You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 26, 2024

Patent: 9,707,153


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,707,153
Title:Delamination resistant pharmaceutical glass containers containing active pharmaceutical ingredients
Abstract: The present invention is based, at least in part, on the identification of a pharmaceutical container formed, at least in part, of a glass composition which exhibits a reduced propensity to delaminate, i.e., a reduced propensity to shed glass particulates. As a result, the presently claimed containers are particularly suited for storage of pharmaceutical compositions and, specifically, a pharmaceutical solution comprising a pharmaceutically active ingredient, for example, PREVNAR 13 (Pneumococcal 13-valent Conjugate Vaccine).
Inventor(s): Weeks; Wendell P. (Corning, NY), Schaut; Robert Anthony (Painted Post, NY), DeMartino; Steven Edward (Painted Post, NY), Peanasky; John Stephen (Big Flats, NY)
Assignee: Corning Incorporated (Corning, NY)
Application Number:14/259,268
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 9,707,153: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 9,707,153, exploring its claims, the patent landscape, and the tools and methodologies used in patent analysis.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of a patent, defining the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. Claims can be independent or dependent, with independent claims standing alone and dependent claims referring back to an independent claim[4].

Independent Claim Length and Count

Research has shown that the length and count of independent claims can be metrics for measuring patent scope. Longer and more numerous independent claims often indicate broader patents, which can have implications for patent quality and the innovation process[3].

Patent 9,707,153 Overview

To analyze the scope and claims of U.S. Patent 9,707,153, one must first identify the patent's title, abstract, and detailed description.

Title and Abstract

The title of the patent provides a brief summary of the invention, while the abstract gives a more detailed overview. These elements help in understanding the core of the invention.

Detailed Description

The detailed description section includes the background of the invention, a summary of the invention, and a detailed description of the preferred embodiments. This section is crucial for understanding the scope of the claims.

Analyzing Claims

Claim Structure

  • Independent Claims: These claims define the invention in its broadest terms and are not dependent on other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to an independent claim and further limit the scope of the invention.

Claim Language

The language used in the claims is critical. Clear and specific language helps in defining the boundaries of the invention, while vague or overly broad language can lead to disputes and litigation[3].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art Search

Conducting a thorough prior art search is essential to understand the patent landscape. Tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and international databases such as the European Patent Office's esp@cenet and WIPO's PATENTSCOPE can be used to find existing patents and published patent applications that may be relevant to the invention[1][4].

Classification Systems

Using classification systems like the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) can help in identifying relevant patents and understanding the broader technological field in which the patent resides[1].

Citation Data

Analyzing citation data, such as that provided by the Common Citation Document (CCD), can reveal how different patent offices have treated similar inventions, providing insights into the patent's validity and scope[4].

Tools and Resources for Patent Analysis

USPTO Resources

  • Patent Public Search: A powerful tool for searching U.S. patents and published applications.
  • Global Dossier: Provides access to file histories of related applications from participating IP offices.
  • Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs): Local resources that offer training and assistance in patent search techniques[4].

International Databases

  • European Patent Office (EPO): esp@cenet network provides access to European patent databases.
  • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): PATENTSCOPE offers full-text search of international patent applications[4].

Legal Considerations

Reissue Patents

When analyzing the scope of a patent, it is important to consider any reissue patents. Reissue claims must be directed to the invention disclosed in the original patent, as per 35 U.S.C. § 251. This ensures that the reissue claims do not broaden the scope beyond what was originally disclosed[5].

Litigation and Enforcement

Understanding the legal landscape around a patent involves considering potential litigation and enforcement issues. The scope and claims of the patent can significantly impact its defensibility and the costs associated with litigation[2].

Case Studies and Expert Insights

Expert Opinions

Industry experts and legal practitioners often provide valuable insights into patent scope and claims. For example, studies by academic experts and legal practitioners have highlighted the importance of clear claim language and the impact of broader claims on patent quality and innovation[2][3].

Court Decisions

Court decisions, such as those from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, can provide guidance on how patent claims are interpreted and the criteria for determining the validity of reissue claims[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Clear Claim Language: Ensuring that patent claims are clear and specific is crucial for defining the scope of the invention.
  • Thorough Prior Art Search: Conducting a comprehensive prior art search using various databases and tools is essential for understanding the patent landscape.
  • Legal Considerations: Reissue patents and potential litigation must be considered when analyzing the scope and claims of a patent.
  • International Databases: Utilizing international databases can provide a global perspective on the patent's validity and scope.

FAQs

What is the importance of independent claim length and count in patent scope analysis?

Independent claim length and count can serve as metrics for measuring patent scope. Longer and more numerous independent claims often indicate broader patents, which can affect patent quality and innovation[3].

How can I conduct a thorough prior art search for a patent?

Use tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and international databases such as the European Patent Office's esp@cenet and WIPO's PATENTSCOPE to find relevant prior art[1][4].

What are the legal requirements for reissue patent claims?

Reissue claims must be directed to the invention disclosed in the original patent, as per 35 U.S.C. § 251. This ensures that the reissue claims do not broaden the scope beyond what was originally disclosed[5].

Why is it important to analyze citation data in patent analysis?

Analyzing citation data helps in understanding how different patent offices have treated similar inventions, providing insights into the patent's validity and scope[4].

Where can I find training and assistance for patent search techniques?

The USPTO's Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs) offer training and assistance in patent search techniques[4].

Sources

  1. Clemson University Libraries, "Research and Course Guides: Patent Searching, Advanced: Overview"
  2. Administrative Conference of the United States, "U.S. Patent Small Claims Court"
  3. SSRN, "Patent Claims and Patent Scope"
  4. United States Patent and Trademark Office, "Search for patents"
  5. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, "In Re FLOAT'N'GRILL LLC"

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Details for Patent 9,707,153

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Llc PREVNAR 13 pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (diphtheria crm197 protein) Injection 125324 February 24, 2010 9,707,153 2033-04-24
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.