You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2024

Patent: 5,370,629


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,370,629
Title: Injection device
Abstract:The invention concerns an injection device (1) receiving in exchangeable manner an ampoule (4) with a plunger (5) and an injection needle (6). It further comprises an actuation means (7) essentially consisting of an operating head (8), a drive element (11), a guide element (24) and an output member (9, 19) preferably in the form of a rod (9) and flange (19). The output member is non-rotatably affixed to the guide element (11) itself rigidly mounted inside the device (1) and seated by its own thread in an internal thread (27) of the drive element (11) which can be displaced axially and into rotation by the manual operating head (8). When rotating the operating head (8), the output member (9, 19) is advanced and in the process forces forward the plunger (5), the result being injection. The stationary guide element (24) of the disclosed device is located axially ahead of the axially displaceable drive element (11). Accordingly the length of the actuation system (7) is shorter than in state-of-the-art injection devices, whereby a larger maximum dose can be injected with a device (1) of the same length. The device (1) is applicable in medicine.
Inventor(s): Michel; Peter (Burgdorf, CH), Kirchhofer; Fritz (Sumiswald, CH)
Assignee: Medimpex Ets. (Balzers, LI)
Application Number:08/133,108
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analyzing the Claims and Patent Landscape of United States Patent 5,370,629

Introduction

United States Patent 5,370,629, issued in 1994, is a patent that has been part of the intellectual property landscape for nearly three decades. To conduct a comprehensive and critical analysis of its claims and the surrounding patent landscape, we need to delve into several key areas, including the patent's content, the tools and methods for patent searching, the role of AI in patent applications, and the broader context of patent validity and enforcement.

Understanding the Patent

To begin, it is crucial to understand the specifics of the patent in question. This involves reviewing the patent's abstract, claims, and detailed description to grasp the invention's scope and novelty.

  • Abstract and Claims: The abstract provides a brief overview of the invention, while the claims define the legal boundaries of the patent. Analyzing these sections helps in identifying what is protected and what is not.
  • Detailed Description: This section explains the invention in detail, including drawings and examples. It is essential for understanding the context and implementation of the invention.

Tools and Methods for Patent Searching

When analyzing the patent landscape, several tools and resources are available to help identify prior art, related patents, and potential infringements.

Patent Public Search

The USPTO's Patent Public Search tool is a powerful resource for searching prior art. It replaces legacy tools like PubEast and PubWest, offering enhanced access to prior art with modern interfaces[1].

Global Dossier

The Global Dossier service provides access to file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, including the IP5 Offices. This helps in identifying the patent family and related applications, along with citation data and office actions[1].

Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs)

Local PTRCs offer training in patent search techniques and maintain local search resources, which can be invaluable for a thorough analysis[1].

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The CCD application consolidates citation data from participating IP Offices, allowing users to visualize search results for the same invention on a single page[1].

Role of AI in Patent Applications

AI tools are increasingly used in patent applications, but their use must be carefully managed.

  • Disclosure Requirements: If AI tools are material to patentability, their use must be disclosed to the USPTO. This includes any contributions made by AI to the drafting of the patent application or the introduction of alternative embodiments not conceived by the inventor[2].
  • Accuracy and Verification: Practitioners must verify the accuracy of factual assertions and ensure that AI-generated documents do not introduce inaccurate statements or omit material information[2].

Patent Validity and Freedom to Operate Searches

To assess the strength of a patent like 5,370,629, several types of searches are necessary.

Patentability Search

A thorough search of global patent publications and non-patent literature helps identify references that disclose the same or similar inventions. This determines if the claims should be revised and informs decisions on whether to proceed with a patent filing[3].

Freedom to Operate Search

This search assesses whether there are any active or pending patents that could prevent the making, selling, or importing of a product or process in jurisdictions of interest. It helps in evaluating infringement risk and making informed decisions about design changes and licensing[3].

State of the Art Search

Understanding the current state of innovation in the relevant technology sector is crucial. A state of the art search provides a summary of prior art and scientific literature, helping to gauge the pace of innovation and the patent's position within it[3].

Patent Monitoring and Watch

Monitoring competitors' patent filings and tracking changes in the patent landscape can provide strategic insights. This includes receiving alerts when new patent applications are filed, when patents receive new citations, or when they lapse or are included in litigation[3].

Critical Analysis of the Patent Landscape

Prior Art and Citation Analysis

Using tools like the Common Citation Document (CCD) and the Patent Public Search, one can analyze the prior art cited by various IP Offices. This helps in understanding the patent's novelty and non-obviousness in the context of existing inventions.

Competitor Analysis

Identifying competitors' patents and monitoring their filings can reveal market trends and potential threats or opportunities. This involves using resources like the Global Dossier and patent monitoring services[1][3].

Legal and Regulatory Context

The legal and regulatory environment, including updates from the USPTO and other IP Offices, can significantly impact the validity and enforceability of a patent. For example, recent guidance on patent subject matter eligibility and the use of AI tools must be considered[2][4].

Case Studies and Industry Expert Insights

  • Industry Expert Opinions: Experts in the field can provide valuable insights into the patent's significance and its position within the industry. For instance, they might highlight how the patent has influenced subsequent innovations or how it aligns with current market needs.
  • Litigation and Enforcement: Reviewing any litigation or enforcement actions related to the patent can offer practical insights into its validity and the challenges it may face.

Key Takeaways

  • Thorough Search: Conducting a thorough search using various tools and resources is essential for understanding the patent landscape.
  • AI Use: The use of AI tools in patent applications must be carefully managed to ensure compliance with USPTO guidelines.
  • Monitoring: Continuous monitoring of the patent landscape is crucial for maintaining a competitive edge and ensuring the patent's validity.
  • Legal Compliance: Staying updated with legal and regulatory changes is vital for the effective management and enforcement of patents.

FAQs

Q: What tools are available for searching prior art related to a patent? A: Tools such as the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and Common Citation Document (CCD) are available for searching prior art[1].

Q: How does AI impact the patent application process? A: AI can assist in drafting patent applications, but its use must be disclosed to the USPTO if it is material to patentability. Practitioners must verify the accuracy of AI-generated documents[2].

Q: What is the purpose of a Freedom to Operate Search? A: A Freedom to Operate Search assesses whether there are any active or pending patents that could prevent the making, selling, or importing of a product or process in jurisdictions of interest[3].

Q: How can one monitor competitors' patent filings? A: Using patent monitoring services, one can track competitors' filings from application to grant and receive alerts for new citations, lapses, or litigation involvement[3].

Q: What recent guidance has the USPTO issued regarding patent subject matter eligibility? A: The USPTO has issued updates on evaluating the subject matter eligibility of claims in patent applications and patents, aimed at assisting USPTO personnel and stakeholders[4].

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents
  2. BIPC - U.S. Patent Office Issues Additional Guidance on Use of AI Tools
  3. Clarivate - Patent Search Services
  4. Federal Register - 2024 Guidance Update on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Details for Patent 5,370,629

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Sanofi-aventis U.s. Llc LANTUS insulin glargine Injection 021081 April 20, 2000 5,370,629 2012-02-21
Sanofi-aventis U.s. Llc LANTUS insulin glargine Injection 021081 April 25, 2007 5,370,629 2012-02-21
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.