patent evaluation? Claims analysis is crucial as it defines the scope of the invention and determines the patent's enforceability and validity.

Q2: How does the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) impact patent challenges? The AIA introduced new administrative challenges to patent validity through PTAB and IPR processes, making it faster and less expensive to challenge patents compared to judicial proceedings.

Q3: What is the role of prior art search in the patent application process? Prior art search is essential to determine whether an invention is novel and non-obvious, which is crucial for the success of the patent application.

Q4: How can citation analysis help in understanding a patent's significance? Citation analysis helps gauge the importance of a patent by showing how it relates to prior and subsequent innovations.

Q5: Why is technology classification important in patent analysis? Technology classification helps categorize patents by technology area, making it easier to analyze and compare them within the same field.

Sources

  1. GAO Report: Intellectual Property: Patent Office Should Define Quality, Reassess Incentives, and Improve Workforce Planning. (June 30, 2016)
  2. Google Patents: US20110138338A1 - Patent Claims Analysis System and Method.
  3. Congressional Research Service: The Patent Trial and Appeal Board and Inter Partes Review. (Updated May 28, 2024)
  4. Evalueserve: Patent Analysis.
  5. Department of Energy: hfto-2021-patent-analysis.pdf. (2023)

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Details for Patent 10,975,127

ApplicantTradenameBiologic IngredientDosage FormBLAApproval DatePatent No.Expiredate
Bavarian Nordic A/s RABAVERT rabies vaccine For Injection 103334 October 20, 1997 ⤷  Try for Free 2034-07-30
Sanofi Pasteur Sa IMOVAX RABIES rabies vaccine For Injection 103931 February 04, 2000 ⤷  Try for Free 2034-07-30
>Applicant>Tradename>Biologic Ingredient>Dosage Form>BLA>Approval Date>Patent No.>Expiredate
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.