You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 7, 2025

Patent: 10,010,568


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,010,568
Title:Method and system for reducing the likelihood of a spirochetes infection in a human being
Abstract: A method and system of reducing the likelihood of an inflammatory disease developing by providing a mucosal adhesive strip to a subject, with the strip provided with at least one of a plurality of agents effective to hinder the growth of spirochetes bacteria in a subject\'s oral cavity. In certain embodiments, an effective amount of Prevotella intermedia is provided to decrease the incidence of periodontitis and to reduce the progression of Alzheimer\'s disease. In still other embodiments, the likelihood that a subject will suffer from Alzheimer\'s disease is reduced by administering via local gingival application to a subject that has been diagnosed with periodontitis an effective amount of an antibiotic effective to kill spirochetes bacteria residing on the subgingival tooth area of the subject.
Inventor(s): Kovarik; Katherine Rose (Englewood, CO), Kovarik; Joseph E. (Englewood, CO)
Application Number:15/342,642
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Understanding the Complexities of the US Patent Landscape: A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction

The US patent system is a complex and dynamic environment that plays a crucial role in fostering innovation and protecting intellectual property. When analyzing a specific patent, such as US Patent 10,010,568, it is essential to consider the broader patent landscape, the challenges and opportunities within the system, and the various factors that influence patent applications and enforcement.

The Probability of Receiving a US Patent

Understanding the probability of receiving a US patent is crucial for inventors and businesses. The USPTO's internal databases provide valuable insights into patent application outcomes. There are three key measures of patent allowance rates:

  • First-Action Allowance Rate: The proportion of progenitor applications allowed without further examination.
  • Progenitor Allowance Rate: The proportion of progenitor applications allowed without any continuation procedure.
  • Family Allowance Rate: The proportion of progenitor applications that produce at least one patent, including outcomes of continuation applications[1].

These rates vary significantly depending on factors such as the technology field, the origin of the application, and whether the applicant is a large or small entity.

The Importance of Objective Application Review

Before submitting a patent application to the USPTO, an objective review is vital to avoid future problems. Tools like LexisNexis PatentOptimizer® automate the review process, helping to identify clerical errors, ambiguous drafting language, and missing antecedents. This automated review can significantly reduce patent prosecution delays and costs, leading to higher quality and more defensible patents[2].

Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs)

PAEs, often referred to as "patent trolls," play a significant role in the patent landscape. The FTC has identified two main types of PAEs:

  • Portfolio PAEs: These entities negotiate licenses covering large portfolios of patents, often without first suing the alleged infringer. They generate significant revenue, with licenses typically valued in the millions of dollars[3].
  • Litigation PAEs: These entities typically sue potential licensees and settle shortly afterward, often involving smaller portfolios and lower royalty amounts. Their behavior is consistent with nuisance litigation[3].

Understanding the activities of PAEs is crucial for companies to navigate potential litigation and licensing issues.

Patent Valuation Methods

The value of a patent can be determined using three primary methods:

  • Cost Approach: This method considers the cost of developing the patent.
  • Income Approach: This method evaluates the future benefits provided by the patent, such as income or savings.
  • Market Approach: This method determines the value based on what a willing buyer would pay for a similar asset[4].

For example, the Google-Motorola deal highlighted the significant value of patents, with Google paying $12.5 billion for Motorola Mobility's portfolio, which included 24,500 patents and applications[4].

Patent Eligibility Requirements

To obtain a US patent, an invention must satisfy statutory requirements, including novelty, non-obviousness, and subject matter eligibility. The Supreme Court's decision in Alice v. CLS Bank introduced a two-part test for patent eligibility, but this has created uncertainty for innovators and investors. Proposed legislation, such as the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2022, aims to clarify these requirements[5].

Strengthening Patent Enforceability

Patent enforceability is a critical issue in the US. The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011 introduced administrative procedures like inter partes review and post-grant review, which have led to numerous challenges to patent validity. Bills like the STRONGER Patents Act aim to address these concerns and strengthen patent enforceability[5].

Analyzing US Patent 10,010,568

When analyzing a specific patent like US Patent 10,010,568, several factors must be considered:

Patent Application Process

  • The patent's application history, including any continuations or divisional applications.
  • The technology field it belongs to and how this affects its allowance rate and valuation.

Patent Assertion and Litigation

  • The potential for PAE involvement and the strategies employed by such entities.
  • The likelihood of litigation and the costs associated with defending the patent.

Valuation and Monetization

  • Using the cost, income, and market approaches to determine the patent's value.
  • Considering the market demand and the potential for licensing or sale.

Regulatory Environment

  • Understanding the current legal landscape, including any recent changes or proposed legislation that could impact the patent's validity or enforceability.

Case Study: Impact of Regulatory Changes

For instance, if US Patent 10,010,568 is in a technology field heavily impacted by the Alice v. CLS Bank decision, the patent's eligibility and enforceability could be significantly affected. Any proposed legislation aimed at clarifying subject matter eligibility would be crucial to the patent's future.

Key Takeaways

  • Probability of Allowance: Understanding the various allowance rates and how they apply to different technology fields and applicant types.
  • Objective Review: The importance of thorough and automated review processes to ensure high-quality patent applications.
  • PAE Activities: Recognizing the roles and impacts of PAEs in the patent landscape.
  • Valuation Methods: Applying cost, income, and market approaches to determine a patent's value.
  • Regulatory Environment: Staying updated on legal changes and proposed legislation that can affect patent eligibility and enforceability.

FAQs

What is the significance of the first-action allowance rate in patent applications?

The first-action allowance rate indicates the proportion of progenitor applications allowed without further examination, providing insight into the initial success rate of patent applications.

How do Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs) impact the patent landscape?

PAEs, particularly Litigation PAEs, can significantly impact the patent landscape through nuisance litigation, while Portfolio PAEs generate substantial revenue through large patent portfolios.

What are the key methods for valuing a patent?

The key methods include the cost approach (development cost), the income approach (future benefits), and the market approach (what a willing buyer would pay).

How does the Alice v. CLS Bank decision affect patent eligibility?

The Alice v. CLS Bank decision introduced a two-part test for patent eligibility, which has created uncertainty and complexity in determining what constitutes patentable subject matter.

What are the proposed legislative actions to strengthen the US intellectual property system?

Proposed actions include clarifying patent eligibility requirements, strengthening patent enforceability, and ensuring transparency and predictability in the IP ecosystem.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Details for Patent 10,010,568

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Smith & Nephew, Inc. SANTYL collagenase Ointment 101995 June 04, 1965 10,010,568 2031-02-04
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.