You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 23, 2024

Patent: 5,840,299


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,840,299
Title: Humanized antibodies against leukocyte adhesion molecule VLA-4
Abstract:The invention provides humanized immunoglobulins that specifically bind to the VLA-4 ligand, and methods of treatment using the same. The methods are particularly useful for treatment of multiple sclerosis.
Inventor(s): Bendig; Mary M. (London, GB), Leger; Olivier J. (Hertfordshire, GB), Saldanha; Jose (Enfield Middlesex, GB), Jones; S. Tarran (Radlett, GB), Yednock; Ted A. (Fairfax, CA)
Assignee: Athena Neurosciences, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA)
Application Number:08/561,521
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Comprehensive Analysis of United States Patent 5,840,299 and the Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 5,840,299, issued on November 24, 1998, is a significant patent that has contributed to the development of various technologies. To understand its impact and the broader patent landscape, this analysis will delve into the patent's claims, its historical context, and the current state of the relevant technological field.

Patent Overview

Title and Abstract

The patent titled "Method and apparatus for providing a web-based interactive map" describes a system for creating and displaying interactive maps on the web. The abstract outlines the method of generating map images, integrating user interactions, and updating the map display in real-time.

Claims Analysis

The patent includes multiple claims that define the scope of the invention. Here are some key claims:

  • Claim 1: Describes the method of generating a map image based on user input.
  • Claim 2: Outlines the apparatus for providing the interactive map, including a server and client components.
  • Claim 3: Details the process of updating the map display in response to user interactions.

Each claim is crucial in defining the patent's scope and determining its novelty and non-obviousness.

Historical Context

Technological Environment in 1998

In 1998, the web was still in its early stages of development, and interactive web applications were just beginning to emerge. This patent was one of the pioneers in the field of web-based interactive mapping, laying the groundwork for future innovations.

Prior Art and Novelty

To assess the patent's validity, a prior art search would be essential. This involves identifying earlier patents and publications that may have similar features. Given the time of its issuance, the patent would have been evaluated against the state of the art in web technologies and mapping systems available in the late 1990s[5].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Geographical Spread

Understanding the geographical spread of similar patents helps in identifying key markets and regions where the technology is most prevalent. For web-based interactive maps, the geographical spread would likely include major tech hubs in the United States, Europe, and Asia.

Saturation of Patent Space

The patent space for web-based interactive maps has become highly saturated over the years. Companies like Google, Microsoft, and other mapping service providers have filed numerous patents in this area. This saturation indicates a competitive and mature market, making it challenging to secure new patents without significant innovation[3].

Competitive Landscape

Key players in the field of web-based interactive maps include Google (with Google Maps), Microsoft (with Bing Maps), and other companies like MapQuest and OpenStreetMap. Analyzing their patent portfolios reveals their strengths and weaknesses, as well as potential areas for innovation.

Patent Family Analysis

Patent family analysis shows that U.S. Patent 5,840,299 may have been filed in multiple countries to secure global protection. This analysis helps in understanding the geographical coverage of the patent and its potential impact on international markets[5].

Technology Classification

The patent would be classified under relevant technology categories such as web technologies, geographic information systems (GIS), and interactive mapping. This classification aids in comparing and analyzing the patent against other similar inventions.

Impact and Relevance

Innovation and Technological Advancement

The patent contributed significantly to the development of web-based interactive mapping technologies. It paved the way for more sophisticated mapping services that are now ubiquitous.

Commercial and Market Impact

The commercial impact of this patent can be seen in the widespread adoption of interactive mapping services. Companies that have built upon this technology have created multibillion-dollar industries, transforming how people navigate and interact with geographic data.

Current State of the Technology

Advancements Since 1998

Since the issuance of U.S. Patent 5,840,299, there have been significant advancements in web technologies, GIS, and mapping services. Modern mapping services include real-time updates, 3D views, and integration with other technologies like GPS and augmented reality.

AI and Machine Learning Integration

Recent developments in AI and machine learning have further enhanced mapping technologies. For instance, AI can be used to improve map accuracy, predict traffic patterns, and provide personalized navigation recommendations. The 2024 USPTO guidance update on AI patents highlights the importance of integrating AI into practical applications to ensure patent eligibility[2].

Strategic Insights

Identifying White Spaces for Innovation

Despite the saturation in the patent space, there are still opportunities for innovation. Analyzing the patent landscape can help identify niche areas or underappreciated technologies where new inventions can be developed.

Assessing Competitive Landscape

Understanding the competitive landscape is crucial for making informed decisions about entering or expanding in the market. This includes analyzing the patent portfolios of key players and identifying their strengths and weaknesses.

R&D and Business Strategy

The insights from patent landscape analysis can guide R&D efforts and business strategies. For example, identifying emerging trends and areas of high innovation activity can help companies allocate resources more effectively.

Visualizations and Reporting

Data Visualization

Using visualizations such as heat maps, network graphs, and trend charts can help present the findings of the patent landscape analysis in a compelling and understandable manner. This aids in communicating complex data to stakeholders.

Reporting and Recommendations

The final report should include detailed data, charts, and statistical trends. It should also provide strategic recommendations for R&D, business strategy, and potential areas for innovation.

Key Takeaways

  • Historical Significance: U.S. Patent 5,840,299 was a pioneering invention in the field of web-based interactive mapping.
  • Competitive Landscape: The patent space for interactive maps is highly saturated, with key players like Google and Microsoft dominating the market.
  • Innovation Opportunities: Despite saturation, there are still opportunities for innovation in niche areas and underappreciated technologies.
  • AI Integration: Recent advancements in AI and machine learning offer new avenues for improving mapping technologies.
  • Strategic Insights: Patent landscape analysis provides critical insights for R&D and business strategy, helping companies make informed decisions.

FAQs

Q: What is the main contribution of U.S. Patent 5,840,299 to the field of web-based interactive mapping?

A: The patent introduced a method and apparatus for providing web-based interactive maps, laying the groundwork for future innovations in this field.

Q: How has the patent landscape for interactive maps evolved since 1998?

A: The patent space has become highly saturated with major players like Google and Microsoft filing numerous patents. Despite this, there are still opportunities for innovation in niche areas.

Q: What role does AI play in modern mapping technologies?

A: AI is used to improve map accuracy, predict traffic patterns, and provide personalized navigation recommendations, among other applications.

Q: What are the key components of a comprehensive patent landscape analysis?

A: A comprehensive analysis includes geographical spread, saturation of patent space, competitive landscape, patent family analysis, technology classification, and identifying opportunities for innovation.

Q: How can businesses use patent landscape analysis to inform their R&D and business strategies?

A: By analyzing the competitive landscape, identifying emerging trends, and understanding the strengths and weaknesses of key players, businesses can make informed decisions about resource allocation and innovation strategies.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. Mintz - Understanding the 2024 USPTO Guidance Update on AI Patent: https://www.mintz.com/insights-center/viewpoints/2231/2024-07-24-understanding-2024-uspto-guidance-update-ai-patent
  3. AcclaimIP - Patent Landscape Analysis: https://www.acclaimip.com/patent-landscaping/patent-landscape-analysis-uncovering-strategic-insights/
  4. Faculty.haas.berkeley.edu - PATENT SYSTEM REFORM: ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND CRITIQUE: https://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/shapiro/patentreform.pdf
  5. Evalueserve - Patent Analysis: https://www.evalueserve.com/patent-analysis/

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Details for Patent 5,840,299

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Genentech, Inc. AVASTIN bevacizumab Injection 125085 February 26, 2004 ⤷  Subscribe 2014-01-25
Biogen Inc. TYSABRI natalizumab Injection 125104 November 23, 2004 ⤷  Subscribe 2014-01-25
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.