You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 26, 2024

THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Theophylline 0.16% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container, and when can generic versions of Theophylline 0.16% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container launch?

Theophylline 0.16% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container is a drug marketed by B Braun and is included in two NDAs.

The generic ingredient in THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER is theophylline. There are thirty-six drug master file entries for this compound. Twenty-six suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the theophylline profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Theophylline 0.16% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container

A generic version of THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER was approved as theophylline by RHODES PHARMS on September 1st, 1982.

  Subscribe

AI Research Assistant
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What are the global sales for THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
Summary for THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Drug patent expirations by year for THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Recent Clinical Trials for THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Tanta UniversityN/A
LG ChemPhase 1
Medical College of WisconsinPhase 1/Phase 2

See all THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
B Braun THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER theophylline INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019083-003 Nov 7, 1984 DISCN No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
B Braun THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER theophylline INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019826-003 Aug 14, 1992 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER Market Analysis and Financial Projection Experimental

Theophylline 0.16% and Dextrose 5% in Plastic Container: Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Introduction

Theophylline, a methylxanthine derivative, has been a staple in the treatment of respiratory diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for decades. When combined with dextrose in a plastic container, it forms a sterile, nonpyrogenic solution intended for intravenous administration. Here, we delve into the market dynamics and financial trajectory of this formulation.

Market Overview

The global market for respiratory drugs, including theophylline formulations, is influenced by several factors such as the prevalence of respiratory diseases, advancements in treatment options, and regulatory environments.

Prevalence of Respiratory Diseases

The increasing prevalence of asthma and COPD, particularly in urban and industrialized areas, drives the demand for effective treatments. According to various studies, these conditions affect millions worldwide, ensuring a steady market for therapeutic agents like theophylline[5].

Competitive Landscape

The respiratory drug market is highly competitive, with various pharmaceutical companies offering different formulations of theophylline and other bronchodilators. The competition is further intensified by the presence of newer, more targeted therapies such as inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists. However, theophylline remains a viable option due to its unique pharmacodynamic profile and cost-effectiveness.

Pharmacoeconomics of Theophylline

Cost-Effectiveness

Theophylline is generally more affordable compared to newer respiratory medications, making it an attractive option for patients and healthcare systems, especially in regions with limited healthcare resources. This cost-effectiveness contributes to its sustained market presence[5].

Dosage and Administration

Theophylline in 5% dextrose solution is administered intravenously, which can be advantageous in acute settings where rapid bronchodilation is required. The precise dosage and monitoring requirements help in maintaining therapeutic serum concentrations between 10 and 15 mcg/mL, which is crucial for maximizing efficacy while minimizing adverse effects[2][3][4].

Regulatory Environment

Approvals and Indications

Theophylline in 5% dextrose injection is approved as an adjunct to inhaled beta-2 selective agonists and systemically administered corticosteroids for the treatment of acute exacerbations of asthma and other chronic lung diseases. Regulatory approvals and clear indications support its continued use in clinical practice[3][4].

Safety and Monitoring

The drug is contraindicated in patients with a history of hypersensitivity to theophylline or other components. It requires careful monitoring, especially in patients with reduced theophylline clearance, such as the elderly and those with certain concurrent illnesses. This necessitates regular serum concentration checks, which can impact its financial trajectory due to the need for ongoing medical supervision[2][3][4].

Financial Trajectory

Revenue Trends

The revenue generated by theophylline formulations, including the 0.16% and dextrose 5% solution, has been relatively stable over the years. This stability is due to its established role in respiratory care and the consistent demand driven by the chronic nature of the diseases it treats.

Pricing Strategies

Pharmaceutical companies often employ tiered pricing strategies to make theophylline accessible in different markets. In developed countries, the price may be higher due to regulatory and market dynamics, while in developing countries, it may be lower to ensure affordability. This approach helps in maintaining a broad market reach and revenue stream.

Impact of Generic Competition

The availability of generic versions of theophylline has significantly impacted the financial trajectory of branded formulations. Generic competition reduces prices and market share for branded products, but the overall demand for theophylline remains robust due to its therapeutic benefits and cost-effectiveness[5].

Special Populations and Market Segmentation

Geriatric Population

The clearance of theophylline is decreased in elderly patients, requiring dose adjustments and frequent monitoring. This demographic segment presents a specific market opportunity due to the need for tailored treatment strategies and ongoing medical care[2][3][4].

Pediatric Population

In pediatric patients, especially those under three months, theophylline metabolism and excretion differ significantly from adults. This necessitates specialized dosing regimens and monitoring, creating a niche market segment with specific needs and financial implications[2][3].

Future Outlook

Advancements in Treatment

Despite the emergence of newer therapies, theophylline's unique mechanism of action, particularly its non-selective inhibition of phosphodiesterase and adenosine receptor antagonism, ensures it remains relevant. Ongoing research into its potential anti-inflammatory effects could further expand its therapeutic applications[5].

Market Expansion

The growing awareness and diagnosis of respiratory diseases in developing countries present opportunities for market expansion. Pharmaceutical companies are likely to focus on these regions to increase their market share and revenue.

Key Takeaways

  • Established Market Presence: Theophylline has a long history of use in respiratory care, ensuring a stable market presence.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: It remains a cost-effective option compared to newer therapies.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Clear indications and regulatory approvals support its continued use.
  • Special Populations: Tailored treatment strategies for geriatric and pediatric populations present specific market opportunities.
  • Future Outlook: Ongoing research and expanding markets in developing countries suggest a positive financial trajectory.

FAQs

Q: What is the primary indication for theophylline in 5% dextrose injection?

A: The primary indication is as an adjunct to inhaled beta-2 selective agonists and systemically administered corticosteroids for the treatment of acute exacerbations of asthma and other chronic lung diseases.

Q: Why is serum concentration monitoring crucial for theophylline therapy?

A: Serum concentration monitoring is crucial to maintain therapeutic levels between 10 and 15 mcg/mL, which maximizes efficacy while minimizing adverse effects.

Q: How does theophylline metabolism differ in neonates compared to adults?

A: In neonates, approximately 50% of the theophylline dose is excreted unchanged in the urine, whereas in adults, only about 10% is excreted unchanged, with the remainder metabolized in the liver[2][3].

Q: What are the contraindications for theophylline in 5% dextrose injection?

A: The drug is contraindicated in patients with a history of hypersensitivity to theophylline or other components, and in patients with known allergy to corn or corn products[3][4].

Q: How does generic competition affect the financial trajectory of branded theophylline formulations?

A: Generic competition reduces prices and market share for branded products, but the overall demand for theophylline remains robust due to its therapeutic benefits and cost-effectiveness.

Sources

  1. Clinical relevance of the substitution of different brands of slow-release theophylline - PubMed
  2. Theophylline in 5% Dextrose Injection USP - DailyMed
  3. Theophylline in 5% Dextrose Injection USP - FDA
  4. Theophylline in 5% Dextrose Injections USP - FDA
  5. A narrative review of theophylline: is there still a place for an old drug? - AME Groups

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.