Share This Page
Patent: 8,945,869
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 8,945,869
Title: | Factor VIII glycoforms |
Abstract: | The invention concerns glycosylated proteins having human factor VIII activity. In a preferred embodiment, the protein is glycosylated with oligosaccharides that include an alpha-(2,6)-linked sialic acid and a bisecting GlcNAc linked to a core beta-mannose. |
Inventor(s): | Cho; Myung-Sam (Pinole, CA), Chan; Sham-Yuen (El Sobrante, CA) |
Assignee: | Bayer Healthcare LLC (Whippany, NJ) |
Application Number: | 13/482,326 |
Patent Claims: | see list of patent claims |
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary: | Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 8,945,869 To conduct a detailed analysis of the scope and claims of a specific patent, such as United States Patent 8,945,869, it is essential to understand several key aspects of patent law, the patent itself, and the broader patent landscape. Understanding the Patent SystemRole of the USPTOThe U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is the agency responsible for granting U.S. patents and registering trademarks. It provides various tools and resources for searching and analyzing patents, including the Patent Public Search tool and the Global Dossier service[2][4]. Patent Scope and ClaimsDefining Patent ScopePatent scope is a critical aspect of patent law, often debated in terms of "patent quality." It can be measured using metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count. These metrics help in assessing the breadth and clarity of patent claims[3]. Analyzing ClaimsTo analyze the claims of a patent, one must look at the independent and dependent claims. Independent claims define the broadest scope of the invention, while dependent claims narrow down the scope by adding additional limitations. The clarity and specificity of these claims are crucial for determining the patent's validity and enforceability. Case Study: United States Patent 8,945,869Patent Details
Claim ConstructionClaim construction is the process of interpreting the meaning of the claims. This involves understanding the terminology used, the context in which the terms are used, and any specific definitions provided in the patent. Prior Art and NoveltyTo assess the novelty of the invention, it is necessary to conduct a prior art search. This involves looking at existing patents, published patent applications, and other relevant documents to ensure that the invention is new and non-obvious[4]. Determining InventorshipLegal Aspects of InventorshipInventorship is a legal matter that requires the identification of the "true and only" inventors. This involves determining who conceived the idea and reduced it to practice. Errors in inventorship can lead to invalid or unenforceable patents[5]. Patent Landscape AnalysisIndustry ContextUnderstanding the industry context in which the patent operates is crucial. This includes analyzing competitors, market trends, and the technological landscape. Patent Family and CitationsUsing tools like the Global Dossier and Common Citation Document (CCD), one can analyze the patent family and citations to understand the broader patent landscape. This helps in identifying related applications and prior art cited by different patent offices[4]. Litigation and EnforcementReviewing any litigation or enforcement actions related to the patent can provide insights into its validity and the challenges it may face. This includes looking at court decisions and any disputes over inventorship or claim construction[5]. Key Metrics for Patent AnalysisIndependent Claim Length and CountThese metrics can help in assessing the breadth and clarity of the patent claims. Narrower claims are often associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process[3]. Forward Citations and Patent Maintenance PaymentsForward citations indicate the impact of the patent on subsequent inventions, while patent maintenance payments reflect the ongoing value and relevance of the patent. Examples and StatisticsHistorical Context of Strength Training EquipmentFor example, in the context of strength training equipment, a study analyzing patent applications before 1980 found that the majority of inventions were by men, with Lloyd J. Lambert, Jr. being the most prolific inventor. Common features included seats or benches, cable-pulley systems, and weight stacks. These inventions were often designed to be adjustable, inexpensive, simple to use, and compact[1]. Impact of Patent Scope on InnovationA broader patent scope can sometimes lead to increased licensing and litigation costs, potentially diminishing the incentives for innovation. However, narrower claims can facilitate a smoother examination process and higher grant rates[3]. Key Takeaways
FAQsWhat is the role of the USPTO in patent granting?The USPTO is responsible for granting U.S. patents and registering trademarks, providing various tools and resources for searching and analyzing patents. How is patent scope measured?Patent scope can be measured using metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count, which help in assessing the breadth and clarity of patent claims. Why is correct inventorship important?Correct inventorship is crucial because errors can lead to invalid or unenforceable patents, and it is a legal matter that requires identifying the "true and only" inventors. What tools are available for prior art searches?Tools like the Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and Common Citation Document (CCD) are available for conducting prior art searches and analyzing the patent landscape. How does patent scope affect innovation?A broader patent scope can increase licensing and litigation costs, potentially diminishing innovation incentives, while narrower claims can facilitate a smoother examination process and higher grant rates. What are the key metrics for evaluating a patent's impact?Key metrics include independent claim length and count, forward citations, and patent maintenance payments, which help in assessing the patent's breadth, clarity, impact, and ongoing value. Sources
More… ↓ |
Details for Patent 8,945,869
Applicant | Tradename | Biologic Ingredient | Dosage Form | BLA | Approval Date | Patent No. | Expiredate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsges.m.b.h. | OCTAPLAS | pooled plasma (human), solvent/detergent treated | For Injection | 125416 | January 17, 2013 | 8,945,869 | 2018-12-10 |
>Applicant | >Tradename | >Biologic Ingredient | >Dosage Form | >BLA | >Approval Date | >Patent No. | >Expiredate |