You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 26, 2024

Patent: 4,057,617


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,057,617
Title: Method of labeling proteins with technetium
Abstract:Fibrinogen is labeled with .sup.99m Technetium by reducing pertechnetate at a pH of about 11-12 using a solution of stannous chloride in the presence of a base, then contacting the reduced pertechnetate with fibrinogen. Unwanted lower molecular weight impurities are removed; the labeled product suitably adjusted to a pH of 7-8 to form an injectable isotopic tracer solution.
Inventor(s): Abramovici; Jean (Ixelles, 1050 Brussels, BE), Ermans; Andre Marie (Ixelles, 1050 Brussels, BE), Jeghers; Omer (4561 Neufchateau, BE)
Application Number:05/635,774
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analyzing the Patent Landscape: A Comprehensive Look at United States Patent 4,057,617

Introduction

When delving into the world of patents, understanding the landscape and the specific claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will provide a detailed analysis of the claims and the broader patent landscape surrounding United States Patent 4,057,617, although the specific patent details are not provided in the sources. We will, however, use general principles and recent patent trends to guide our discussion.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of any patent application, defining the scope of protection sought by the inventor. These claims must be clear, concise, and supported by the patent's description and drawings[5].

Types of Claims

  • Independent Claims: These stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These refer back to an independent claim and further limit the scope of the invention.
  • Method Claims: Describe the steps involved in a process.
  • Apparatus Claims: Describe the physical components of an invention.

The Importance of Patent Landscape Analysis

Analyzing the patent landscape involves identifying existing patents that may impact the validity or enforceability of a new patent. This includes understanding third-party patents, freedom to operate (FTO) analyses, and potential infringement risks[5].

Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analyses

FTO analyses are comprehensive reviews to ensure that a new invention does not infringe on existing patents. This is critical for commercializing an invention without legal hurdles.

Patent Landscape Searching

This is a focused review to identify key patents in the relevant field. It helps in understanding the competitive landscape and potential barriers to commercialization.

Recent Trends in U.S. Patent Statistics

To contextualize our analysis, let's look at recent trends in U.S. patent statistics.

USPTO Patent Grants and Applications

In 2023, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) granted 348,399 patents, with 313,219 being utility patents and 35,180 being design patents. This reflects a strong innovation climate in the United States[3].

Technological Sectors

Key technological sectors such as Electric Digital Data Processing (G06F), Transmission of Digital Information (H04L), and Wireless Communication Networks (H04W) saw significant patent activity. These sectors are indicative of the rapid advancements in digital technologies and telecommunications[3].

Evaluating Third-Party Patents

When evaluating third-party patents, it is essential to consider the overall construct of the invention as well as each individual component. This layered approach helps in identifying potential blocking patents and mitigating risks.

Example: ADC Patents

In the field of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs), for instance, patent protection can be complex and layered. Each component of the ADC, including the ADC product itself, individual components, manufacturing methods, and methods of use, can form the subject of a granted patent. Understanding these complexities is vital for navigating the patent landscape effectively[5].

Challenges and Disputes

Patent validity can be challenged through various legal proceedings such as nullity actions, oppositions, post-grant review, or revocation proceedings. A notable example is the dispute between Seagen and Daiichi Sankyo, where the validity of a patent was challenged and ultimately found invalid by the United States Patent Trial and Appeal Board[5].

Strategic Implications

Understanding the patent landscape and conducting thorough FTO analyses can help in making informed decisions about research and development, resource allocation, and investment. This strategic approach can maximize the potential for commercial success while minimizing legal risks.

Case Study: Hypothetical Analysis of US Patent 4,057,617

While the specific details of US Patent 4,057,617 are not available, here is a hypothetical analysis based on general principles:

Claim Analysis

  • Independent Claims: Identify the core invention and its unique features.
  • Dependent Claims: Analyze how these further limit the scope of the invention.
  • Method and Apparatus Claims: Understand the processes and physical components described.

Patent Landscape

  • Conduct a thorough search to identify relevant third-party patents.
  • Perform FTO analyses to ensure the invention does not infringe on existing patents.
  • Evaluate the competitive landscape and potential barriers to commercialization.

Technological Context

  • Place the patent within the broader technological sector it belongs to.
  • Analyze recent trends and statistics in that sector to understand its significance and potential impact.

Key Takeaways

  • Clear Claims: Ensure patent claims are clear, concise, and well-supported.
  • Comprehensive Analysis: Conduct thorough FTO analyses and patent landscape searches.
  • Strategic Decision-Making: Use the insights from patent landscape analysis to direct research, resources, and investment.
  • Legal Vigilance: Be prepared to defend or challenge patent validity through legal proceedings if necessary.

FAQs

Q: What is the importance of patent claims in a patent application? A: Patent claims define the scope of protection sought by the inventor and must be clear, concise, and supported by the patent's description and drawings.

Q: How does Freedom to Operate (FTO) analysis differ from patent landscape searching? A: FTO analysis is a comprehensive review to ensure the invention does not infringe on existing patents, while patent landscape searching is a focused review to identify key patents in the relevant field.

Q: What are some common challenges to patent validity? A: Patent validity can be challenged through nullity actions, oppositions, post-grant review, or revocation proceedings.

Q: Why is it important to evaluate third-party patents? A: Evaluating third-party patents helps in identifying potential blocking patents, mitigating risks, and making informed decisions about research and development.

Q: How can understanding the patent landscape impact commercial success? A: Understanding the patent landscape can help in navigating legal risks, directing resources effectively, and maximizing the potential for commercial success.

Sources

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Statistics 2023 - TT Consultants.
  2. Traversing a Dynamic ADC Patent Landscape - FB Rice.
  3. USPTO Patent Statistics Report 2023 - TT Consultants.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Details for Patent 4,057,617

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Csl Behring Gmbh RIASTAP fibrinogen concentrate (human) For Injection 125317 January 16, 2009 4,057,617 1995-05-15
Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsges.m.b.h. FIBRYGA fibrinogen (human) For Injection 125612 June 07, 2017 4,057,617 1995-05-15
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.