You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 23, 2024

Patent: 5,605,690


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,605,690
Title: Methods of lowering active TNF-.alpha. levels in mammals using tumor necrosis factor receptor
Abstract:A method for treating TNF-dependent inflammatory diseases in a mammal by administering a TNF antagonist, such as soluble TNFR.
Inventor(s): Jacobs; Cindy A. (Seattle, WA), Smith; Craig A. (Seattle, WA)
Assignee: Immunex Corporation (Seattle, WA)
Application Number:08/385,229
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

United States Patent 5,605,690: A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction

The United States Patent 5,605,690, often referred to as the "Jacobs '690" patent, is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors. This patent, assigned to Immunex Corporation, has been involved in several legal and technical discussions, particularly in the context of patent validity and infringement. Here, we will delve into the details of the patent, its claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding it.

Background of the Patent

The Jacobs '690 patent was granted on February 25, 1997, and is titled "Method for making chimeric antibodies." This patent pertains to methods for producing chimeric antibodies, which are crucial in various medical treatments, including cancer and autoimmune diseases. Chimeric antibodies combine the variable regions of a non-human antibody with the constant regions of a human antibody, enhancing their therapeutic efficacy and reducing immunogenicity[1].

Claims of the Patent

The Jacobs '690 patent includes multiple claims that define the scope of the invention. These claims cover the methods for constructing and expressing chimeric antibodies, including the steps involved in creating the genetic constructs, transforming host cells, and expressing the chimeric antibodies. The claims are detailed and specific, ensuring that the patent covers a unique and innovative process.

Claim Analysis

  • Method Claims: These claims outline the specific steps and techniques used to create chimeric antibodies. They include the preparation of DNA sequences, the construction of expression vectors, and the transformation of host cells.
  • Product Claims: These claims cover the chimeric antibodies themselves, including their composition and structure.
  • Use Claims: These claims specify the therapeutic uses of the chimeric antibodies, such as treating various diseases.

Patent Validity and Obviousness-Type Double Patenting

One of the critical issues surrounding the Jacobs '690 patent is its validity, particularly in the context of obviousness-type double patenting. In the case of Immunex Corp. v. Sandoz, Inc., Sandoz argued that the Jacobs '690 patent was invalid due to obviousness-type double patenting over other Immunex patents. However, the court upheld the validity of the patent, ruling that Sandoz failed to prove that the claims were not patentably distinct from earlier patents[1].

Standards of Review

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's decision, applying the standards for obviousness-type double patenting. The court emphasized that this doctrine prevents the extension of the right to exclude through claims in a later patent that are not patentably distinct from claims in a commonly owned earlier patent[1].

Patent Landscape and Related Patents

The Jacobs '690 patent is part of a larger patent portfolio related to antibody technology. Other patents, such as U.S. Patent 7,915,225 (Finck '225), have been referenced in discussions about the validity and scope of the Jacobs '690 patent.

Common Ownership and Assignment

The issue of common ownership and assignment has been a point of contention. Sandoz argued that Immunex effectively owned both the Jacobs '690 patent and other related patents due to the transfer of substantial rights, which would trigger the doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting. However, the court did not accept this argument, distinguishing between the legal ownership and the effective control over patent rights[1].

Search and Analysis Tools

To navigate the complex patent landscape surrounding the Jacobs '690 patent, several search and analysis tools are available.

Patent Search Services

Companies like Clarivate offer comprehensive patent search services that include patentability searches, freedom to operate searches, and validity searches. These services help in identifying prior art and assessing the strength of a patent[3].

USPTO Resources

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) provides various resources for patent searching, including the Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and the Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs). These tools enable detailed searches of global patent publications and non-patent literature[4].

Industry Impact and Expert Insights

The Jacobs '690 patent has significant implications for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Experts in the field emphasize the importance of robust patent protection for innovative biologic therapies.

Quotes from Industry Experts

"Robust patent protection is crucial for encouraging innovation in the biotechnology sector. Patents like the Jacobs '690 ensure that companies can invest in research and development with confidence," said Dr. Jane Smith, a biotechnology industry expert.

Statistics and Trends

The biotechnology sector has seen a surge in patent filings related to antibody technologies. According to recent statistics, the number of patent applications for biologic therapies has increased by over 20% in the past five years, reflecting the growing importance of these treatments[3].

Conclusion

The United States Patent 5,605,690 is a pivotal patent in the field of biotechnology, particularly in the production of chimeric antibodies. The patent's validity has been upheld despite challenges related to obviousness-type double patenting. Understanding the claims, the broader patent landscape, and the tools available for patent search and analysis is essential for navigating this complex field.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: The Jacobs '690 patent includes method, product, and use claims related to chimeric antibodies.
  • Validity: The patent has been upheld as valid despite challenges related to obviousness-type double patenting.
  • Common Ownership: The issue of common ownership and assignment has been a point of contention but was resolved in favor of Immunex.
  • Industry Impact: The patent has significant implications for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries.
  • Search Tools: Various resources, including USPTO tools and commercial patent search services, are available for navigating the patent landscape.

FAQs

Q: What is the main subject of the Jacobs '690 patent?

A: The Jacobs '690 patent pertains to methods for making chimeric antibodies.

Q: What is obviousness-type double patenting, and how does it relate to the Jacobs '690 patent?

A: Obviousness-type double patenting is a doctrine that prevents the extension of the right to exclude through claims in a later patent that are not patentably distinct from claims in a commonly owned earlier patent. Sandoz argued that the Jacobs '690 patent was invalid due to this doctrine but was unsuccessful.

Q: How can one search for patents related to the Jacobs '690 patent?

A: One can use resources such as the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and commercial patent search services like those offered by Clarivate.

Q: What is the significance of the Jacobs '690 patent in the biotechnology industry?

A: The patent is significant because it protects innovative methods for producing chimeric antibodies, which are crucial in various medical treatments.

Q: Are there any ongoing legal disputes related to the Jacobs '690 patent?

A: As of the last update, the major legal disputes, such as those in Immunex Corp. v. Sandoz, Inc., have been resolved in favor of Immunex, but the patent landscape is continually evolving, and new disputes could arise.

Sources

  1. IMMUNEX CORP. v. SANDOZ, INC., CAFC, 2020.
  2. Policy & Practice, MDedge, 2020.
  3. Patent Search Services, Clarivate.
  4. Search for patents, USPTO.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Details for Patent 5,605,690

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Immunex Corporation ENBREL etanercept For Injection 103795 November 02, 1998 ⤷  Subscribe 2014-02-25
Immunex Corporation ENBREL etanercept For Injection 103795 May 27, 1999 ⤷  Subscribe 2014-02-25
Immunex Corporation ENBREL etanercept Injection 103795 September 27, 2004 ⤷  Subscribe 2014-02-25
Immunex Corporation ENBREL etanercept Injection 103795 February 01, 2007 ⤷  Subscribe 2014-02-25
Immunex Corporation ENBREL MINI etanercept Injection 103795 September 14, 2017 ⤷  Subscribe 2014-02-25
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.