You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

CYLERT Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Cylert, and when can generic versions of Cylert launch?

Cylert is a drug marketed by Abbott and is included in two NDAs.

The generic ingredient in CYLERT is pemoline. There are seven drug master file entries for this compound. Additional details are available on the pemoline profile page.

AI Research Assistant
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for CYLERT?
  • What are the global sales for CYLERT?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for CYLERT?
Summary for CYLERT
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:2
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 45
Patent Applications: 3,784
DailyMed Link:CYLERT at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for CYLERT

US Patents and Regulatory Information for CYLERT

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Abbott CYLERT pemoline TABLET, CHEWABLE;ORAL 017703-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
Abbott CYLERT pemoline TABLET;ORAL 016832-003 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
Abbott CYLERT pemoline TABLET;ORAL 016832-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
Abbott CYLERT pemoline TABLET;ORAL 016832-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

CYLERT Market Analysis and Financial Projection Experimental

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory of CYLERT (Pemoline)

Introduction

CYLERT, also known as pemoline, is a stimulant drug that was introduced in 1975 for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Despite its initial approval and use, the drug has been marred by significant safety concerns, particularly related to liver toxicity. This article will delve into the market dynamics and financial trajectory of CYLERT, highlighting its rise, challenges, and eventual decline.

Initial Market Approval and Use

CYLERT was approved by the FDA in 1975 as a treatment for ADHD. Initially, it was seen as a viable alternative to other stimulant medications like methylphenidate and amphetamines. The drug was marketed by Abbott Laboratories and later by generic manufacturers[5].

Clinical Benefits and Dosage

CYLERT provided observable symptomatic benefits for patients with ADHD, although clinical improvement was gradual and might not be evident until the third or fourth week of treatment. The effective daily dose ranged from 56.25 to 75 mg, with a maximum recommended daily dose of 112.5 mg[1].

Safety Concerns: Hepatic Toxicity

One of the most critical factors affecting the market dynamics of CYLERT was its association with severe hepatic toxicity. Since its introduction, there have been reports of elevated liver enzymes, hepatitis, jaundice, and life-threatening hepatic failure. As of the late 1990s, 13 to 21 cases of acute hepatic failure were reported, many of which resulted in death or liver transplantation[1][3][5].

Regulatory Actions and Warnings

The FDA and other regulatory bodies took serious notice of these adverse events. By 1996, the FDA had concluded that pemoline had an "unfavorable risk to benefit ratio" and considered withdrawing it from the market unless Abbott could provide a satisfactory rationale for its continued use[3].

Monitoring and Withdrawal Recommendations

To mitigate the risks, a liver monitoring program was recommended, involving regular serum ALT (SGPT) level checks. CYLERT was to be discontinued if clinically significant hepatic dysfunction was observed[1][5].

Market Impact of Safety Concerns

The severe safety concerns significantly impacted the market dynamics of CYLERT. Despite its initial acceptance, the drug's use declined substantially as the risks became more apparent.

Decline in Prescriptions

As reports of liver failure and other adverse events mounted, healthcare providers became increasingly cautious about prescribing CYLERT. This led to a decline in prescriptions and a corresponding decrease in sales.

International Actions

In 1997, the United Kingdom removed pemoline from the market due to the significant risk of serious hepatic toxicity and the lack of unique therapeutic benefits over other ADHD drugs[3].

Financial Trajectory

The financial trajectory of CYLERT was heavily influenced by the safety concerns and subsequent regulatory actions.

Initial Revenue

Upon its introduction, CYLERT generated significant revenue for Abbott Laboratories and later for generic manufacturers. However, as safety issues emerged, revenue began to decline.

Decline in Revenue

The decline in prescriptions and the loss of market confidence led to a substantial decrease in revenue. The drug's financial performance suffered as it became clear that the risks associated with CYLERT outweighed its benefits.

Competitive Landscape

The ADHD treatment market is highly competitive, with several safer alternatives available. Drugs like methylphenidate and amphetamines, which have a more established safety profile, gained preference over CYLERT.

Public and Regulatory Pressure

Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group, petitioned the FDA to remove pemoline from the market due to its adverse effects. This public pressure, combined with regulatory warnings, further eroded the drug's market position[3].

Current Status

CYLERT is no longer a preferred treatment for ADHD due to its severe safety risks. While it is still available in some form, its use is highly restricted and closely monitored.

Key Takeaways

  • CYLERT was introduced in 1975 for ADHD treatment but was plagued by severe hepatic toxicity.
  • Regulatory bodies and healthcare providers increasingly avoided the drug due to safety concerns.
  • The drug's market presence and revenue declined significantly as safer alternatives became preferred.
  • International actions, such as the UK's decision to remove it from the market, further impacted its global availability.

FAQs

Q: What was CYLERT primarily used for?

A: CYLERT (pemoline) was primarily used for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Q: What were the main safety concerns associated with CYLERT?

A: The main safety concerns were related to severe hepatic toxicity, including elevated liver enzymes, hepatitis, jaundice, and life-threatening hepatic failure.

Q: How did regulatory bodies respond to the safety concerns of CYLERT?

A: Regulatory bodies like the FDA issued warnings and considered withdrawing the drug from the market unless the manufacturer could provide a satisfactory rationale for its continued use.

Q: What was the impact of safety concerns on the market dynamics of CYLERT?

A: The safety concerns led to a decline in prescriptions, revenue, and market confidence, ultimately making CYLERT a less preferred treatment option.

Q: Is CYLERT still available in the market?

A: Yes, but its use is highly restricted and closely monitored due to the severe safety risks associated with it.

Sources

  1. CYLERT® - accessdata.fda.gov
  2. NMVCCS Analytical User's Manual - CrashStats - NHTSA (Not relevant to the topic)
  3. Petition to Remove the Attention Deficit Drug Pemoline (Cylert) from the Market - Public Citizen
  4. Untitled - Iowa Department of Education (Not relevant to the topic)
  5. Cylert (Pemoline): Side Effects, Uses, Dosage, Interactions, Warnings - RxList

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.