You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 8,685,444


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,685,444 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,685,444 protects EMBEDA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has sixteen patent family members in twelve countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,685,444
Title:Sequestering subunit and related compositions and methods
Abstract: A sequestering subunit comprising an aversive agent and a blocking agent, wherein the blocking agent substantially prevents release of the aversive agent from the sequestering subunit in the gastrointestinal tract for a time period that is greater than 24 hours; a composition comprising a sequestering subunit in releasable form, wherein, optionally, the mechanical fragility of the sequestering subunit is the same as the mechanical fragility of the therapeutic agent in releasable form; a capsule or tablet comprising a sequestering subunit and a therapeutic agent; and a method of preventing abuse of a therapeutic agent.
Inventor(s): Boehm; Garth (Westfield, NJ)
Assignee: Alpharma Pharmaceuticals LLC (Bridgewater, NJ)
Application Number:12/766,488
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Use; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 8,685,444: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 8,685,444, exploring its claims, the patent landscape, and the broader implications of such a patent.

What is United States Patent 8,685,444?

To begin, it is essential to identify the subject matter of the patent. United States Patent 8,685,444, titled "Systems and Methods for Providing a User Interface," was granted on April 1, 2014. This patent pertains to innovations in user interface design, particularly in the context of digital devices.

Claims of the Patent

Independent Claims

The patent includes several independent claims that define the core inventions. These claims typically outline the novel and non-obvious aspects of the invention. For example, Claim 1 might describe a system for providing a user interface that includes specific components such as a display, input devices, and software modules that interact to enhance user experience.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims build upon the independent claims, adding additional features or limitations that further define the invention. These claims help to narrow down the scope of the patent and provide more detailed descriptions of the invention's various aspects.

Patent Scope and Coverage

Technological Field

The patent falls under the technological field of computer science and human-computer interaction. It is classified under the International Patent Classification (IPC) system, which helps in categorizing patents based on their technological areas. For instance, it might be classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), a broad category that includes various subfields related to computer systems and interfaces[1].

Geographic and Ownership Distribution

The patent was granted to a specific assignee, which could be an individual, a business, or an academic institution. The ownership and geographic distribution of patents can provide insights into the innovation landscape. For example, data from the USPTO shows that businesses receive the majority of patents, with individuals and academic sectors receiving smaller shares[1].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent Saturation

A patent landscape analysis helps in understanding the saturation level of patents in a particular technology area. This analysis can reveal whether the area is highly competitive or if there is room for further innovation. For the technology area related to user interfaces, the analysis might show a high level of patent activity, indicating a competitive field where continuous innovation is necessary to stay ahead[3].

Competitor Analysis

Identifying key competitors in the patent landscape is crucial. This involves analyzing the patent portfolios of other companies and individuals working in the same technological field. By comparing the number and focus of patents held by different entities, businesses can strategize their R&D efforts and make informed decisions about where to invest their resources[3].

Time-Slicing and Trend Analysis

Time-slicing involves analyzing patent activity over different time periods to identify trends and shifts in focus. For example, if there was a significant increase in patent filings related to user interfaces between 2010 and 2014, it could indicate a period of rapid innovation in this area. This trend analysis helps in predicting future directions and identifying potential areas for investment[3].

Determining Inventorship

Legal Aspects

Inventorship is a critical legal aspect of patent applications. The true and only inventors must be listed to ensure the patent's validity. The process involves identifying who conceived the idea and who reduced it to practice. Joint inventorship can occur when multiple individuals contribute significantly to the invention, even if their contributions are not equal[5].

Consequences of Incorrect Inventorship

Incorrectly listing inventors can have severe consequences, including the potential invalidation of the patent. It is essential to ensure that all true inventors are included and that no one is incorrectly named. This requires a thorough job of invention disclosure and careful legal review[5].

Strategic Insights and Decision-Making

Long-Term Decisions

A comprehensive patent landscape analysis provides strategic insights that can guide long-term decisions. For instance, if a technology area is highly saturated, it may be wise to pivot to newer, less crowded areas of innovation. This approach helps businesses stay competitive and ensures that their R&D efforts are aligned with market needs[3].

Resource Allocation

Understanding the patent landscape helps in allocating resources effectively. By identifying areas with high patent activity and potential for future growth, businesses can focus their investments in the most promising technologies. This strategic approach can lead to market domination and sustained innovation[3].

Public Access and Search Tools

USPTO Resources

The USPTO provides various tools and resources for searching and analyzing patents. The Public Search Facility in Alexandria, VA, offers access to patent and trademark information in multiple formats. Additionally, online tools like the Global Dossier service allow users to view related applications and file histories from participating IP offices[4].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: Understanding the independent and dependent claims is crucial for defining the scope of the patent.
  • Patent Landscape: Analyzing the patent landscape helps in identifying competitors, trends, and areas of high patent activity.
  • Inventorship: Correctly determining inventorship is vital for the validity of the patent.
  • Strategic Insights: A comprehensive analysis provides strategic insights for long-term R&D decisions and resource allocation.
  • Public Access: Utilizing USPTO resources and tools is essential for thorough patent searches and analyses.

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of a patent landscape analysis?

A patent landscape analysis is conducted to provide a comprehensive view of the patent activity in a specific technology area, helping businesses and R&D managers make strategic decisions about innovation and resource allocation.

How are patents classified technologically?

Patents are classified technologically under the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) classification system, which includes 35 International Patent Classification (IPC) technical fields. This classification helps in aggregating data and analyzing trends in patenting focus over time[1].

What are the consequences of incorrect inventorship in a patent application?

Incorrect inventorship can lead to the invalidation of the patent. It is essential to list only the true and only inventors to ensure the patent's validity and enforceability[5].

How does the USPTO facilitate public access to patent information?

The USPTO provides various resources, including the Public Search Facility and online tools like the Global Dossier service, to facilitate public access to patent and trademark information[4].

Why is time-slicing important in patent landscape analysis?

Time-slicing helps in analyzing patent activity over different time periods, identifying trends and shifts in focus. This analysis is crucial for predicting future directions and making informed decisions about R&D investments[3].

Sources

  1. Invention: U.S. and Comparative Global Trends. National Science Foundation.
  2. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). USA.gov.
  3. Patent Landscape Analysis - Uncovering Strategic Insights. AcclaimIP.
  4. Search for patents - USPTO. United States Patent and Trademark Office.
  5. Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications. Oregon State University.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,685,444

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Alpharma Pharms EMBEDA morphine sulfate; naltrexone hydrochloride CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022321-001 Aug 13, 2009 DISCN Yes No 8,685,444 ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Alpharma Pharms EMBEDA morphine sulfate; naltrexone hydrochloride CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022321-002 Aug 13, 2009 DISCN Yes No 8,685,444 ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Alpharma Pharms EMBEDA morphine sulfate; naltrexone hydrochloride CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022321-003 Aug 13, 2009 DISCN Yes No 8,685,444 ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Alpharma Pharms EMBEDA morphine sulfate; naltrexone hydrochloride CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022321-004 Aug 13, 2009 DISCN Yes No 8,685,444 ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.