You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 9,095,706


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 9,095,706 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 9,095,706 protects IONSYS and is included in one NDA.

This patent has eighty-six patent family members in eighteen countries.

Summary for Patent: 9,095,706
Title:Self-test for analgesic product
Abstract: Electrotransport drug delivery devices, system and methods of using configured to determine if a current is present between the anode and cathode when drug is not intended to be delivered by the device. These devices/systems may include an off-current module to determine that any current (e.g., which may be inferred by measuring potential difference between the anode and cathode of the device) flowing between the anode and cathode is below a threshold value when the device is not supposed to be delivering drug, thereby preventing unintended delivery of drug and/or alerting a user that unintended delivery of drug may occur.
Inventor(s): White; Bradley E. (Mason, OH), Lemke; John (Pleasanton, CA), Hayter; Paul (Mountain View, CA), Chen; Corinna X. (Oakland, CA), Read; Brian W. (Brier, WA), Dougherty; Jason E. (Seattle, WA)
Assignee: Incline Therapeutics, Inc. (Redwood City, CA) Alza Corporation (Vacaville, CA)
Application Number:13/866,371
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Delivery; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of a U.S. Patent: A Detailed Analysis

Introduction

Patents are a crucial component of intellectual property law, providing inventors and innovators with exclusive rights to their creations. To navigate the complex landscape of U.S. patents, it is essential to understand the scope and claims of a patent, as well as the broader patent landscape. This article will delve into the specifics of U.S. Patent 9,095,706, while also providing a comprehensive overview of the patent process and relevant legal considerations.

What is a Patent?

A patent is a government-granted monopoly that gives the inventor the right to exclude others from making, using, selling, and distributing the invention for a specified period, typically 20 years from the application filing date[4].

Criteria for Patentability

For an invention to be patentable, it must meet three key criteria: novelty, usefulness, and nonobviousness. Novelty means the invention must not have been previously described in writing or used by others. Usefulness requires that the invention have a practical application. Nonobviousness means the invention must be significantly different from existing technology[4].

The Patent Application Process

The process of applying for a patent involves several steps, including:

  • Title and Description: Providing a title and detailed description of the invention.
  • Identifying Inventors: Correctly determining who the true and only inventors are, which is crucial for the patent's enforceability[2][4].
  • Drawings: Including drawings that are necessary or helpful in understanding the invention.
  • Claiming Priority: If applicable, claiming priority back to another application, such as a PCT application or a foreign country filing[4].

Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of a patent application, defining the scope of the invention. They must be clear, concise, and supported by the description and drawings. The Patent Claims Research Dataset by the USPTO provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications, including claim-level statistics and document-level statistics[3].

Types of Patent Claims

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to and further limit an independent claim.

Importance of Claim Drafting

Properly drafting patent claims is critical to ensure the patent's enforceability and to avoid challenges. The claims must be broad enough to cover the invention but not so broad that they encompass prior art or are deemed non-patentable[3][4].

U.S. Patent 9,095,706: A Case Study

To illustrate the concepts discussed, let's consider U.S. Patent 9,095,706. While the specific details of this patent are not provided here, we can apply the general principles outlined above.

Reading the Patent

When analyzing a patent like 9,095,706, start with the abstract, which provides a brief summary of the invention. Then, review the detailed description and drawings to understand the invention's components and how it works. Finally, examine the claims to determine the scope of the patent.

Understanding the Claims

The claims section is where the legal boundaries of the invention are defined. Here, you will find both independent and dependent claims. Analyze each claim to see how it relates to the invention described in the specification.

Historical Context of Patents

Understanding the historical context of patents can provide valuable insights. For example, the earliest U.S. patents, issued from 1790 to 1836, were not numbered but are now referred to as "X" patents. These early patents can be found in resources like the "Name and Date Patents" index[1].

Patent Landscape and Trends

The patent landscape is constantly evolving. The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset highlights trends in patent scope and claims over the years. For instance, the dataset shows how patent claims have become more complex and detailed, reflecting advancements in technology and legal practices[3].

Economic Impact

Patents have a significant economic impact. According to the USPTO's economic research, patents can influence innovation, competition, and economic growth. The scope and claims of a patent can determine its economic value and the extent to which it can protect an inventor's rights[3].

Legal Considerations and Challenges

Determining inventorship and ensuring that all inventors are correctly listed is a critical legal consideration. Incorrect or incomplete identification of inventors can lead to challenges and potentially render the patent unenforceable[2].

Small Claims Patent Court

There has been discussion about establishing a small claims patent court to handle disputes involving smaller entities or less complex cases. This initiative aims to make the patent litigation process more accessible and less costly for smaller inventors and businesses[5].

Best Practices for Patent Applicants

  • Thorough Disclosure: Ensure a thorough job of invention disclosure to avoid challenges later.
  • Correct Inventorship: Correctly identify and list all true and only inventors.
  • Clear Claims: Draft clear, concise, and well-supported claims.
  • Compliance with Formal Requirements: Adhere to the formal requirements for drawings and other application components[2][4].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Criteria: Ensure the invention meets the criteria of novelty, usefulness, and nonobviousness.
  • Claim Drafting: Properly draft patent claims to define the scope of the invention.
  • Historical Context: Understand the historical evolution of patents.
  • Legal Considerations: Pay close attention to inventorship and compliance with legal requirements.
  • Economic Impact: Recognize the economic significance of patents.

FAQs

What are the key criteria for patentability?

The key criteria for patentability are novelty, usefulness, and nonobviousness. The invention must be new, have a practical application, and be significantly different from existing technology[4].

How important is correct inventorship in a patent application?

Correct inventorship is crucial as it affects the enforceability of the patent. Incorrect or incomplete identification of inventors can lead to challenges and potentially render the patent unenforceable[2].

What is the role of drawings in a patent application?

Drawings are necessary or helpful in understanding the invention. They must meet the formal requirements of the USPTO and are typically in black and white[4].

What is the significance of the Patent Claims Research Dataset?

The Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications, helping to analyze trends in patent scope and claims[3].

Why is there a discussion about a small claims patent court?

The discussion about a small claims patent court aims to make patent litigation more accessible and less costly for smaller inventors and businesses, handling disputes involving smaller entities or less complex cases[5].

Sources

  1. NYPL Libguides: How to Search for an Historical U.S. Patent.
  2. Oregon State University: Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications.
  3. USPTO: Patent Claims Research Dataset.
  4. SBIR: THE U.S. PATENT APPLICATION PROCESS.
  5. ACUS: U.S. Patent Small Claims Court.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,095,706

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
The Medicines Co IONSYS fentanyl hydrochloride SYSTEM;IONTOPHORESIS, TRANSDERMAL 021338-001 May 22, 2006 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,095,706

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2012238095 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2012238096 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2013266914 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2013274873 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2015271708 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.