You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 17, 2025

UROBAK Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Urobak, and when can generic versions of Urobak launch?

Urobak is a drug marketed by Shionogi and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in UROBAK is sulfamethoxazole. There are twenty-seven drug master file entries for this compound. Additional details are available on the sulfamethoxazole profile page.

AI Research Assistant
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for UROBAK?
  • What are the global sales for UROBAK?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for UROBAK?
Summary for UROBAK
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 162
Patent Applications: 4,051
DailyMed Link:UROBAK at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for UROBAK

US Patents and Regulatory Information for UROBAK

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Exclusivity Expiration
Shionogi UROBAK sulfamethoxazole TABLET;ORAL 087307-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Exclusivity Expiration
Showing 1 to 1 of 1 entries

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Therapeutic Drugs: Lessons from UROBAK and Beyond

Introduction

The pharmaceutical industry is a complex and highly competitive landscape, where market dynamics can significantly influence the financial trajectory of therapeutic drugs. This article will delve into the key factors that shape the market success of drugs, using examples such as those from the treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) and other therapeutic areas, to provide insights that can be applied to drugs like UROBAK.

Market Dynamics in Therapeutic Drugs

First-Mover Advantage

In the pharmaceutical industry, being the first to market can be a significant advantage. Drugs like Biogen and Ionis’ Spinraza, which was the first approved treatment for SMA, often become the standard of care and dominate market share initially. Spinraza generated $884 million in its first year and grew to $2.1 billion by 2019, highlighting the financial benefits of early market entry[1].

Competition and Market Crowding

However, the first-mover advantage is not permanent. Late entrants can capture market share by offering better efficacy, convenience, or other advantages. For instance, Novartis’ Zolgensma and Genentech’s Evrysdi entered the SMA market later but quickly gained traction due to their unique benefits. Zolgensma, despite its high cost and safety concerns, became the preferred treatment for newly diagnosed infants, while Evrysdi’s oral dosing made it an instant hit in the US[1].

Different Modalities and Patient Choice

The introduction of new therapeutic modalities can dramatically alter market dynamics. Each modality brings its own pros and cons, and different patient segments may prefer different treatments based on these factors. For example, in SMA treatment, patients can choose between Spinraza’s invasive spinal injections, Zolgensma’s one-and-done gene therapy, and Evrysdi’s oral daily dosing. This diversity in treatment options expands the total market and provides patients with more choices[1].

Financial Trajectory of Therapeutic Drugs

Revenue Growth and Market Expansion

The financial success of a drug is closely tied to its market performance. New entrants can expand the total market size by attracting more patients to treatment. In the case of SMA, the arrival of new drugs expanded the market by nearly 50% in just two years, from $3.0 billion in 2020 to $4.4 billion in 2022[1].

Cost and Pricing Strategies

The cost and pricing of a drug are critical factors in its financial trajectory. High-priced drugs like Zolgensma can still achieve significant revenue despite their cost, if they offer substantial clinical benefits. However, affordability and patient access can be significant challenges. For instance, Zolgensma’s $2.1 million price tag and safety concerns did not deter its adoption, but these factors do impact its market penetration[1].

Operational and Financial Performance

Companies must manage their financial resources carefully to support the commercialization and ongoing development of their drugs. For example, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals saw a 53% increase in net product revenue for their drug LUPKYNIS in 2023 compared to the previous year, driven by strong commercial performance and strategic operational changes[2].

Case Study: SMA Treatments

Spinraza: The First-Mover

Spinraza, an antisense oligonucleotide, was the first approved treatment for SMA. It generated significant revenue, with $884 million in its first year and growing to $2.1 billion by 2019. Despite the entry of new competitors, Spinraza remains a revenue leader, with Biogen generating approximately $10 billion over its lifetime[1].

Zolgensma: The Game-Changer

Zolgensma, an AAV-based gene therapy, was approved in 2019 and quickly became the market leader in newly diagnosed infants. Its one-and-done lifetime cure potential and high price tag did not deter its adoption, with $920 million in revenue in its first full year after launch[1].

Evrysdi: The Convenient Option

Evrysdi, a small molecule taken orally daily, entered the market in 2020 and quickly gained market share due to its convenience. It became the most prescribed SMA treatment in the US within a year, generating over $650 million in worldwide sales in its first full year[1].

Global Outlook for Medicines

Innovative Therapeutics and Spending Growth

The global use of medicines is expected to grow significantly through 2028, driven by the availability and use of innovative therapeutics. Despite losses of exclusivity and the rise of generics and biosimilars, the forecast indicates higher spending on medicines due to the broader availability of high-clinical-value treatments[4].

Regional and Therapy Area Growth

The growth in medicine spending varies by region and therapy area. Developed markets are expected to drive the growth, with older products contributing significantly to revenue. The mix of spending growth is shifting towards more expensive therapies, reflecting increased patient access to high-value medicines[4].

Strategic Considerations for Company Builders and Investors

Identifying New Targets

In crowded therapeutic areas, identifying new and better targets is crucial. This involves understanding the unmet needs of patients and the limitations of existing treatments. For instance, the SMA market saw significant innovation with the introduction of new modalities, each addressing different patient needs[1].

Context-Dependent Strategies

The success of a drug is highly context-dependent. Factors such as the modality of the drug, its efficacy, convenience, and cost must be carefully considered. Company builders and investors need to analyze these factors to position their drugs effectively in the market[1].

Key Takeaways

  • First-Mover Advantage: Being the first to market can provide significant financial benefits, but it is not a guarantee of long-term dominance.
  • Competition and Innovation: Late entrants can capture market share by offering better efficacy, convenience, or other advantages.
  • Different Modalities: The introduction of new therapeutic modalities can expand the total market and provide patients with more choices.
  • Cost and Pricing: The cost and pricing of a drug are critical factors in its financial trajectory, with high-priced drugs needing to offer substantial clinical benefits.
  • Operational Efficiency: Companies must manage their financial resources carefully to support the commercialization and ongoing development of their drugs.

FAQs

What is the significance of being the first drug to market in the pharmaceutical industry?

Being the first drug to market often provides a significant advantage, as it can become the standard of care and dominate market share initially. However, this advantage is not permanent, and late entrants can capture market share by offering better efficacy or convenience.

How do different therapeutic modalities impact market dynamics?

Different therapeutic modalities bring their own pros and cons, allowing different patient segments to choose treatments based on their preferences. This diversity in treatment options can expand the total market size.

What factors determine the financial success of a therapeutic drug?

The financial success of a therapeutic drug is determined by factors such as its market performance, cost and pricing strategy, operational efficiency, and the presence of competition.

How does the global outlook for medicines impact the financial trajectory of therapeutic drugs?

The global outlook for medicines indicates growth driven by the availability and use of innovative therapeutics. This growth is expected to continue through 2028, despite challenges such as losses of exclusivity and the rise of generics and biosimilars.

What strategic considerations should company builders and investors keep in mind in crowded therapeutic areas?

Company builders and investors should identify new and better targets, understand the context-dependent factors such as modality, efficacy, convenience, and cost, and manage their financial resources efficiently to support the commercialization and ongoing development of their drugs.

Sources

  1. Outclassed: The Battle for Therapeutic Market Share - a16z.com
  2. Aurinia Discloses 2023 Year-End Financial and Operational Results - auriniapharma.com
  3. Full year and Q4 2022 results - astrazeneca.com
  4. The Global Use of Medicines 2024: Outlook to 2028 - iqvia.com

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.