You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 22, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,780,987


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 7,780,987 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 7,780,987 protects GLUMETZA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has twenty-six patent family members in fourteen countries.

Summary for Patent: 7,780,987
Title:Controlled release dosage forms
Abstract:The invention provides stable controlled release monolithic coating compositions for use in coating pharmaceutical oral dosage forms comprising a polyglycol having a melting point greater than 55.degree. C. and an aqueous dispersion of a neutral ester copolymer lacking functional groups.
Inventor(s): Zhou; Fang (Centreville, VA), Maes; Paul (Potomac, MD)
Assignee: Biovail Laboratories International SRL (St. Michael, BB)
Application Number:10/370,109
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,780,987
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Dosage form; Process; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 7,780,987: A Detailed Analysis of Scope and Claims

Introduction

The United States Patent 7,780,987, hereafter referred to as the "'987 Patent," is part of a series of patents held by Depomed, Inc. and Valeant International (Barbados) SLR, related to advanced drug-delivery systems. This patent is crucial in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly for controlled release formulations.

Background and Context

The '987 Patent is one of several patents asserted in a patent infringement action against Sun Pharma Global FZE, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc.[1][2]. These patents collectively pertain to drug-delivery systems designed for the controlled release of incorporated drugs in the upper gastrointestinal system, which includes the stomach and upper small intestines.

Patent Claims and Scope

Claim Construction

The '987 Patent involves specific claim constructions that are critical for understanding its scope. Claim construction is a legal process where the court determines the meaning and scope of the patent claims. In the case of the '987 Patent, the claims are related to a drug-delivery system that allows for extended, controlled release of a drug.

Key Terms and Definitions

  • Polymeric Matrix: This term, also found in other related patents like the '475 and '280 Patents, is defined differently by the plaintiffs and defendants. Plaintiffs define it as "a surrounding medium comprising polymer," while defendants construe it as "a polymeric formulation containing a sufficient amount of suitable polymer or polymer mix to provide extended, controlled release of a drug dispersed throughout the formulation."[1]
  • Coating and Poly Glycerol: The patent specifies that the coating must be "cured at a temperature at least equal to or greater than the melting point of the poly glycol," which must have a melting point greater than 55° C. This coating can be manipulated to achieve a desired drug release profile[1].

Technical Aspects

Drug Delivery System

The '987 Patent describes a drug-delivery system that ensures the controlled release of an incorporated drug. This system is designed to release the drug in the upper gastrointestinal system, which is crucial for drugs like metformin hydrochloride, used in the treatment of diabetes.

Extended Release Mechanism

The mechanism involves a polymeric matrix and a specific coating process. The polymeric matrix ensures that the drug is released over an extended period, while the coating process allows for the manipulation of the release profile. This is achieved by curing the coating at a temperature equal to or greater than the melting point of the poly glycol, ensuring a consistent and controlled release[1].

Patent Landscape

Related Patents

The '987 Patent is part of a suite of patents that include:

  • United States Patent No. 6,340,475 (the "'475 Patent")
  • United States Patent No. 6,635,280 (the "'280 Patent")
  • United States Patent No. 6,488,962 (the "'962 Patent")
  • United States Patent No. 7,736,667 (the "'667 Patent")[1][2].

Litigation and Enforcement

These patents have been involved in several litigation cases, particularly against generic drug manufacturers seeking to market generic versions of Depomed's products, such as Glumetza (metformin hydrochloride). Defendants have submitted Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) to the FDA, certifying that the patents are either invalid or will not be infringed by their generic products[1][2].

Impact on Pharmaceutical Industry

Innovation and Competition

The '987 Patent and related patents play a significant role in the pharmaceutical industry by protecting innovative drug-delivery technologies. This protection allows companies like Depomed to invest in research and development, knowing their intellectual property is safeguarded. However, it also creates barriers for generic manufacturers, potentially delaying the entry of cheaper alternatives into the market[1][3].

Regulatory Compliance

The FDA's approval process for generic drugs, particularly through the ANDA pathway, is heavily influenced by patent litigation. Companies must certify the status of relevant patents, which can lead to legal disputes and delays in the approval process[1][2].

Metrics for Patent Scope

Independent Claim Length and Count

Research on patent scope suggests that metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count can be used to measure the breadth and clarity of patent claims. Narrower claims, as measured by these metrics, are associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process[3].

Challenges and Critiques

Patent Quality and Litigation

There are ongoing debates about patent quality, with some arguing that patents with overly broad or unclear claims can hinder innovation. The '987 Patent and similar patents have been subject to claim construction disputes, highlighting the complexity and potential for litigation in patent law[3].

Economic and Innovation Impacts

The granting of broad patents can lead to increased licensing and litigation costs, potentially diminishing incentives for innovation. However, the '987 Patent and related patents demonstrate the importance of clear and well-defined claims in protecting intellectual property and fostering innovation[3].

Key Takeaways

  • The '987 Patent is part of a series of patents related to controlled drug-delivery systems.
  • The patent involves specific claim constructions, particularly around terms like "polymeric matrix" and the coating process.
  • It plays a crucial role in protecting innovative drug-delivery technologies and influencing the pharmaceutical industry.
  • The patent has been involved in significant litigation, highlighting the importance of clear claim constructions and the impact on generic drug manufacturers.
  • Metrics such as independent claim length and count can help in evaluating the scope and clarity of patent claims.

FAQs

What is the main subject of the '987 Patent?

The '987 Patent pertains to drug-delivery systems designed for the controlled release of incorporated drugs in the upper gastrointestinal system.

How does the coating process in the '987 Patent work?

The coating must be cured at a temperature at least equal to or greater than the melting point of the poly glycol, which must be greater than 55° C. This allows for the manipulation of the drug release profile.

What are the implications of the '987 Patent for generic drug manufacturers?

Generic drug manufacturers must navigate patent litigation and certification processes, which can delay the approval and market entry of their products.

How is the scope of the '987 Patent measured?

The scope can be measured using metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count, which help in evaluating the breadth and clarity of the patent claims.

What are the broader economic and innovation impacts of the '987 Patent?

The patent protects innovative technologies, fostering investment in research and development. However, it can also create barriers for generic competition, potentially affecting drug prices and availability.

Cited Sources:

  1. Depomed, Inc. v. Sun Pharma Global Fze, Sun Pharm. Indus. Ltd., Case No. C 06-00100, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100311 (N.D. Cal. December 20, 2006).
  2. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT ..., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT, Case 1:12-cv-00492-SLR Document 53 Filed 02/27/13.
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope, Alan C. Marco, Joshua D. Sarnoff, Charles A. deGrazia, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, August 18, 2016.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,780,987

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
Santarus Inc GLUMETZA metformin hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 021748-002 Jun 3, 2005 AB3 RX Yes Yes 7,780,987 ⤷  Try for Free Y Y ⤷  Try for Free
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 1 to 1 of 1 entries

International Family Members for US Patent 7,780,987

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Australia 2003211145 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 2003211146 ⤷  Try for Free
Austria 536173 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2476201 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2476496 ⤷  Try for Free
Cyprus 1112517 ⤷  Try for Free
Denmark 1476138 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.