You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 2, 2025

Patent: 8,574,869


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,574,869
Title:Prevention of disulfide bond reduction during recombinant production of polypeptides
Abstract:Provided herein are methods for preventing the reduction of disulfide bonds during the recombinant production of disulfide-containing polypeptides. In particular, the invention concerns the prevention of disulfide bond reduction during harvesting of disulfide-containing polypeptides, including antibodies, from recombinant host cell cultures.
Inventor(s):Kao Yung-Hsiang, Laird Michael W., Schmidt Melody Trexler, Wong Rita L., Hewitt Daniel P.
Assignee:Genentech, Inc.
Application Number:US13354223
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

United States Patent 8,574,869: A Comprehensive and Critical Analysis

Introduction

United States Patent 8,574,869, titled "Prevention of Disulfide Bond Reduction During Recombinant Production of Polypeptides," was granted to Genentech, Inc. on November 5, 2013. This patent is crucial in the field of biotechnology, particularly in the production of disulfide-containing polypeptides. Here, we will delve into the claims of the patent, its significance, and the broader patent landscape it inhabits.

Background and Field of the Invention

The patent addresses a significant challenge in the recombinant production of polypeptides: the reduction of disulfide bonds. Disulfide bonds are essential for the proper folding and stability of many proteins, and their reduction can lead to inactive or misfolded proteins. The invention provides methods and means to prevent this reduction, ensuring the production of functional polypeptides[1].

Claims of the Patent

The patent includes several claims that outline the methods and compositions for preventing disulfide bond reduction. Key claims include:

  • Method Claims: These describe the processes for preventing disulfide bond reduction during the recombinant production of polypeptides. This involves specific conditions and reagents that maintain the integrity of disulfide bonds.
  • Composition Claims: These pertain to the formulations and reagents used in the production process to prevent disulfide bond reduction.
  • Apparatus Claims: These cover the equipment and systems designed to implement the methods described in the patent[1].

Significance in Biotechnology

The prevention of disulfide bond reduction is vital in the production of therapeutic proteins, such as antibodies and enzymes. This patent ensures that biotechnology companies can produce these proteins with the correct structural integrity, which is essential for their efficacy and safety. For instance, Genentech's trastuzumab (Herceptin), a monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of breast cancer, relies on such precise protein folding[2].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Geographical Spread

The geographical spread of patents related to biotechnology and protein production is global, with major players like Genentech, Inc. filing patents in multiple jurisdictions. Understanding this spread helps companies strategize their global patent filing and enforcement efforts[3].

Saturation of the Patent Space

The patent space for biotechnology, particularly for recombinant protein production, is highly saturated. This saturation indicates a competitive and mature field where new inventions must navigate a complex landscape of existing patents. The '869 patent is part of this saturated space, highlighting the need for innovative solutions to differentiate from existing technologies[3].

Competitors and New Entrants

Genentech, Inc. is a major player in this field, but other companies like Amgen Inc. and Tanvex are also active. New entrants often face significant challenges due to the existing patent landscape. For example, Tanvex was involved in litigation with Genentech over the '869 patent, among others, which underscores the competitive nature of this space[4].

Time-Slicing and Trends

Analyzing the patent landscape over time reveals trends and shifts in technology focus. For instance, the '869 patent, filed in 2008 and granted in 2013, reflects the ongoing interest in optimizing protein production processes. Time-slicing analysis can show how companies like Genentech have continued to innovate and expand their patent portfolios in this area[3].

Litigation and Enforcement

The '869 patent has been involved in several litigation cases, particularly in the context of biosimilars. Genentech has asserted this patent against various biosimilar companies, including Tanvex and Amgen, to protect its intellectual property rights. These cases highlight the importance of this patent in the biotechnology industry and the aggressive stance companies take to enforce their patents[2][4].

Strategic Insights

Patentability and Landscape Analysis

Conducting a comprehensive patent landscape analysis is crucial for companies operating in this space. This analysis helps identify potential prior art, assess the saturation of the patent space, and uncover niche areas that may offer opportunities for innovation. For instance, understanding the broader landscape can guide decisions on whether to continue research and development in a particular area or to pivot to newer technologies[3].

Going Beyond Known Competitors

A thorough patent analysis involves searching beyond direct competitors to uncover a broader spectrum of relevant patents. This approach can reveal underappreciated niche areas and provide strategic insights that might otherwise be missed. For example, analyzing the patent portfolios of multiple companies can highlight areas where a company might gain a competitive advantage[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Critical Methodology: The '869 patent provides critical methods for preventing disulfide bond reduction, essential for the production of functional polypeptides.
  • Highly Saturated Space: The patent landscape for biotechnology and protein production is highly saturated, requiring innovative solutions to differentiate new inventions.
  • Litigation and Enforcement: The patent has been involved in significant litigation, underscoring its importance and the competitive nature of the biotechnology industry.
  • Strategic Insights: Comprehensive patent landscape analysis is vital for strategic decision-making, identifying opportunities, and navigating the complex patent landscape.

FAQs

What is the main focus of United States Patent 8,574,869?

The main focus of this patent is on methods and means for preventing the reduction of disulfide bonds during the recombinant production of disulfide-containing polypeptides.

Why is preventing disulfide bond reduction important?

Preventing disulfide bond reduction is crucial for ensuring the proper folding and stability of proteins, which is essential for their efficacy and safety in therapeutic applications.

Who are the key players involved in the litigation related to this patent?

Genentech, Inc. has been involved in litigation with companies such as Tanvex and Amgen Inc. over the '869 patent.

How does this patent fit into the broader patent landscape of biotechnology?

This patent is part of a highly saturated patent space in biotechnology, particularly in the area of recombinant protein production. It reflects the ongoing innovation and competition in this field.

What are the implications of this patent for biosimilar companies?

Biosimilar companies must navigate the intellectual property rights protected by this patent, which can involve complex litigation and negotiations to ensure compliance and avoid infringement claims.

Cited Sources

  1. Kao et al., "Prevention of Disulfide Bond Reduction During Recombinant Production of Polypeptides," U.S. Patent No. 8,574,869 B2, November 5, 2013.
  2. Genentech, Inc. v. Amgen Inc., Civ. No. 18-924-CFC, Casetext.
  3. Patent Landscape Analysis - Uncovering Strategic Insights, AcclaimIP.
  4. Biosimilars 2022 Year in Review, Fish & Richardson.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Details for Patent 8,574,869

ApplicantTradenameBiologic IngredientDosage FormBLAApproval DatePatent No.Expiredate
Genentech, Inc. AVASTIN bevacizumab Injection 125085 February 26, 2004 8,574,869 2032-01-19
Genentech, Inc. LUCENTIS ranibizumab Injection 125156 June 30, 2006 8,574,869 2032-01-19
Genentech, Inc. LUCENTIS ranibizumab Injection 125156 August 10, 2012 8,574,869 2032-01-19
>Applicant>Tradename>Biologic Ingredient>Dosage Form>BLA>Approval Date>Patent No.>Expiredate
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.