You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

NELARABINE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Nelarabine

A generic version of NELARABINE was approved as nelarabine by ZYDUS PHARMS on November 17th, 2021.

  Subscribe

AI Research Assistant
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for NELARABINE?
  • What are the global sales for NELARABINE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for NELARABINE?
Drug patent expirations by year for NELARABINE
Recent Clinical Trials for NELARABINE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
CellSight Technologies, Inc.Phase 2
University of Iowa Hospitals & ClinicsPhase 2
Beijing Children's HospitalPhase 3

See all NELARABINE clinical trials

Pharmacology for NELARABINE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for NELARABINE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Alembic NELARABINE nelarabine INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 218554-001 Aug 1, 2024 AP RX No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
Nexus NELARABINE nelarabine INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 215057-001 Jun 2, 2023 AP RX No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
Gland Pharma Ltd NELARABINE nelarabine INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 212605-001 Jan 3, 2024 AP RX No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
Shorla NELARABINE nelarabine INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 214809-001 Mar 3, 2023 AP RX No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

EU/EMA Drug Approvals for NELARABINE

Company Drugname Inn Product Number / Indication Status Generic Biosimilar Orphan Marketing Authorisation Marketing Refusal
Sandoz Pharmaceuticals d.d. Atriance nelarabine EMEA/H/C/000752
Nelarabine is indicated for the treatment of patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (T-ALL) and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) whose disease has not responded to or has relapsed following treatment with at least two chemotherapy regimens., , Due to the small patient populations in these disease settings, the information to support these indications is based on limited data.,
Authorised no no no 2007-08-22
>Company >Drugname >Inn >Product Number / Indication >Status >Generic >Biosimilar >Orphan >Marketing Authorisation >Marketing Refusal

NELARABINE Market Analysis and Financial Projection Experimental

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Nelarabine

Introduction

Nelarabine, a purine analog with T-cell specific action, has been a significant player in the treatment of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) since its approval in 2005. Here, we delve into the market dynamics and financial trajectory of this drug.

Approval and Regulatory Status

Nelarabine was first approved globally in October 2005, with the United States being the first country to grant approval. It underwent a priority review process and received accelerated approval, indicating its potential to significantly improve the treatment of serious conditions. Additionally, it was designated as an orphan drug, reflecting its focus on rare diseases[4].

Market Share and Clinical Utility

The market share of nelarabine may be underestimated, particularly in the context of its addition to first-line treatments. The Children’s Oncology Group (COG) AALL0434 study demonstrated that nelarabine, when added to the augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (aBFM) multidrug chemotherapy, showed a clinically meaningful and statistically significant benefit in improving disease-free survival (DFS) for newly diagnosed pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with T-ALL[1].

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Incorporating nelarabine into the aBFM protocol has been shown to be cost-effective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for nelarabine plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone was estimated to be around $26,362 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. This is well within the willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY, making it a viable option for public and private payers[1][3].

Financial Impact

The addition of nelarabine to the aBFM protocol increases costs by approximately $51,670 per patient in Canadian dollars. However, this increase is offset by the gain of 1.97 more QALYs, resulting in an ICER of $26,184 per QALY. The majority of these costs and benefits are accrued within the first 11 years post-diagnosis, primarily while patients are in the relapse-free health state[3].

Patient and Clinical Expert Feedback

Surveys and clinical expert feedback indicate that nelarabine is well-tolerated and has minimal side effects compared to other treatments for ALL. Patients and experts hope for treatments that offer improved prognosis, fewer and less severe long-term adverse effects, and better treatment logistics. Direct experience with nelarabine has been positive, with respondents noting its beneficial impact on their treatment[1].

Efficacy in Relapsed/Refractory Cases

In relapsed or refractory T-ALL/LBL, nelarabine has shown impressive single-drug activity. A phase 2 study in adults demonstrated that 36% of patients achieved complete remission after one or two cycles, with 80% of these patients being transferred to stem cell transplantation (SCT). The overall survival at one year was 24%, and relapse-free survival at three years was 37% post-SCT[2].

Neurologic Toxicities

One of the significant side effects of nelarabine is neurologic toxicity, which can range from grade I to grade IV. However, these toxicities are generally manageable, and the drug is well-tolerated even in heavily pretreated patients[2][5].

Development and Commercialization

Nelarabine was developed and commercialized by GSK Plc, a multinational pharmaceutical company. The drug's success in clinical trials and its regulatory approvals underscore its safety and efficacy in treating T-ALL and LBL[4].

Current Market Position

Given its approval and the positive outcomes from clinical trials, nelarabine holds a significant position in the treatment landscape for T-ALL and LBL. Its cost-effectiveness and clinical benefits make it a preferred option for both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory cases.

Future Perspectives

The use of nelarabine in earlier stages of relapse, in front-line therapy, and in combination with other treatments is being explored. These potential applications could further enhance its market position and financial trajectory[2].

Key Takeaways

  • Cost-Effectiveness: Nelarabine is cost-effective when added to the aBFM protocol, with an ICER of around $26,000 per QALY gained.
  • Clinical Utility: It demonstrates significant benefits in DFS and has a positive impact on patients with T-ALL.
  • Regulatory Status: Approved globally since 2005, with priority review and accelerated approval.
  • Side Effects: Manageable neurologic toxicities are a notable side effect.
  • Market Position: Holds a significant position in the treatment of T-ALL and LBL.

FAQs

Q: What is nelarabine used for? A: Nelarabine is used for the treatment of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL), particularly in relapsed or refractory cases.

Q: How was nelarabine approved? A: Nelarabine underwent a priority review process and received accelerated approval, and it was designated as an orphan drug.

Q: What are the key side effects of nelarabine? A: The major side effect is neurologic toxicity, which can range from grade I to grade IV, but is generally manageable.

Q: Is nelarabine cost-effective? A: Yes, incorporating nelarabine into the aBFM protocol is cost-effective, with an ICER of around $26,000 per QALY gained.

Q: Who developed and commercialized nelarabine? A: Nelarabine was developed and commercialized by GSK Plc.

Cited Sources

  1. Pharmacoeconomic Review - Nelarabine (Atriance) - NCBI Bookshelf
  2. High single-drug activity of nelarabine in relapsed T-lymphoblastic ... - ASH Publications
  3. Cost-utility of nelarabine for the first-line treatment of newly ... - PubMed
  4. Nelarabine: Detailed Review of its Transformative R&D Success - Synapse
  5. Nelarabine: when and how to use in the treatment of T-cell acute ... - ASH Publications

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.