You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

CUPRIMINE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Cuprimine, and when can generic versions of Cuprimine launch?

Cuprimine is a drug marketed by Valeant Pharms Intl and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in CUPRIMINE is penicillamine. There are eighteen drug master file entries for this compound. Fourteen suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the penicillamine profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Cuprimine

A generic version of CUPRIMINE was approved as penicillamine by WATSON LABS INC on June 24th, 2019.

  Subscribe

AI Research Assistant
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for CUPRIMINE?
  • What are the global sales for CUPRIMINE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for CUPRIMINE?
Summary for CUPRIMINE
Drug patent expirations by year for CUPRIMINE
Drug Prices for CUPRIMINE

See drug prices for CUPRIMINE

Recent Clinical Trials for CUPRIMINE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

See all CUPRIMINE clinical trials

Pharmacology for CUPRIMINE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for CUPRIMINE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Valeant Pharms Intl CUPRIMINE penicillamine CAPSULE;ORAL 019853-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
Valeant Pharms Intl CUPRIMINE penicillamine CAPSULE;ORAL 019853-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

CUPRIMINE Market Analysis and Financial Projection Experimental

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory of Cuprimine

Introduction

Cuprimine, a drug used to treat Wilson disease, a rare condition where the body cannot process copper, has been at the center of a significant controversy in the pharmaceutical industry. This article delves into the market dynamics and financial trajectory of Cuprimine, highlighting the dramatic price hikes, the impact on patients, and the regulatory scrutiny it has faced.

Background of Cuprimine

Cuprimine, also known as penicillamine, has been used since 1956 to treat Wilson disease. For decades, it was priced relatively affordably, making it accessible to patients who relied on it for their survival[3][4].

Acquisition and Price Hikes

The landscape changed dramatically when Valeant Pharmaceuticals International acquired Cuprimine, along with another Wilson disease treatment, Syprine. Valeant's business model involved buying drugs that were the gold standard for specific diseases and then aggressively raising their prices. Cuprimine's price skyrocketed from approximately $500 for a 30-day supply to around $24,000, a nearly 6,000% increase[3][4].

Financial Impact on Valeant

This pricing strategy was highly profitable for Valeant. The division housing Cuprimine and other controversial drugs generated significant revenue and profit margins. In 2016, this division contributed 23.3% to Valeant's net income, despite the company claiming that these drugs were not core to its business strategy[3][4].

Patient and Public Reaction

The drastic price hikes had devastating effects on patients. Many, like Mrs. Heyman, could no longer afford the copays for the medication they desperately needed. Patients and their doctors had to search for alternative treatments and financial assistance, highlighting the humanitarian crisis caused by these price increases[3][4].

Regulatory Scrutiny

The U.S. Senate Aging Committee, chaired by Sen. Susan Collins, conducted an extensive investigation into the pricing practices of Valeant and other pharmaceutical companies. The committee found that these companies operated more like hedge funds than traditional pharmaceutical companies, focusing on maximizing profits rather than investing in research and development[3][4].

Patient Assistance Programs: A Veil for Profit

Valeant introduced patient assistance programs that covered copays for privately insured patients. However, these programs were not altruistic but rather a strategy to reduce public outcry while maintaining high profits. By covering copays, Valeant ensured that insurance companies continued to pay the bulk of the drug's cost, thereby preserving the company's profit margins[4].

Market Dynamics: Monopoly and Competition

The companies involved in these price hikes, including Valeant, worked to maintain their monopolies by restricting the distribution of their drugs and preventing competitors from entering the market. For example, Turing Pharmaceuticals restricted the distribution of Daraprim to specialty pharmacies, making it difficult for other companies to acquire enough of the drug to develop generic versions[4].

Economic and Health Implications

The price increases imposed by Valeant and similar companies have significant economic and health implications. Patients who cannot afford these life-saving drugs face severe health consequences, including liver failure, liver transplants, or even death. The economic stability of American households is also threatened as families struggle to afford the medications their loved ones need[3][4].

Conclusion

The case of Cuprimine highlights the egregious practices of some pharmaceutical companies that prioritize profits over patient welfare. The dramatic price hikes, lack of investment in research and development, and manipulative patient assistance programs have led to widespread criticism and regulatory scrutiny. As the pharmaceutical industry continues to evolve, it is crucial to address these issues to ensure that life-saving medications remain accessible to those who need them.

Key Takeaways

  • Acquisition and Price Hikes: Valeant acquired Cuprimine and significantly increased its price, making it unaffordable for many patients.
  • Financial Impact: The price hikes were highly profitable for Valeant, contributing substantially to its net income.
  • Patient Impact: Patients faced severe financial and health consequences due to the unaffordable prices.
  • Regulatory Scrutiny: The U.S. Senate Aging Committee investigated and criticized Valeant's pricing practices.
  • Market Dynamics: Companies maintained monopolies by restricting drug distribution and preventing competition.
  • Economic and Health Implications: The price increases threatened both the economic stability of households and the health of patients.

FAQs

Q: What is Cuprimine used for?

Cuprimine, also known as penicillamine, is used to treat Wilson disease, a rare condition where the body cannot process copper.

Q: How much did the price of Cuprimine increase after Valeant's acquisition?

The price of Cuprimine increased by nearly 6,000%, from approximately $500 to around $24,000 for a 30-day supply.

Q: Why did Valeant raise the price of Cuprimine so significantly?

Valeant raised the price to maximize profits, following a business model that involved acquiring critical life-saving drugs and then aggressively increasing their prices.

Q: What were the consequences for patients due to the price hikes?

Patients faced severe financial and health consequences, including the inability to afford necessary medication, leading to potential liver failure, liver transplants, or even death.

Q: Did Valeant invest in research and development for Cuprimine?

No, Valeant did not invest in research and development for Cuprimine. The price hikes were solely to boost profits.

Sources

  1. How Drug-Company 'Benevolence' Silences the Sick - ThinkAdvisor
  2. Financial Results - Bausch Health Companies Inc.
  3. Soaring Prices on Decades-old Drugs - U.S. Senator Susan Collins
  4. How 4 drug companies rapidly raised prices on life-saving drugs - Los Angeles Times
  5. Cocrystal Pharma Reports Third Quarter 2024 Financial Results and Provides Business Update - Cocrystal Pharma

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.