You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 11, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,400,101


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,400,101
Title:Treatment of allergic rhinitis using a combination of mometasone and olopatadine
Abstract: The present invention relates to a method of treating allergic rhinitis in a subject (e.g., a pediatric human subject) in need thereof comprising nasally administering to the subject an effective amount of a fixed-dose pharmaceutical composition comprising mometasone or its salt and olopatadine or its salt.
Inventor(s): Khairatkar-Joshi; Neelima (Thane, IN), Kulkarni; Abhay (Navi Mumbai, IN), Wale; Dinesh Pradeep (Maharashtra, IN), Bhosale; Vikram M. (Mumbai, IN), Agarwal; Piyush (Mumbai, IN), Keohane; Patrick (London, GB), Tantry; Sudeesh K. (Jamison, PA), Oh; Chad (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: GLENMARK SPECIALTY S.A. (La Chaux-de-Fonds, CH)
Application Number:17/003,584
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 11,400,101: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is crucial for inventors, researchers, and business professionals. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 11,400,101, providing a thorough analysis of its claims, scope, and the surrounding patent landscape.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of any patent, defining the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. The claims must be clear, concise, and supported by the patent's description and drawings[4].

Patent 11,400,101: Overview

To analyze the scope and claims of United States Patent 11,400,101, one must first identify the patent's title, abstract, and the main claims.

Title and Abstract

The title of the patent provides a brief description of the invention, while the abstract gives a concise summary of the invention's key aspects.

Main Claims

The main claims of a patent are typically divided into independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims[4].

Analyzing the Claims of Patent 11,400,101

Independent Claims

Independent claims are critical as they define the broadest scope of the invention. For example, if Patent 11,400,101 is related to a technological innovation, the independent claims might describe the core components and their interactions.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims build upon the independent claims, adding specific details or limitations. These claims help to narrow down the invention and provide additional protection against potential infringers.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent is determined by its claims and is influenced by several factors, including the description, drawings, and prior art.

Description and Drawings

The patent's description and drawings must support the claims, providing enough detail for someone skilled in the art to replicate the invention. This support is crucial for the claims to be valid[4].

Prior Art

Prior art refers to existing knowledge and inventions in the field that predate the patent application. The claims must be novel and non-obvious over the prior art to be patentable[4].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the patent landscape involves examining related patents, patent applications, and the overall intellectual property environment in the relevant field.

Related Patents and Applications

Using tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search or the Global Dossier, one can identify related patents and applications. This includes searching by classification, such as the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC), and reviewing the file histories of related applications[1][4].

Global Dossier

The Global Dossier provides access to the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, allowing users to see the patent family for a specific application and access dossier, classification, and citation data[4].

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The CCD application consolidates prior art cited by all participating offices for the family members of a patent application, helping to visualize search results on a single page[4].

Case Studies and Legal Precedents

Legal precedents and case studies can provide valuable insights into how patent claims are interpreted and validated.

Obviousness-Type Double Patenting

For instance, the case of Allergan USA, Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd. highlights the importance of ensuring that claims are patentably distinct to avoid issues of obviousness-type double patenting[2].

Tools and Resources for Patent Analysis

Several tools and resources are available to aid in patent analysis:

USPTO Patent Public Search

This tool provides enhanced access to prior art and allows for full-text searching of patent grants and applications from the United States and over 100 other patent offices worldwide[1][4].

Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs)

PTRCs offer local search resources and training in patent search techniques, which can be invaluable for conducting a thorough patent analysis[4].

Patent Claims Research Dataset

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications, including claim-level statistics and document-level statistics. This dataset can help in analyzing the scope and trends of patent claims[3].

Best Practices for Conducting a Preliminary Patent Search

Conducting a preliminary patent search is essential before filing a patent application.

Step-by-Step Strategy

The USPTO provides a step-by-step strategy for conducting a preliminary U.S. patent search, including using the Patent Public Search tool and searching by classification[4].

Training and Resources

Utilizing resources like the USPTO's computer-based training tutorial and the assistance of trained staff at the Public Search Facility can significantly enhance the search process[1][4].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: The claims of a patent define its scope and must be clear, concise, and supported by the description and drawings.
  • Patent Landscape: Understanding related patents and applications is crucial for navigating the intellectual property environment.
  • Tools and Resources: Utilize tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and PTRCs to conduct thorough patent analyses.
  • Legal Precedents: Be aware of legal precedents such as obviousness-type double patenting to ensure claims are valid.

FAQs

Q: What are the key components of a patent claim? A: The key components include independent and dependent claims, with independent claims defining the broadest scope of the invention and dependent claims adding specific details or limitations.

Q: How do I conduct a preliminary patent search? A: Use the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool, follow a step-by-step strategy, and utilize resources like the Global Dossier and PTRCs.

Q: What is the importance of prior art in patent analysis? A: Prior art ensures that the claims are novel and non-obvious, which is essential for the patent to be valid.

Q: What is the Common Citation Document (CCD)? A: The CCD consolidates prior art cited by all participating offices for the family members of a patent application, providing a single point of access to citation data.

Q: How can I access detailed information on patent claims? A: Use the USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset, which provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications.

Sources

  1. Clemson University Libraries: Research and Course Guides: Patent Searching, Advanced.
  2. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: Allergan USA, Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd.
  3. United States Patent and Trademark Office: Patent Claims Research Dataset.
  4. United States Patent and Trademark Office: Search for patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,400,101

Showing 1 to 1 of 1 entries

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 11,400,101

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
India3174/MUM/2013Oct 4, 2013

International Family Members for US Patent 11,400,101

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
European Patent Office 3043773 ⤷  Try for Free CA 2021 00050 Denmark ⤷  Try for Free
European Patent Office 3043773 ⤷  Try for Free 301154 Netherlands ⤷  Try for Free
European Patent Office 3043773 ⤷  Try for Free 122021000085 Germany ⤷  Try for Free
European Patent Office 3043773 ⤷  Try for Free 132021000000191 Italy ⤷  Try for Free
European Patent Office 3043773 ⤷  Try for Free 57/2021 Austria ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 5 of 5 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.