You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 24, 2025

Patent: 5,980,491


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,980,491
Title: Automatic needle insertion mechanism
Abstract:An automatic needle insertion device for a pen shaped syringe comprising a cartridge holder (2) wherein a cartridge with a drug can be accommodated, and a dose setting and injection part (1) by which a wanted dose may be set an subsequently pressed out from the cartridge by pressing a button (12) projecting from the dose setting and injection part (1). The device comprises a mainly tubular housing (31) in which a tubular pen holder (22) in which a pen can be mounted can be axially displaced in a proximal direction to cock a spring (30) which can thereafter be released to drive the pen holder (22) with the pen a set distance in a distal direction.
Inventor(s): Hansen; Niels-Aage (Havdrup, DK)
Assignee: Novo Nordisk A/S (Bagsvaerd, DK)
Application Number:08/887,871
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analyzing the Claims and Patent Landscape of United States Patent 5,980,491

Introduction

United States Patent 5,980,491, though specific details of this patent are not provided, can be analyzed through a general framework that applies to patent claims and the broader patent landscape. This analysis will cover key aspects of patent drafting, search strategies, and the current state of patent trends.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of any patent application, as they define the scope and boundaries of the patent rights. Here are some critical considerations:

Importance of Claims and Specifications

Claims and specifications are interdependent and equally crucial. While claims set the boundaries of patent protection, the specification explains how the invention works and provides context for the claims. A carefully drafted specification can resolve disputes over claim terms without resorting to extrinsic evidence, as highlighted in Phillips v. AWH Corp[2].

Drafting Strategies

Astute drafters follow a list of "do's and don'ts." For example, avoiding careless mistakes in claims is vital, as seen in Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc., where a small mistake in claim language led to a ruling of noninfringement[2].

Role of the Summary and Abstract

All parts of the specification, including the summary and abstract, should be carefully drafted. These sections can be used in claim construction, and any statements made here can limit the scope of the claims, as observed in C.R. Bard, Inc. v. U.S. Surgical Corp[2].

Conducting a Preliminary Patent Search

Before drafting or analyzing a patent, conducting a thorough search is essential to ensure the invention is novel and non-obvious.

Tools and Resources

The USPTO provides several tools for patent searching, including the Patent Public Search database, which replaced legacy tools like PubEast and PubWest. This database offers enhanced access to prior art and modern interfaces[4].

Global Search

To ensure global novelty, it is crucial to search international patent databases. Resources like the European Patent Office's esp@cenet, the Japan Patent Office, and WIPO's PATENTSCOPE provide access to international patent documents and machine translations[4].

Analyzing the Patent Landscape

Understanding the current patent landscape can provide insights into trends and competition.

Trends in Patent Grants and Applications

Recent trends show a decline in US patent grants since 2019, partly due to the pandemic. However, patent applications have continued to rise, reaching an all-time high in 2022[3].

Regional and Country-Specific Trends

US-based companies dominate the patent landscape, but there is a significant rise in patents from Asian countries, particularly China and South Korea. China saw an 18.7% increase in patent grants in 2022 compared to the previous year[3].

The Role of International Patent Offices

International cooperation and access to global patent databases are vital for comprehensive patent analysis.

Access to Global Databases

Databases like PATENTSCOPE and the Common Citation Document (CCD) application provide access to international patent applications and citation data, facilitating a more integrated global patent system[1][4].

Machine Translation and Global Dossier

Tools like the Global Dossier and machine translation services offered by various international patent offices help in analyzing patents from different jurisdictions, ensuring that no prior art is overlooked[1][4].

Impact of AI on Patent Drafting and Analysis

The increasing use of AI tools in patent drafting and analysis introduces new considerations.

Disclosure Requirements

If AI tools are used in the drafting process, their use must be disclosed to the USPTO, especially if the AI introduces alternative embodiments not conceived by the inventor. Practitioners must verify the accuracy of all documents prepared with AI assistance[5].

Inventorship and Contributions

AI contributions to the invention must be assessed to determine if they rise to the level of inventorship. This is crucial in ensuring that the named inventors have significantly contributed to the claimed invention[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims and Specifications: Both are crucial, with the specification providing context and the claims defining the scope of patent protection.
  • Preliminary Search: Use comprehensive tools like the Patent Public Search and international databases to ensure novelty and non-obviousness.
  • Patent Landscape: Understand regional and country-specific trends to gauge competition and opportunities.
  • International Cooperation: Utilize global databases and machine translation services to ensure thorough analysis.
  • AI in Patent Drafting: Disclose AI use and verify the accuracy of AI-prepared documents to maintain the integrity of the patent application.

FAQs

  1. What is the importance of the specification in a patent application? The specification is crucial as it explains how the invention works and provides context for the claims. It can resolve disputes over claim terms and is often the single best guide to the meaning of disputed terms[2].

  2. How can I conduct a comprehensive patent search? Use tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and international databases such as PATENTSCOPE and esp@cenet to search for prior art and ensure global novelty[1][4].

  3. What are the current trends in US patent grants and applications? US patent grants have declined since 2019, but applications have reached an all-time high in 2022. There is also a significant rise in patents from Asian countries, particularly China and South Korea[3].

  4. How does AI impact patent drafting and analysis? AI tools must be disclosed if they are material to patentability. Practitioners must verify the accuracy of AI-prepared documents and assess whether AI contributions rise to the level of inventorship[5].

  5. What resources are available for searching international patent offices? Resources include the European Patent Office's esp@cenet, the Japan Patent Office, WIPO's PATENTSCOPE, and other international patent databases that provide machine translations and access to global patent collections[4].

Sources

  1. Clemson University Libraries - Advanced Patent Searching
  2. Finnegan - Practical Considerations and Strategies in Drafting U.S. Patent Applications
  3. IFI CLAIMS - 2022 Trends and Insights
  4. USPTO - Search for Patents
  5. Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney - U.S. Patent Office Issues Additional Guidance on Use of AI Tools

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Details for Patent 5,980,491

ApplicantTradenameBiologic IngredientDosage FormBLAApproval DatePatent No.Expiredate
Novo Nordisk Inc. NOVOLIN R insulin human Injection 019938 June 25, 1991 5,980,491 2016-07-05
Novo Nordisk Inc. NOVOLIN R insulin human Injection 019938 June 01, 2018 5,980,491 2016-07-05
Novo Nordisk Inc. NORDITROPIN somatropin Injection 021148 June 20, 2000 5,980,491 2016-07-05
Novo Nordisk Inc. NORDITROPIN somatropin Injection 021148 October 01, 2004 5,980,491 2016-07-05
Novo Nordisk Inc. NORDITROPIN somatropin Injection 021148 March 10, 2009 5,980,491 2016-07-05
Novo Nordisk Inc. NORDITROPIN somatropin Injection 021148 March 01, 2010 5,980,491 2016-07-05
Novo Nordisk Inc. NORDITROPIN somatropin Injection 021148 January 23, 2015 5,980,491 2016-07-05
>Applicant>Tradename>Biologic Ingredient>Dosage Form>BLA>Approval Date>Patent No.>Expiredate
Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

International Patent Family for US Patent 5,980,491

CountryPatent NumberEstimated Expiration
Australia 3335697 ⤷  Try for Free
Austria E249259 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2258491 ⤷  Try for Free
European Patent Office 0910418 ⤷  Try for Free
Germany 69724784 ⤷  Try for Free
United States of America 6537252 ⤷  Try for Free
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 9801170 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration
Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.