You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 24, 2024

Details for Patent: 7,157,584


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,157,584
Title:Benzimidazole derivative and use thereof
Abstract:The present invention relates to a compound represented by the formula (I) ##STR00001## wherein R.sup.1 is a group represented by the formula ##STR00002## wherein R.sup.2, R.sup.3, R.sup.4, R.sup.5, R.sup.6, R.sup.7 and R.sup.8 are each independently a hydrogen atom or a C.sub.1-6 alkyl, or a salt thereof. The compound of the present invention is useful as an agent for the prophylaxis or treatment of circulatory diseases such as hypertension and the like and metabolic diseases such as diabetes and the like.
Inventor(s): Kuroita; Takanobu (Katano, JP), Sakamoto; Hiroki (Amagasaki, JP), Ojima; Mami (Amagasaki, JP)
Assignee: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (Osaka, JP)
Application Number:11/031,057
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,157,584
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 7,157,584: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

The United States Patent 7,157,584, titled "Benzimidazole derivative and use thereof," is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical sector, particularly for the treatment and prophylaxis of circulatory and metabolic diseases. This analysis will delve into the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding this patent.

Background and Invention

The patent, filed by the inventors of a novel benzimidazole derivative, aims to provide a pharmaceutical agent superior for the treatment and prophylaxis of circulatory diseases such as hypertension and metabolic diseases like diabetes. The inventors conducted intensive studies to develop a compound with enhanced potency and duration of action, ensuring stable blood pressure control and safety[4].

Claims and Scope

Independent Claims

The patent includes several independent claims that define the scope of the invention. These claims typically cover the compound itself, its use, and specific formulations.

  • Compound Claims: The patent claims the benzimidazole derivative compound, including its various forms such as crystals, solvates, and non-solvates. For example, the compound may be a crystal or a mixture of crystals, and it can exist as a solvate (e.g., hydrate) or non-solvate (e.g., non-hydrate)[4].

  • Use Claims: The claims also cover the use of the compound as an agent for the prophylaxis or treatment of circulatory and metabolic diseases. This includes its application in controlling blood pressure and managing conditions like hypertension and diabetes[4].

  • Formulation Claims: The patent specifies the structure of the prodrug compound, which is converted to the active compound in the living body. This prodrug is highlighted for its safety and superior pharmaceutical properties, such as strong and long-lasting hypotensive action[4].

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims further narrow down the scope by specifying particular aspects of the independent claims, such as the chemical structure of the compound, the method of crystallization, and the pharmaceutical formulations.

Patent Landscape and Litigation

Litigation History

The patent has been involved in several litigation cases, particularly in the context of generic pharmaceuticals. For instance, the patent was part of a lawsuit where the defendant was accused of infringing the patent through the marketing, sale, and distribution of generic drug products. These cases often arise under the Patent Laws of the United States and involve jurisdiction and venue issues, as well as the determination of infringement and the validity of the patent claims[2][5].

Competitive Environment

The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive, and patents like 7,157,584 play a crucial role in protecting intellectual property. The landscape is marked by frequent litigation, especially when generic manufacturers seek to enter the market. The America Invents Act (AIA) and various court decisions, such as those in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. and KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., have significantly impacted the patent ecosystem, making it more challenging to enforce patents and increasing the risk of invalidation[1].

Regulatory and Legislative Risks

America Invents Act (AIA)

The AIA shifted the U.S. patent system from a "first to invent" to a "first to file" system, which has implications for the validity and enforceability of patents. It also introduced post-grant review processes, such as those before the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB), which can challenge the validity of granted patents[1].

Court Decisions

Decisions like Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International have set precedents that affect the patentability of certain inventions, particularly those involving abstract ideas and generic computer implementations. These decisions can impact the scope and validity of patents in the pharmaceutical sector[1].

Innovation and Technology Risks

Technology Risk

The success of a patented pharmaceutical compound depends on its technological performance. Factors such as the compound's efficacy, safety, and duration of action are critical. The patent highlights the compound's superior properties, such as its strong and long-lasting hypotensive action, which are crucial for its clinical utility[4].

Adoption and Market Risks

The adoption of a new pharmaceutical agent into the marketplace is subject to various risks, including regulatory approval, market acceptance, and competition from existing treatments. The patent's claims must be robust enough to withstand these challenges and ensure the compound's market viability[1].

Patent Scope Metrics

Research has shown that the scope of patent claims can be measured using metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count. These metrics can indicate the breadth and clarity of the patent claims. For instance, narrower claims at publication are associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process[3].

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: The patent covers a novel benzimidazole derivative, its use, and specific formulations, with both independent and dependent claims defining the invention's scope.
  • Litigation and Patent Landscape: The patent is part of a competitive pharmaceutical landscape, with frequent litigation involving generic manufacturers and impacted by legislative and regulatory changes.
  • Regulatory and Legislative Risks: The AIA and significant court decisions affect the patent's validity and enforceability.
  • Innovation and Technology Risks: The compound's technological performance, adoption, and market risks are critical for its success.
  • Patent Scope Metrics: Metrics like independent claim length and count can provide insights into the patent's breadth and clarity.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent protects a novel compound with superior pharmaceutical properties.
  • Litigation is a significant aspect of the patent's life cycle, especially in the pharmaceutical sector.
  • Regulatory and legislative changes can impact the patent's validity and enforceability.
  • Technological and market risks must be managed to ensure the compound's success.
  • Patent scope metrics can help in evaluating the patent's strength and clarity.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is the main subject of United States Patent 7,157,584?

The main subject is a novel benzimidazole derivative used for the prophylaxis or treatment of circulatory and metabolic diseases.

How does the America Invents Act (AIA) impact patents like 7,157,584?

The AIA changed the U.S. patent system from "first to invent" to "first to file," and introduced post-grant review processes that can challenge the validity of granted patents.

What are the key risks associated with enforcing a patent like 7,157,584?

Key risks include validity risk, enforceability risk, scope risk, design-around risk, and innovation risks such as technology, adoption, and market risks.

How are patent scope metrics used in evaluating patents?

Metrics like independent claim length and independent claim count are used to measure the breadth and clarity of patent claims, indicating the patent's strength and the likelihood of grant.

What is the significance of court decisions like Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International for pharmaceutical patents?

These decisions set precedents that affect the patentability of certain inventions, particularly those involving abstract ideas and generic computer implementations, which can impact the validity and scope of pharmaceutical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,157,584

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Azurity EDARBI azilsartan kamedoxomil TABLET;ORAL 200796-001 Feb 25, 2011 RX Yes No 7,157,584 ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Azurity EDARBI azilsartan kamedoxomil TABLET;ORAL 200796-002 Feb 25, 2011 RX Yes Yes 7,157,584 ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Azurity EDARBYCLOR azilsartan kamedoxomil; chlorthalidone TABLET;ORAL 202331-001 Dec 20, 2011 RX Yes No 7,157,584 ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Azurity EDARBYCLOR azilsartan kamedoxomil; chlorthalidone TABLET;ORAL 202331-002 Dec 20, 2011 RX Yes Yes 7,157,584 ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 7,157,584

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Japan2004-048928Feb 25, 2004

International Family Members for US Patent 7,157,584

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1718641 ⤷  Subscribe C300525 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1718641 ⤷  Subscribe PA2012004 Lithuania ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1718641 ⤷  Subscribe CA 2012 00013 Denmark ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1718641 ⤷  Subscribe 91962 Luxembourg ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.