You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

OVCON-50 Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


AI Research Assistant
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for OVCON-50?
  • What are the global sales for OVCON-50?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for OVCON-50?
Summary for OVCON-50
US Patents:0
Applicants:2
NDAs:2
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 7
Patent Applications: 131
DailyMed Link:OVCON-50 at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for OVCON-50

US Patents and Regulatory Information for OVCON-50

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Warner Chilcott OVCON-50 ethinyl estradiol; norethindrone TABLET;ORAL-21 018128-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
Warner Chilcott Llc OVCON-50 ethinyl estradiol; norethindrone TABLET;ORAL-28 017576-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

OVCON-50 Market Analysis and Financial Projection Experimental

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for OVCON-50

Introduction

OVCON-50, a combined oral contraceptive containing norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol, has been a significant player in the pharmaceutical market, particularly in the realm of birth control. This article delves into the market dynamics and financial trajectory of OVCON-50, highlighting key events, strategies, and regulatory impacts.

Product Overview

OVCON-50 is a type of combined oral contraceptive (COC) that includes both estrogen and progesterone. It is used for birth control and is one of the many formulations available in the market[2].

Market Position and Competition

The market for oral contraceptives is highly competitive, with numerous brands and formulations available. OVCON-50 competes with other well-known brands such as Necon, Nelova, and Ortho-Novum. The competition is driven by factors such as efficacy, side effects, and pricing[4].

Product Hopping and Antitrust Issues

One of the significant market dynamics affecting OVCON-50 is the strategy of "product hopping." This involves a pharmaceutical company introducing a new formulation of a drug to prevent generic competition. In the case of OVCON-50, Warner Chilcott planned to launch a new, chewable version and stop selling the original formulation to convert consumers to the new version, thereby preventing generic entry. This strategy was challenged by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which sought a preliminary injunction to prevent Warner Chilcott from discontinuing the original formulation[1].

Regulatory Impact

The FTC's intervention had a profound impact on the market dynamics of OVCON-50. The preliminary injunction allowed Barr Pharmaceuticals to launch a generic version of the original OVCON formulation, and Warner Chilcott was required to continue selling the original product. This led to multiple competing products in the market, including the generic versions from Barr and Watson Pharmaceuticals[1].

Financial Trajectory

The financial trajectory of OVCON-50 has been influenced by several factors, including competition, regulatory actions, and market strategies.

Revenue Impact

The introduction of generic versions significantly impacted the revenue of OVCON-50. With multiple generic competitors entering the market, Warner Chilcott faced reduced sales and revenue from its branded product. However, the company continued to promote the new chewable version, which helped maintain some market share[1].

Settlements and Fines

In addition to the competition from generics, Warner Chilcott faced financial penalties due to antitrust violations. Similar cases, such as the FTC's action against Reckitt Benckiser Group plc for its Suboxone product, highlight the financial risks associated with anticompetitive practices. Reckitt Benckiser agreed to a $60 million settlement for consumers and a permanent injunction to prevent similar future misconduct[1].

Market Strategies

Pharmaceutical companies employ various strategies to maintain market share and revenue.

Innovation and Product Development

Companies like Bristol-Myers Squibb emphasize innovation and the development of new products and indications to drive growth. While OVCON-50 did not follow this exact path, the introduction of a new chewable formulation was an attempt to innovate and retain market share[3].

Pricing and Competition

The pricing strategy for OVCON-50 has been crucial in maintaining its market position. With the entry of generic competitors, Warner Chilcott had to adjust its pricing to remain competitive. This often involves balancing the need to maintain revenue with the need to stay competitive in a crowded market.

Consumer Impact

The market dynamics of OVCON-50 have significant implications for consumers.

Access to Affordable Options

The entry of generic versions of OVCON-50 has provided consumers with more affordable options for birth control. This is particularly important for those who rely on these medications for reproductive health.

Choice and Variety

Consumers now have multiple formulations and brands to choose from, including the original OVCON-50, its generic versions, and the new chewable formulation. This variety enhances consumer choice and satisfaction.

Industry Trends and Future Outlook

The pharmaceutical industry is constantly evolving, with trends such as increased regulatory scrutiny, growing competition from generics, and a focus on innovation.

Regulatory Scrutiny

Regulatory bodies like the FTC are increasingly vigilant about anticompetitive practices, which can significantly impact the financial trajectory of pharmaceutical products.

Generic Competition

The rise of generic medications continues to reshape the market landscape. Companies must adapt to this competition by innovating and offering value-added products.

Innovation and R&D

Investment in research and development remains a cornerstone of pharmaceutical companies' strategies. This focus on innovation helps companies stay ahead in a competitive market.

Key Takeaways

  • Product Hopping: Strategies like product hopping can be used to delay generic competition but are subject to regulatory scrutiny.
  • Regulatory Impact: FTC actions can significantly affect market dynamics and financial trajectories.
  • Generic Competition: The entry of generic versions can reduce revenue for branded products but increases consumer access to affordable options.
  • Innovation: Continuous innovation is crucial for maintaining market share and driving growth.
  • Consumer Choice: Multiple formulations and brands enhance consumer choice and satisfaction.

FAQs

What is OVCON-50?

OVCON-50 is a combined oral contraceptive containing norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol, used for birth control.

What is product hopping in the pharmaceutical industry?

Product hopping involves introducing a new formulation of a drug to prevent generic competition by discontinuing the original formulation.

How did the FTC impact the market for OVCON-50?

The FTC's intervention prevented Warner Chilcott from discontinuing the original OVCON-50 formulation, allowing generic versions to enter the market.

What was the financial impact of generic competition on OVCON-50?

The entry of generic versions reduced the revenue of OVCON-50, but Warner Chilcott continued to promote the new chewable formulation to maintain some market share.

Why is innovation important in the pharmaceutical industry?

Innovation helps pharmaceutical companies stay competitive, drive growth, and provide value-added products to consumers.

Sources

  1. FTC Report on Pharmaceutical Product Hopping (Oct. 2022)
  2. GoodRx - Ovcon 50 (norethindrone / ethinyl estradiol)
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb 2011 Annual Report
  4. Update on contraception: Benefits and risks of the new formulations

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.