You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Cycloserine - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for cycloserine and what is the scope of patent protection?

Cycloserine is the generic ingredient in one branded drug marketed by Sanaluz and is included in one NDA. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

There are seven drug master file entries for cycloserine. One supplier is listed for this compound.

Summary for cycloserine
US Patents:0
Tradenames:1
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Drug Master File Entries: 7
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 1
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 130
Clinical Trials: 131
Patent Applications: 6,981
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in cycloserine?cycloserine excipients list
DailyMed Link:cycloserine at DailyMed
Recent Clinical Trials for cycloserine

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
National Medical Center for Infectious DiseasesPhase 3
Beijing Chest HospitalPhase 3
University of AlbertaPhase 2

See all cycloserine clinical trials

Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) Categories for cycloserine

US Patents and Regulatory Information for cycloserine

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Sanaluz SEROMYCIN cycloserine CAPSULE;ORAL 060593-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 RX No Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Cycloserine Market Analysis and Financial Projection Experimental

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Drug: Cycloserine

Introduction

Cycloserine, a drug developed in 1955, is crucial in treating multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), a rare and life-threatening form of the disease. This article delves into the market dynamics and financial trajectory of cycloserine, highlighting key factors that influence its availability, pricing, and accessibility.

Historical Context and Development

Cycloserine, formerly known by the brand name Seromycin, was initially developed to treat tuberculosis. As an "orphan drug," it is designated for rare diseases, in this case, MDR-TB, which does not respond to the first-line treatments for tuberculosis[1].

Market Dynamics

Demand and Supply

The demand for cycloserine is relatively low due to the rarity of MDR-TB. According to the CDC, MDR-TB cases account for less than 1.5% of all TB cases, affecting only about 95 people nationwide in 2013. This limited demand makes it challenging for manufacturers to sustain production without significant financial incentives[1].

Pricing Strategies

The pricing of cycloserine has been a subject of controversy. In 2015, Rodelis Therapeutics planned to increase the price of cycloserine from $480 to $10,800 for a 30-pill prescription, sparking widespread outrage. This plan was eventually reversed after the rights to the drug were returned to The Chao Center, which then raised the price to about $1,050 per bottle, still significantly lower than the proposed increase[1].

Regulatory Environment

The Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984 aims to encourage competition and lower prices for pharmaceuticals by allowing generic drugmakers to produce and market older drugs without new FDA approvals. However, this has not always led to lower prices for rare disease treatments. Companies often argue that price increases are necessary to maintain supply and fund research for new treatments[1].

Financial Trajectory

Production Costs and Sustainability

The Chao Center, which previously produced cycloserine, incurred significant losses due to regulatory costs, amounting to about $10 million. This financial burden led them to consider selling the rights to the drug. The high cost of maintaining regulatory compliance is a major factor in the financial trajectory of such rare disease treatments[1].

Revenue and Profitability

Pharmaceutical companies argue that the original prices of these drugs were too low to be sustainable. For instance, Turing Pharmaceuticals' CEO Martin Shkreli justified the price increase of Daraprim, another rare disease drug, by stating that the previous price was unprofitable and that the increased price would allow for reasonable profits and fund new research[1].

Funding and Subsidies

The cost of second-line TB regimens, including cycloserine, is prohibitively high for many countries. The average cost of a 24-month second-line drug regimen ranges between $4,788 and $5,786 per patient, which is often greater than the per-capita GDP of many high-burden MDR-TB countries. This necessitates significant funding and subsidies from donors and governments to ensure universal access to treatment[3].

Supply Chain Challenges

Quality Assurance and Regulatory Standards

Ensuring the quality of second-line TB drugs, including cycloserine, is a significant challenge. The lack of capacity to deliver quality care and the variation in country regulatory standards create hurdles in the supply chain. WHO prequalification and other market-shaping interventions are essential to address these challenges[3].

Innovations and Disruptions

Initiatives like the Lilly MDR-TB Partnership have been instrumental in making drugs like cycloserine and capreomycin available at concessionary prices. However, these practices are often unsustainable in the long term, highlighting the need for innovative solutions and positive disruptions in the supply chain to reduce costs and improve accessibility[3].

Public Health Perspective

Epidemiology and Burden

The epidemiology of MDR-TB is complex, with underestimation of the actual burden due to static reported rates over the last decade. Engaging the private sector has shown potential in increasing TB case-finding, but the spectrum of multidrug resistance is increasing, particularly in high-burden areas[3].

Access to Treatment

Only a small percentage of MDR-TB patients receive quality-assured second-line drugs. The goal is to reduce the cost of MDR-TB regimens to less than $1,000 per patient and create systems that facilitate universal access to treatment. This requires addressing the delivery gap and applying lessons from other contexts, such as advance market commitments[3].

Industry and Government Response

Regulatory Actions

Regulatory bodies and governments have responded to price gouging by pharmaceutical companies. For example, the backlash against Turing Pharmaceuticals' price increase for Daraprim led to political interventions, with presidential candidates and lawmakers demanding price reversals and advocating for policies to control drug costs[1].

Non-Profit and Public-Private Partnerships

Non-profit organizations like The Chao Center and public-private partnerships such as the Lilly MDR-TB Partnership play crucial roles in ensuring the availability of drugs like cycloserine. These partnerships often aim to balance the financial sustainability of drug production with the need to provide affordable treatments[1][3].

Key Takeaways

  • Market Dynamics: The market for cycloserine is characterized by low demand and high production costs, making it challenging to maintain sustainable pricing.
  • Pricing Controversies: Significant price increases have been proposed and sometimes reversed due to public and regulatory pressure.
  • Financial Sustainability: The financial trajectory of cycloserine is marked by losses due to regulatory costs and the need for subsidies to ensure accessibility.
  • Supply Chain Challenges: Ensuring quality and addressing regulatory variations are critical in the supply chain for second-line TB drugs.
  • Public Health Impact: The goal is to reduce treatment costs and improve access to quality-assured drugs for MDR-TB patients.

FAQs

What is cycloserine used for?

Cycloserine is used to treat multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), a rare and life-threatening form of tuberculosis.

Why was the price increase for cycloserine controversial?

The proposed price increase from $480 to $10,800 for a 30-pill prescription was seen as excessive and sparked widespread outrage, leading to the reversal of the plan.

How does the Hatch-Waxman Act impact cycloserine production?

The Hatch-Waxman Act allows generic drugmakers to produce and market older drugs without new FDA approvals, but it has not always led to lower prices for rare disease treatments like cycloserine.

What are the main challenges in the supply chain for cycloserine?

The main challenges include ensuring quality assurance, addressing regulatory variations, and managing the high cost of treatment regimens.

How do non-profit organizations contribute to the availability of cycloserine?

Non-profit organizations like The Chao Center play a crucial role in ensuring the availability of cycloserine by maintaining production and providing the drug at low or no cost to patients who cannot afford it.

Sources

  1. CBS News: "Huge price surge for another old drug called off"
  2. Northwestern University Single Audit Report: (Not directly relevant to the topic)
  3. The Zero TB Initiative: "Innovations and Positive Disruptions in the Supply Chain for Second-Line Drugs"
  4. ScienceDirect: "Pharmacokinetic Properties and Tolerability of Cycloserine Following Oral Administration in Healthy Chinese Volunteers"
  5. JAMA Psychiatry: (Not directly relevant to the topic)

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.