You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 8,754,065


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,754,065
Title:Tenofovir alafenamide hemifumarate
Abstract: A hemifumarate form of 9-[(R)-2-[[(S)-[[(S)-1-(isopropoxycarbonyl)ethyl]amino]phenoxyphosphinyl]- methoxy]propyl]adenine (tenofovir alafenamide), and antiviral therapy using tenofovir alafenamide hemifumarate (e.g., anti-HIV and anti-HBV therapies).
Inventor(s): Liu; Dazhan (Alberta, CA), Shi; Bing (Foster City, CA), Wang; Fang (Foster City, CA), Yu; Richard Hung Chiu (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: Gilead Sciences, Inc. (CA)
Application Number:13/586,358
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,754,065
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Use; Process; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 8,754,065

Introduction

United States Patent 8,754,065, hereafter referred to as the '065 Patent, is a crucial component in the patent landscape of pharmaceuticals, particularly in the context of HIV and hepatitis B treatments. This patent, along with others such as U.S. Patent Nos. 7,390,791 and 9,296,769, has been at the center of significant legal and pharmaceutical industry discussions.

Background of the Patent

The '065 Patent is associated with Gilead Sciences Inc. and pertains to specific formulations of tenofovir alafenamide, a prodrug used in the treatment of HIV and hepatitis B. The patent was granted on June 17, 2014, and is part of a broader portfolio of patents that Gilead holds for its antiviral medications, including Descovy, Vemlidy, and Odefsey[2].

Claim Construction and Interpretation

The claims within the '065 Patent have been subject to detailed interpretation and construction, particularly in the context of patent litigation. The court's rulings on disputed claim terms provide insight into how these claims are defined and interpreted.

  • "Tenofovir alafenamide hemifumarate": This term is defined as "a hemifumarate form of tenofovir alafenamide"[1].
  • "Diastereomerically enriched": This term means "enriched relative to all other diastereomers"[1].
  • Ordinary and Customary Meaning: The court follows the principle that the words of a claim are generally given their ordinary and customary meaning, which is the meaning that the term would have to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention[1].

Patent Scope and Claims

The scope of the '065 Patent is defined by its claims, which outline the specific inventions and innovations covered. Here are some key aspects:

  • Independent Claims: The patent includes multiple independent claims that define the core inventions. These claims are critical in determining the scope of protection afforded by the patent[3].
  • Dependent Claims: Dependent claims further narrow down the scope by adding additional limitations to the independent claims. These claims help in clarifying the specific embodiments covered by the patent[3].

Patent Litigation and Settlements

The '065 Patent has been involved in significant litigation, particularly against generic drug manufacturers. Here are some key points:

  • Gilead vs. Generic Drug Makers: Gilead Sciences Inc. sued several generic drug manufacturers, including Apotex Inc., Lupin Ltd., Cipla Ltd., MacLeods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., and Hetero Labs Ltd., for patent infringement. The case was settled on the eve of a bench trial, with Gilead agreeing to grant non-exclusive licenses to the generic manufacturers starting from specific dates in 2031 and 2032[2].
  • Validity and Infringement: The generic drug manufacturers had agreed that their drugs would infringe Gilead’s patents but planned to challenge the patents’ validity during the trial. The settlement avoided the need for a trial, thereby resolving the dispute without a court ruling on the patents’ validity[2].

Patent Exclusivities and FDA Regulations

The '065 Patent is also intertwined with FDA regulations and exclusivities:

  • Orange Book Listings: The patent is listed in the FDA's Orange Book, which compiles patent and exclusivity information for approved drug products. This listing is crucial for understanding the patent landscape and exclusivity periods associated with the drug[4].
  • Exclusivity Periods: The patent's expiration date and any associated exclusivity periods are critical in determining when generic versions of the drug can be marketed. The USPTO and FDA collaborate to ensure that these periods are accurately mapped and communicated[4].

Impact on Pharmaceutical Industry

The '065 Patent and related patents have significant implications for the pharmaceutical industry:

  • Innovation and Competition: The patent landscape influences innovation and competition in the pharmaceutical sector. Broad or overly broad patents can impact the incentives for innovation and increase licensing and litigation costs[3].
  • Generic Competition: The settlement allowing generic manufacturers to enter the market after specific dates highlights the balance between protecting intellectual property and promoting generic competition to lower drug prices[2].

Key Takeaways

  • Claim Construction: The court's interpretation of claim terms is crucial in defining the scope of the patent.
  • Litigation and Settlements: The '065 Patent has been central to significant litigation, with settlements impacting the timing of generic drug entry.
  • Regulatory Environment: The patent is closely tied to FDA regulations and exclusivity periods.
  • Industry Impact: The patent landscape affects innovation, competition, and the availability of generic drugs.

FAQs

Q: What is the '065 Patent related to? A: The '065 Patent is related to specific formulations of tenofovir alafenamide, used in the treatment of HIV and hepatitis B.

Q: What was the outcome of the litigation between Gilead and generic drug manufacturers? A: The litigation was settled with Gilead agreeing to grant non-exclusive licenses to the generic manufacturers starting from specific dates in 2031 and 2032.

Q: How are claim terms in the '065 Patent interpreted? A: Claim terms are interpreted based on their ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention.

Q: What is the significance of the Orange Book listing for the '065 Patent? A: The Orange Book listing provides critical information on patent and exclusivity periods associated with the drug, influencing when generic versions can be marketed.

Q: How does the patent landscape impact the pharmaceutical industry? A: The patent landscape affects innovation, competition, and the availability of generic drugs, influencing the balance between protecting intellectual property and promoting generic competition.

Sources

  1. District of Delaware Court Rulings: "20-189.pdf - District of Delaware" - U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.
  2. Gilead Settles HIV Drugs Patent Suit: "Gilead Settles HIV Drugs Patent Suit on Eve of Bench Trial" - Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope: "Patent Claims and Patent Scope" - SSRN.
  4. USPTO-FDA Report on Drug Patent and Exclusivity: "USPTO-FDA Report on Drug Patent and Exclusivity" - USPTO.
  5. FDA Approval Letter for Tenofovir Alafenamide Tablets: "Tenofovir Alafenamide Tablets - accessdata.fda.gov" - FDA.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,754,065

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Janssen Prods SYMTUZA cobicistat; darunavir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate TABLET;ORAL 210455-001 Jul 17, 2018 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y Y TREATMENT OF HIV-1 INFECTION IN ADULTS WHO HAVE NO PRIOR ANTIRETROVIRAL TREATMENT HISTORY OR ARE VIROLOGICALLY SUPPRESSED ON A STABLE ANTIRETROVIRAL REGIMEN FOR AT LEAST 6 MONTHS ⤷  Subscribe
Janssen Prods SYMTUZA cobicistat; darunavir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate TABLET;ORAL 210455-001 Jul 17, 2018 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y Y TREATMENT OF HIV-1 INFECTION IN ADULTS AND PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WEIGHING AT LEAST 40 KG WHO HAVE NO PRIOR ANTIRETROVIRAL TREATMENT HISTORY OR ARE VIROLOGICALLY SUPPRESSED ON A STABLE ANTIRETROVIRAL REGIMEN FOR AT LEAST 6 MONTHS ⤷  Subscribe
Gilead Sciences Inc BIKTARVY bictegravir sodium; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate TABLET;ORAL 210251-002 Oct 7, 2021 RX Yes No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Gilead Sciences Inc BIKTARVY bictegravir sodium; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate TABLET;ORAL 210251-001 Feb 7, 2018 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Gilead Sciences Inc DESCOVY emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate TABLET;ORAL 208215-002 Jan 7, 2022 RX Yes No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,754,065

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 3639 ⤷  Subscribe
Argentina 087546 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2012296622 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2014271320 ⤷  Subscribe
Brazil 112014003420 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.